Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 53

Thread: Rand Paul builds 50-state network, courts mainstream support for presidential bid

  1. #1

    Rand Paul builds 50-state network, courts mainstream support for presidential bid

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...985_story.html

    Quote Originally Posted by The Washington Post
    Sen. Rand Paul has become the first Republican to assemble a network in all 50 states as a precursor to a 2016 presidential run, the latest sign that he is looking to build a more mainstream coalition than the largely ad hoc one that backed his father’s unsuccessful campaigns.

    Paul’s move, which comes nearly two years before the 2016 primaries, also signals an effort to win the confidence of skeptical members of the Republican establishment, many of whom doubt that his appeal will translate beyond the libertarian base that was attracted to Ron Paul, the former Texas congressman.

    Rand Paul’s nationwide organization, which counts more than 200 people, includes new backers who have previously funded more traditional Republicans, along with longtime libertarian activists. Paul, of Kentucky, has also been courting Wall Street titans and Silicon Valley entrepreneurs who donated to the presidential campaigns of George W. Bush and Mitt Romney, attending elite conclaves in Utah and elsewhere along with other GOP hopefuls.

    For the rest of this year, his national team’s chief duties will be to take the lead in their respective states in planning fundraisers and meet-ups and helping Paul’s Washington-based advisers get a sense of where support is solid and where it’s not. This is especially important in key early primary battlegrounds, such as Iowa and New Hampshire, and in areas rich in GOP donors, such as Dallas and Chicago.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    ....but didn't WaPo (or was it Politico?) just push an article saying that Rand Paul isn't doing enough to build his network?

    Gee, you mean to say that might have just been a hit piece?

    Incidentally, yuck:
    "“David Axelrod wasn’t David Axelrod until he was,” Axelrod said."
    Last edited by KingNothing; 03-27-2014 at 08:47 AM.

  4. #3
    Chicago is "rich in GOP donors"? who knew.

    Overall, this is good news being reported out of the WaPo.

    Be sure to click the link. Lots of names dropped as joining his national Rand Paul Victory team, and lining up as potential deep-pocketed donors. Per Nate Morris, "Among donors, there’s a fever out there, people are looking to rebrand the party and they haven’t yet been tapped."

    Game On!
    The bigger government gets, the smaller I wish it was.
    My new motto: More Love, Less Laws

  5. #4
    I copied the entire article here, because I think it'll be good to reference in the future.

    Don't just read it here, though -- click the link!

    Sen. Rand Paul has become the first Republican to assemble a network in all 50 states as a precursor to a 2016 presidential run, the latest sign that he is looking to build a more mainstream coalition than the largely ad hoc one that backed his father’s unsuccessful campaigns.

    Paul’s move, which comes nearly two years before the 2016 primaries, also signals an effort to win the confidence of skeptical members of the Republican establishment, many of whom doubt that his appeal will translate beyond the libertarian base that was attracted to Ron Paul, the former Texas congressman.

    Rand Paul’s nationwide organization, which counts more than 200 people, includes new backers who have previously funded more traditional Republicans, along with longtime libertarian activists. Paul, of Kentucky, has also been courting Wall Street titans and Silicon Valley entrepreneurs who donated to the presidential campaigns of George W. Bush and Mitt Romney, attending elite conclaves in Utah and elsewhere along with other GOP hopefuls.

    For the rest of this year, his national team’s chief duties will be to take the lead in their respective states in planning fundraisers and meet-ups and helping Paul’s Washington-based advisers get a sense of where support is solid and where it’s not. This is especially important in key early primary battlegrounds, such as Iowa and New Hampshire, and in areas rich in GOP donors, such as Dallas and Chicago.

    “A national leadership team is an important step, and it’s a critical one for the movement going forward,” said Fritz Wenzel, Paul’s pollster. “Rand has tremendous momentum, and the formation of this team will guide him as he gets closer to a decision and [will] serve as a foundation for a campaign.”

    A growing number of Republicans have started to consider presidential campaigns. Aides to New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) are sketching out how possible bids could look and keeping tabs on donors and potential staffers. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Rick Santorum, a distant runner-up to Romney in the 2012 race for the GOP nomination, have been wooing conservative leaders.

    At this early juncture, Paul is consistently at or near the top in polling. A CNN/ORC International survey this month found that 16 percent of Republicans and independents who lean Republican were likely to support Paul, putting him at the front of the Republican field. Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), the 2012 GOP vice-presidential nominee, was second, at 15 percent.

