Germany bans managers from calling or emailing staff after work hours

[DamianTV]

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/germany-b...461070-79.html

Germany's labor ministry has banned managers from calling or emailing staff out of hours except in emergencies. The ministry says the measure is intended to prevent staff from suffering undue stress by being constantly on call.

Daily Sueddeutsche Zeitung reported Friday that the ministry is following the lead of major German companies such as automaker Volkswagen and Deutsche Telekom.

The newspaper cited official guidelines stating that no staff should be penalized for turning off their cellphone or failing to pick up messages after working hours "to prevent self-exploitation."

It said managers were also being urged to refrain from calling staff while on leave but out-of-hours contact was permitted "in exceptional circumstances."

General Politics because... there needs to be a Law against EVERYTHING?

[angelatc]

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/germany-b...461070-79.html



General Politics because... there needs to be a Law against EVERYTHING?

Should be in International Affairs.

[eduardo89]

I thought you'd support that law, Damian.

[Christian Liberty]

I thought you'd support that law, Damian.

I don't, but I do think that an employer who expects his employees to be on call all the time is taking advantage. Off time should be off time where possible.

[eduardo89]

I don't, but I do think that an employer who expects his employees to be on call all the time is taking advantage. Off time should be off time where possible.

There are many industries where you are on call all the time.

[Danke]

I never answer company calls. But if they leave me a msg saying Purty Please call me back, I might.

[KingNothing]

I work about 60 hours a week, and have my work-email open any time I'm on the laptop at home. I've no compunction about responding while "not working." What's the big deal?

[eduardo89]

I never answer company calls. But if they leave me a msg saying Purty Please call me back, I might.

My services are in 'high' demand, so I try to keep my customers happy.

[Brian4Liberty]

Ever since the internet, many people are working pretty much every waking hour. Many employers expect it.

Can you stand up to that pressure? Depends on the labor market, doesn't it? Supply and demand, it's not just for widgets.

[Intoxiklown]

If a you are given a company cell phone, you are expected to answer it when work calls. These people aren't asked to come in and work if they're on their off hours, but usually just are being asked to answer a question. At least, in all the management jobs I've had, it was always an off shift supervisor calling me looking for an answer to a problem they were having. People want to have good paying leadership jobs, and only work 40 hour weeks.

That is the ultimate in a lazy person who feels they are entitled to everything.

And same with the email. Why is it considered taking advantage of emailing someone?

[ZENemy]

There are many industries where you are on call all the time.

Correct.

I am, I.T.

[Danke]

My services are in 'high' demand, so I try to keep my customers happy.

So are mine, i can cost the company thousands of dollars by just showing up late.

[eduardo89]

Correct.

I am, I.T.

That is the exact industry I had in mind. I'm consulting at a bank right now and the IT guys, especially the guys who are in charge of the core banking software, are on call 24/7/365.

[eduardo89]

So are mine, i can cost the company thousands of dollars by just showing up late.

I even put quotation marks over one word, but it seems you missed what I was trying to say.

[KingNothing]

If a you are given a company cell phone, you are expected to answer it when work calls. These people aren't asked to come in and work if they're on their off hours, but usually just are being asked to answer a question. At least, in all the management jobs I've had, it was always an off shift supervisor calling me looking for an answer to a problem they were having. People want to have good paying leadership jobs, and only work 40 hour weeks.

That is the ultimate in a lazy person who feels they are entitled to everything.

And same with the email. Why is it considered taking advantage of emailing someone?

There are very, very, very few salaries workers who only put in 40 hours a week that I'd consider "good" employees. If you aren't putting in at least 50 hours a week, you aren't working hard enough.

[Danke]

I even put quotation marks over one word, but it seems you missed what I was trying to say.

I did, but I respect your profession. Keep safe.

[specsaregood]

I work about 60 hours a week, and have my work-email open any time I'm on the laptop at home. I've no compunction about responding while "not working." What's the big deal?

I respond to customers I like at all hours of the day/night 7days aweek. The douchebags have to wait until work hours and weekdays.

