Reply With Quote
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
I'm almost afraid to watch this thing. Can imagine what the substance and scope of foreign policy will entail.
Oh well. Here goes...holding my nose during the dive in.
What Rand Paul has to overcome
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5Q-yNNu-tM
I got another video but this one you should probably skip (only for the diehards that can really stomach it)Originally Posted by Natural Citizen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SajSxHvLp-o
Who cares? It's MSNBC. Very few Republicans watch that crap.
================
Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.
Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America
The Property Basis of Rights
i tried. couldn't get thru it. so much bs
lol they invite peter king after this segment? be more transparent please
I wonder if they realize they are actually promoting him.
The "isolationist strain"...lol F these guys.
THE SQUAD of RPF
1. enhanced_deficit - Paid Troll / John Bolton book promoter
2. Devil21 - LARPing Wizard, fake magical script reader
3. Firestarter - Tax Troll; anti-tax = "criminal behavior"
4. TheCount - Comet Pizza Pedo Denier <-- sick
@Ehanced_Deficit's real agenda on RPF =troll:
Who spends this much time copy/pasting the same recycled links, photos/talking points.
7 yrs/25k posts later RPF'ers still respond to this troll
The similarity to a Morning Joe panel discussion is remarkable.
“Do you not know, my son, with how little wisdom the world is governed?” - Oxenstiern
Violence will not save us. Let us love one another, for love is from God.
Yep, they NEVER change. It's a propaganda term, so they have to repeat it to quietly communicate the old "Paul will not engage threats to the US or it's allies" meme. This keeps the conversation from questioning the "threats" or how they came to be (US covert actions, sanctions, drones, excessive treaty or "special relationship" entanglements, etc). It's not about defending bad neocon arguments, or the failed track record of intervention, it's about keeping the mental framework of intervening in place.
-----Peace & Freedom, John Clifton-----
Blog: https://electclifton.wordpress.com/2...back-backlash/
Yeah it's funny when they're criticizing him because he can't get the "money/donor Republicans" nor the "mainstream Republicans".
Founder and leader of the militant wing of the Salvation Army.
Scarborough is a joke. He was going on and on during the Bush years about how terrible Bush's foreign policy was and how terrible the war in Iraq was, and now he's all for war with Iran and was criticizing Rand simply for not pledging to go to war with Iran. This guy has absolutely no credibility left at all.
When Joe Scarborough pondered aloud "I don't know what he's in the middle of..." did it ever occur to him to suggest that Rand was "in the middle" of the decades old Republican tradition of nonintervention? Scarborough is such an establishment tool.
Last edited by anaconda; 04-17-2014 at 09:12 PM.
Scarborough supposedly voted for Ron Paul in the last election but somehow Rand's watered down non-interventionist message is too controversial?
I think he just said that his son was a Ron Paul supporter. I highly doubt if Scarborough ever voted for him.
OP Ed from June 12, 2012:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0612/77335.html
Posting Permissions
Connect With Us