    Paul’s leadership team is set up as part of Rand Paul Victory, a group that pools donations. It is a joint committee that overlaps the fundraising efforts of Rand PAC, Paul’s political-action committee, and Rand Paul 2016, his Senate campaign, and it is described by Paul aides as the basis for a presidential campaign.

    “There are people in every state who have joined Team Paul, with the money people ready to go,” said Mallory Factor, a consultant and South Carolina Republican who has worked with Paul to expand the senator’s footprint.

    Kevin Madden, a former adviser to Romney and House Republican leaders, said the development of a national network was a notable moment in pre-primary positioning.

    “This framework of supporters is an important building block in the architecture required to build a competitive national campaign,” Madden said. “What looks like just a name is often someone who knows local reporters, has a fundraising network or has an ability or history of organizing party activists.”

    Democrats are closely watching Paul as he moves to become less of a fringe figure than his father, who struggled to resonate with Republicans beyond his fervent base.

    David Axelrod, director of the Institute for Politics at the University of Chicago and a former strategist for President Obama, said, “He’s certainly creating buzz, and when I saw him at Romney’s donor meeting in Utah, it showed seriousness behind what he’s trying to do, beyond all he’s done from a message standpoint.”

    Axelrod dismissed the criticism of those consultants in both parties who have said Paul needs to enlist more veteran hands and tap a well-known Republican strategist with deep presidential campaign experience.

    “David Axelrod wasn’t David Axelrod until he was,” Axelrod said.

    At the Romney retreat last year in Park City, Utah, Paul gained some fans among the GOP elite. Though few pledged to back him should he run for president, they did warm up to him.

    “Going in, people weren’t sure. Most of them didn’t know him,” recalled Ron Kaufman, a Romney confidant. “But they had these one-on-one meetings with him and came away saying he’s a sharp guy. They were still in the grieving stage, not ready to think about 2016, but their opinion of him increased rather dramatically.”

    Nevertheless, many Republicans question whether Paul can build a campaign that could win a national election.

    “I think he’s dangerously irresponsible,” said Rep. Peter T. King (R-N.Y.), who is mulling his own presidential bid and has been critical of the GOP’s tea party wing, including Cruz.“I can’t believe responsible Republicans will support this guy, who’s a modern version of Charles Lindbergh.”

    The decision to swiftly expand and announce Paul’s national political infrastructure — which will be fully unveiled this spring — comes after reports describing Paul’s operation as unready to compete nationally.

    But it was finalized this month at a meeting at a Hampton Inn in Oxon Hill, Md., during the Conservative Political Action Conference. Speaking to more than 40 members of Paul’s circle, his strategists emphasized consolidating the sprawling support Paul has amassed into a coordinated apparatus.


    Paul, who also spoke, said he will not make a final decision on a run until the end of the year, but he indicated that he is leaning toward getting into the race and wants a well-staffed political operation to move on all fronts — fundraising, advertising, Internet presence and volunteer coordination — if he does.

    Paul’s national team plans to huddle once every quarter, with weekly calls between the meetings. Foreign policy advisers, such as former ambassador Richard Burt and Lorne Craner, a former State Department official, are expected to be part of the chain of command.

    Joe Lonsdale, a hedge-fund manager, is also onboard, as is Ken Garschina, a principal at Mason Capital Management in New York. So are Donald and Phillip Huffines, brothers and Texas real estate developers; Atlanta investor Lane Moore; and Frayda Levy, a board member at conservative advocacy groups Americans for Prosperity and the Club for Growth.

    From the state parties, outgoing Iowa GOP chairman A.J. Spiker and former Nevada GOP chairman James Smack have signed on, and a handful of Republican officials are preparing to join once their terms expire, including Robert Graham, chairman of the Arizona Republican Party.

    Drew Ivers, a former Iowa GOP chairman and Paul supporter, said Paul is “seriously building” a Hawkeye State network, but said much of the activity has gone unnoticed by Washington observers because it is mostly on social media. “In June 2007, Ron Paul’s name identification was zero,” Ivers said. “These days, 95 percent of Iowa Republicans know Rand Paul.”

    Paul’s chief political adviser, Doug Stafford, and his fundraising director, Erika Sather, will manage the bolstered organization. Their challenge will be to construct a presidential-level operation that is able to court both the family’s long-standing grass-roots activists as and wealthy donors.