[Danke]

There are very, very, very few salaries workers who only put in 40 hours a week that I'd consider "good" employees. If you aren't putting in at least 50 hours a week, you aren't working hard enough.

Sounds like something I did in the Military.

[KingNothing]

My services are in 'high' demand, so I try to keep my customers happy.

[eduardo89]

I respond to customers I like at all hours of the day/night 7days aweek. The douchebags have to wait until work hours and weekdays.

You never respond to my emails outside of working hours....

[specsaregood]

You never respond to my emails outside of working hours....

Well I only give the 24hour treatment to customers that pay their invoices on time and without complaint.

[Danke]

You never respond to my emails outside of working hours....

I don't think Specs speaks Spanish.

[eduardo89]

I don't think Specs speaks Spanish.

I translate all my emails on Google Translate first. That way there's no chance of misunderstanding what I want to say.

[Intoxiklown]

There are very, very, very few salaries workers who only put in 40 hours a week that I'd consider "good" employees. If you aren't putting in at least 50 hours a week, you aren't working hard enough.

Every salaried position I've held was based on a 50 hour work week. But I've known people who do all they can to work 8 hours a day, and make sure they take their whole hour for lunch.

[Paulbot99]

There's a big difference between a company's policy and a government law.

[satchelmcqueen]

good! when im done at work, my home life begins. i dont respond to work calls, text or email after i get home. they respect that and im glad.

[The Free Hornet]

I'm surprised that email is within scope of the "law" (if it even is a law). Set the smart phone to not buzz on new emails and half the problem is solved.

Also, our work has no "after work hours" (3-shift operation) and salaried folk have no set hours. "After" hours is meaningless. Some people are at their desk 6am. Others wake up hours later.

Although protocols and habits have to evolve to deal with the tech, people are more productive - generally - than ever before. I and coworkers spend a lot less time driving because we can communicate in a few minutes what could take 2-3 hours if you had to come in to work to address.

I don't, but I do think that an employer who expects his employees to be on call all the time is taking advantage. Off time should be off time where possible.

We accomadate employees with endless personal problems. Easily. Easily because we can communicate at any time. If you want your employer to be flexible, then you need to be flexibile too. If you want to work 9-5 with no exceptions ever, then work 9-5 with no exceptions ever. Fewer and fewer people choose that.

Ever since the internet, many people are working pretty much every waking hour. Many employers expect it.

Can you stand up to that pressure? Depends on the labor market, doesn't it? Supply and demand, it's not just for widgets.

There are very, very, very few salaries workers who only put in 40 hours a week that I'd consider "good" employees. If you aren't putting in at least 50 hours a week, you aren't working hard enough.

M'eh. I disagree. With commisioned sales, the bottom line is the bottom line and nobody anymore gives a damn about them being in the office 2-6 hours on average, 3 or 4 days a week. They might be on customer calls, emails, visits the other times or maybe they are at a nudie bar. Nobody knows, nobody cares. Our best salesperson doesn't like being at work because people bother him all the time. At home, he can be on the laptop and smart phone and get more $#@! done.

With the non-coms, I see more vaue in the ability to delegate work to hourly employees than to simply overwork yourself. Both are valuable, one is more valuable (but not always easy to do).

A smart phone is also the "everything is OK alarm" but much quieter. I don't have to be at work to know everything is OK, because I'll be called or emailed or texted if something comes up. $#@! the Germans (not literally as that results in more Germans).

[jonhowe]

If you read it carefully, this is only for employees of the labor ministry.

[gwax23]

If you read it carefully, this is only for employees of the labor ministry.

Bureaucrats passing laws to make their lives easier. Seems legit.

[Natural Citizen]

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/germany-b...461070-79.html



General Politics because... there needs to be a Law against EVERYTHING?

Do you really buy this logic for shutting down communication in this area, Damian?


Hey, you know, Russia just bought a crap load of typwriters. http://www.businessinsider.com/russi...-spying-2014-3

Also... How Much Is NSA Spying Costing In Lost Productivity?

angelatc is right.