The purpose of free speech is to assure that information vital to survival is shared and understood.
Do you accept that root definition as an American seeking to defend the constitution and restore constitutional government?
Yea, brainy question huh?
Unity didn't say how many brains we need to occupy its omnipotent body that might be termed the tyranny of the masses by dictators being democratically. lawfully, peacefully, overthrown. Unity just said we need to agree in the greatest numbers possible to "alter or abolish" abusive government.
Functional unity said the agreement needs to be upon prime constitutional intent if "the people are the rightful masters of the congress and the courts."
If you are a sincere American you feel a need to see the congress and the courts respect every letter of the constitution, all the way to Article V, and, you are not afraid of using that right, BECAUSE you know you, all of you, WE, can agree; and become the rightful masters.
And, those that cannot accept the absolute of the root definition of free speech are not sincere enough to defend the constitution. They may catch on, then again, they may not be sincere. This is the internet, making this the only way to know for sure.
I do not see any functional political movements that have inherent security for the constitution. The psyops, cognitive infiltration has turned social activism into a sitcom, soap opera, game show, un-reality show.
This thread is the cure, if there is to be one without existing authority assuring information needed for survival is shared and understood. Good luck depending on them for manifesting constitutional intent in defense of the constitution and restoratation of constitutional government. They are interested in power, campaign contributions and big pay.
____________________
This is how it works:
I state;
I Christopher A. Brown accept that the purpose of free speech is that information vital to survival be shared and understood.
I start a list with my username:
1.Christopher A. Brown
User John Doe see's this thread, agrees, wants other sincere Americans to know he is sincere, then copies and pastes the acceptance into a reply.
I state, I John Doe accept that the purpose of free speech is that information vital to survival be shared and understood.
John copies and pastes the last post of the augmented list, and adds his username.
1.Christopher A. Brown
2.John Doe
Is there any point is discussing constitutional defense and restoration of constitutional government with Americans that are not sincere?
This is about un conditional defense of the constitution.
___________________
Note: This is an experiment which has determined that social fear levels are too great for ANY users here to directly post accceptance of the root definition of free speech. [EDIT:Title change 3//14. Original title too contentious.] Therefore in order to create a list of who can be trusted in discussion which is directed at restoration of constitutional government, in this derisive environment created by "cognitive infiltration, (see link)
http://www.salon.com/2010/01/15/sunstein_2/
I have been forced to "read between the lines" and determine the basic intent of posters here. On page 7 of this thread I've posted my reasons for what some have termed an intent to divide users here. That is not the case, but separating the sincere from the covert insincere is vital IF we are to unify for effective constitutional defense.
Since there was no over acceptance of the definition of purpose of free speech, but a great deal of derisive, rejection of the effort, one can only logically assume that those posters are not sincere, and since there are more of them than the sincere, a list of insincere Americans has been created.
These methods are not fool proof and errors can be made and have been made, but the list is amended to respect the true intents perceived. Any who think they are on the wrong list can post to correct that with either direct acceptance of the purpose of free speech, or perhaps otherwise.
From my observations of those on the sincere list, I do not think I've made errors there. See page 7 for justifications of this effort.
___________________
ON EDIT:-CURRENT LIST 8/07/15
NOTE The strike through indicates that there has been some agreement, OR, that posting tendencies, subject matter, avoidance of criticism of the basic agreement etc. indicate confusion and uncertainty rather than covert manipulator status.
Sincere Americans:
1. Christopher A. Brown
2. DamianTV
3. ClydeCoulter
4. Danke
5. Spikender
6. Mini-me
PROBATIONARY STATUS-Psychological issue? confused, or personal agenda placed over unconditional support for Americans prime constitutional right to alter or abolish.
1. Wizard Watson
InSiNcErE AmErIcAns:
1. CPUd
2. Occam's Banana
3. acptulsa
4. Cutlerzzz
5. phill4paul
6. Ronintruth
7. Gunnyfreedom
8.[uAnti Federalist[/u]
9. pcosmar
10.Ronin Truth
NOTE ON EDIT-List update 8/07/15
Reading between the lines to determine sincerity IS NOT efficient or necessarily fool proof. Realize, only one poster has posted direct acceptance of the purpose of free speech. Wizard Watson, which apparently was to gain alliance for a person agenda having religious connotations. Whereupon when the religious position was not carried by myself, support turned into attack. This created the need for the Probationary Status.
Time should tell if Watson can see the need for American unity and that my inability to engage his religious position is not a rejection of those beliefs, or, if the agreement was a ploy to be used in efforts to marginalize the process of demonstrating the need for this kind of overt agreement to create secure, real unity in support of the 1787 constitution.
Anti fed and pcosmar showed their clear teamwork abusing the reputation system of the forum with philpaul and Occam's Banana, they are back on the insincere list. The level of manipulation I see here is astounding and fits perfectly within the jtrig GCHQ training info released by Snowden. I wonder when sincere users are going to begin to realize what they're subjected to.
Ronin truth belonged on the insincere list long ago, but it is my conclusion that ther are many factions infiltrating and many started with childhood programming. I recall Ronin from the OCTOBER 2011 forum and the devout socialist position rejecting all rights under the constitution. Despite the fact those are enjoyed, even in the serious decline of America.
So we only have perhaps 2 or 3 actual covert infiltrating groups that operate in some general unity. But they are all aligned AGAINST the constitution in the BELIEF that it is somehow the same as thx US government. All fail to observe the act of 1871 however.
At this point there are only three logical reasons for those on the sincere list to NOT have posted such acceptance.
A. Fear-either social fear of breaking ranks from their social group.
B. Fear of the infiltrated gov and that overt support for this, first step of the process here.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...=1#post5433668
Will mark them for gov persecution.
C. Some or all are pretending to be supportive of the concept and hoping that the failure to accept this natural law definition will induce A or B in the lurking public.
D. Psychological preoccupation with alternative agenda personally used to justify inconsistent support for prime constitutional rights and a lawful, peaceful revolution.
The whole idea of this thread is to show how ambiguity does not work for constititional defense. Realize that the infiltration of the government seeking to dispose of the constitution ONLY has to prevent citizens from using or engaging a method which will be effective at stopping them. That is exactly what the insincere are doing, whether they know it or not.
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us