    Sather, a former development director at the Club for Growth, spent much of the winter introducing Paul to donors beyond the rich libertarians who poured more than $40 million into Ron Paul’s 2012 presidential campaign. Stafford, a former adviser to several conservative groups, has mined the donor lists of the Campaign for Liberty, FreedomWorks and other advocacy organizations.


    Cathy Bailey and Nate Morris, two prominent GOP fundraisers from Kentucky, were also instrumental in bringing the group together.

    Morris, previously a fundraiser for George W. Bush, has served as Paul’s guide as the freshman senator has navigated steakhouse dinners and tony receptions with Wall Street and Silicon Valley leaders.

    “The bones for the network are there,” Morris said. “We’ll take that and bring in new talent, people who could be like Spencer Zwick was for Mitt Romney’s on finance. Among donors, there’s a fever out there, people are looking to rebrand the party and they haven’t yet been tapped.”

    Last year, Rand Paul Victory raised $4.4 million, with nearly half of its fourth-quarter donations coming from high-dollar donors, typically those who give more than $500 and often contribute the legal limit.

    Paul’s pitch at these gatherings combined his antagonism toward the National Security Agency’s surveillance programs with a discussion of issues such as drug-sentencing reform and what he calls “crunchy conservatism,” a focus on the environment and civil liberties.

    In June, in a pilgrimage to Facebook’s headquarters in Palo Alto, Calif., Paul spoke with the company’s founder, Mark Zuckerberg, and wrote a Patrick Henry-inspired social-media message — “Give me liberty to post” — on a hallway chalkboard.

    Nurturing relationships with Bob Murray, a coal baron and former Romney bundler, former Bush bundler Jack Oliver, who is aligned with former Florida governor Jeb Bush, and Blakely Page, an associate of billionaire industrialists Charles and David Koch, has been a priority.

    Those big-name donors have yet to sign on with any potential Republican candidate, but Paul’s supporters believes the formation of a leadership team could entice them, or at least signal Paul’s seriousness to them.

    Billionaire Peter Thiel, the cofounder of PayPal, is another looming figure in Paul’s constellation of friends, advisers, and possible bundlers. He stays in touch with Paul, occasionally meets with him, and is one of his top West Coast allies. Another is San Francisco businessman John Dennis, who once ran for Congress against Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), the current House minority leader.


    Jesse Benton, Ron Paul’s former campaign manager who is running Sen. Mitch McConnell’s reelection campaign in Kentucky, and Trygve Olson, a Paul ally and an adviser to American Crossroads, a Karl Rove-affiliated super PAC, are two more Paul supporters who could join his camp after the midterm elections. Rex Elsass, who has worked for Ohio Gov. John Kasich (R), has agreed to serve as Paul’s media strategist.
    The bigger government gets, the smaller I wish it was.
    My new motto: More Love, Less Laws

  6. #5
    hes catching on im....oh no!
    FLIP THOSE FLAGS, THE NATION IS IN DISTRESS!


    why I should worship the state (who apparently is the only party that can possess guns without question).
    The state's only purpose is to kill and control. Why do you worship it? - Sola_Fide

    Baptiste said.
    At which point will Americans realize that creating an unaccountable institution that is able to pass its liability on to tax-payers is immoral and attracts sociopaths?

  7. #6
    What can I do? How does one get linked into the organization?
    +
    'These things I command you, that you love one another.' - Jesus Christ

  8. #7

  9. #8
    "At the Romney retreat last year in Park City, Utah, Paul gained some fans among the GOP elite. Though few pledged to back him should he run for president, they did warm up to him.

    “Going in, people weren’t sure. Most of them didn’t know him,” recalled Ron Kaufman, a Romney confidant. “But they had these one-on-one meetings with him and came away saying he’s a sharp guy. They were still in the grieving stage, not ready to think about 2016, but their opinion of him increased rather dramatically.”'


    I think that Ron Paul made a deal for access to this network in 2012. Probably something like, I won't endorse, but Rand will. And I'll be nice to you during the debates.
    Non-violence is the creed of those that maintain a monopoly on force.



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by KingNothing View Post
    ....but didn't WaPo (or was it Politico?) just push an article saying that Rand Paul isn't doing enough to build his network?
    Gee, you mean to say that might have just been a hit piece?
    It was the NY times. And as we both suggested, it sounds like it was a hit piece.
    http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...Want-2016-Plan

    I suspect this article was fed or written as an indirect response to that.

  12. #10
    "introducing Paul to donors beyond the rich libertarians who poured more than $40 million into Ron Paul’s 2012 presidential campaign"

    say what? lol

  13. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by newbitech View Post
    "introducing Paul to donors beyond the rich libertarians who poured more than $40 million into Ron Paul’s 2012 presidential campaign"

    say what? lol
    Must be thinking of you

  14. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by TER View Post
    What can I do? How does one get linked into the organization?
    This.

  15. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by newbitech View Post
    "introducing Paul to donors beyond the rich libertarians who poured more than $40 million into Ron Paul’s 2012 presidential campaign"

    say what? lol
    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

  16. #14
    Account Restricted. Admin to review account standing


    Posts
    28,739
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Quote Originally Posted by limequat View Post
    "At the Romney retreat last year in Park City, Utah, Paul gained some fans among the GOP elite. Though few pledged to back him should he run for president, they did warm up to him.

    “Going in, people weren’t sure. Most of them didn’t know him,” recalled Ron Kaufman, a Romney confidant. “But they had these one-on-one meetings with him and came away saying he’s a sharp guy. They were still in the grieving stage, not ready to think about 2016, but their opinion of him increased rather dramatically.”'


    I think that Ron Paul made a deal for access to this network in 2012. Probably something like, I won't endorse, but Rand will. And I'll be nice to you during the debates.
    Most likely. Ron knew it was a fait accompli. He was never going to be the nominee. Best to advance the ball forward.

  17. #15
    Sign me up...
    There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.
    -Major General Smedley Butler, USMC,
    Two-Time Congressional Medal of Honor Winner
    Author of, War is a Racket!

    It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours.
    - Diogenes of Sinope

  18. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by jllundqu View Post
    Sign me up...
    Sign up yourself. Get involved NOW. Show up to the GOP functions and parades. Make yourself known and trusted BEFORE the primaries start for 2016!
    Few men have virtue enough to withstand the highest bidder. ~GEORGE WASHINGTON, letter, Aug. 17, 1779

    Quit yer b*tching and whining and GET INVOLVED!!



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  20. #17

  21. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by KingNothing View Post
    ....but didn't WaPo (or was it Politico?) just push an article saying that Rand Paul isn't doing enough to build his network?

    Gee, you mean to say that might have just been a hit piece?

    Incidentally, yuck:
    "“David Axelrod wasn’t David Axelrod until he was,” Axelrod said."
    That was in response to this:
    David Axelrod, director of the Institute for Politics at the University of Chicago and a former strategist for President Obama, said, “He’s certainly creating buzz, and when I saw him at Romney’s donor meeting in Utah, it showed seriousness behind what he’s trying to do, beyond all he’s done from a message standpoint.”
    Axelrod dismissed the criticism of those consultants in both parties who have said Paul needs to enlist more veteran hands and tap a well-known Republican strategist with deep presidential campaign experience.
    I don't like David Axelrod either, but he still made a good point.

  22. #19

  23. #20
    kinda makes me wonder if this wasn't true all along.
    The bigger government gets, the smaller I wish it was.
    My new motto: More Love, Less Laws

  24. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by georgiaboy View Post
    I copied the entire article here, because I think it'll be good to reference in the future.

    Don't just read it here, though -- click the link!
    No Matt Collins?

  25. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by compromise View Post
    No Matt Collins?
    He's their secret weapon ...

    The Bastiat Collection · FREE PDF · FREE EPUB · PAPER
    Frédéric Bastiat (1801-1850)

    • "When law and morality are in contradiction to each other, the citizen finds himself in the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense, or of losing his respect for the law."
      -- The Law (p. 54)
    • "Government is that great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
      -- Government (p. 99)
    • "[W]ar is always begun in the interest of the few, and at the expense of the many."
      -- Economic Sophisms - Second Series (p. 312)
    • "There are two principles that can never be reconciled - Liberty and Constraint."
      -- Harmonies of Political Economy - Book One (p. 447)

    · tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito ·

  26. #23
    All I want to know is, will Benton be involved again?

  27. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Maltheus View Post
    All I want to know is, will Benton be involved again?
    Yes, this is something people are going to accept along with the fact that if we are going to be serious contenders in the biggest and most expensive race that exists in this country, then many more consultants will have to be brought in to win. There are only so many qualified presidential election experts in this country and if we want to win, we will have to pick some of them. That is the reality.
    THE SQUAD of RPF
    1. enhanced_deficit - Paid Troll / John Bolton book promoter
    2. Devil21 - LARPing Wizard, fake magical script reader
    3. Firestarter - Tax Troll; anti-tax = "criminal behavior"
    4. TheCount - Comet Pizza Pedo Denier <-- sick

    @Ehanced_Deficit's real agenda on RPF =troll:

    Who spends this much time copy/pasting the same recycled links, photos/talking points.

    7 yrs/25k posts later RPF'ers still respond to this troll



  28. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  29. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Maltheus View Post
    All I want to know is, will Benton be involved again?
    Quote Originally Posted by eleganz View Post
    Yes, this is something people are going to accept along with the fact that if we are going to be serious contenders in the biggest and most expensive race that exists in this country, then many more consultants will have to be brought in to win. There are only so many qualified presidential election experts in this country and if we want to win, we will have to pick some of them. That is the reality.
    Well, yeah, sure, but ... what has any of that got to do with Jesse Benton?

  30. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by cajuncocoa View Post
    That was in response to this:


    I don't like David Axelrod either, but he still made a good point.
    But he still referred to himself in the third person twice in one sentence!

  31. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by specsaregood View Post
    It was the NY times. And as we both suggested, it sounds like it was a hit piece.
    http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...Want-2016-Plan

    I suspect this article was fed or written as an indirect response to that.

    So we basically know that Jeremy W Peters and Jonathan Martin are shills for people who don't like Rand Paul. Add two more to the list of... erm... interesting "journalists."

    We should keep track of this stuff. It'd be interesting to see who besides the obvious and more nefarious hacks dislike us.

  32. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by eleganz View Post
    Yes, this is something people are going to accept along with the fact that if we are going to be serious contenders in the biggest and most expensive race that exists in this country, then many more consultants will have to be brought in to win. There are only so many qualified presidential election experts in this country and if we want to win, we will have to pick some of them. That is the reality.
    Putting aside the questionable notion that Benton is qualified, it's been hard enough keeping people in the party, much less committed to their precinct leader positions. It was bad enough trying to make do with what we had after our most experienced '08ers wouldn't come back. None of the remaining organizers I know will go through this again, if Benton is in the picture. And definitely not if we get the same state coordinator again (who is simply not welcome in my county again, after lying and stabbing so many in the back).

  33. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by Maltheus View Post
    Putting aside the questionable notion that Benton is qualified, it's been hard enough keeping people in the party, much less committed to their precinct leader positions. It was bad enough trying to make do with what we had after our most experienced '08ers wouldn't come back. None of the remaining organizers I know will go through this again, if Benton is in the picture. And definitely not if we get the same state coordinator again (who is simply not welcome in my county again, after lying and stabbing so many in the back).
    You're telling the wrong people, I think. Probably more effective to have Rand's ear on this one. Like I said, it is a reality whether most of us like it or not. It doesn't matter if he is qualified or not to be in the campaign, he will be in the campaign. I never said he is qualified, I just said it is something people will have to accept along with the fact that other outsider consultants will be brought on (whether WE agree or not).
    THE SQUAD of RPF
    1. enhanced_deficit - Paid Troll / John Bolton book promoter
    2. Devil21 - LARPing Wizard, fake magical script reader
    3. Firestarter - Tax Troll; anti-tax = "criminal behavior"
    4. TheCount - Comet Pizza Pedo Denier <-- sick

    @Ehanced_Deficit's real agenda on RPF =troll:

    Who spends this much time copy/pasting the same recycled links, photos/talking points.

    7 yrs/25k posts later RPF'ers still respond to this troll

  34. #30
    Exciting!!

    Looking to get involved locally.

    Rand, Rock On!!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-21-2015, 03:38 PM
  2. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-12-2015, 06:55 PM
  3. Rand Paul builds support in the Northeast, wins straw poll
    By Constitutional Paulicy in forum Rand Paul Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-28-2014, 11:17 AM
  4. Rand Paul's Audit the Fed Bill Gains Mainstream Support
    By CaseyJones in forum Rand Paul Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-04-2013, 11:28 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •