Anyone who opposes Obama is a racist, that must die (Oprah says)

[Influenza]

You're so edgy that you can't even detect hyberbole.

Most of your material I see you post is all the leftist stuff that just happens to coincide with liberty. Nothing truly remarkably liberty about that. And that's when you're not supporting leftists or taking shots at the Paul family, like in these posts of yours:

"[Jill] Stein in particular was also able to articulate her ideas..."

"Don't worry Rand's gonna cut down on aid to Pakistan so that number will be reduced to 664 Billion!!! #winning"


"I just think it's [Islam] more correct than all the others."

"Obama doesn't pose a threat to the US."

LOL you really need to get a life. My ideas are far more "liberty friendly" than trump supporting christian-taliban types like yourself. But good job quoting my post from 2014. Really is strange how my posts now are a bit different than they were in the past. It's almost as if my ideas change as I encounter new information over time. Can't say the same about most others on this forum

So let me see what exactly you have a problem with. I said I liked the green party on foreign policy and I thought Stein did a better job than Johnson at explaining herself and staying true to her principles. Where's the problem?

Rand is a politician, and he constantly plays the political game. In that aspect, he's nothing like his father. I lost most of my respect for him anyways after he endorsed lunatic Roy Moore (even before it was known that he was a sexual predator)

I already basically addressed the islam one but yes, my beliefs when i was ~18 aren't the same as what they are now

And then you found a problem for me saying that obama himself is a puppet. And I actually got +rep on that post from the most anti-Obama poster on this forum, enhanced_deficit. LOL you are an idiot dude

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

LOL you really need to get a life. My ideas are far more "liberty friendly" than trump supporting christian-taliban types like yourself. But good job quoting my post from 2014. Really is strange how my posts now are a bit different than they were in the past. It's almost as if my ideas change as I encounter new information over time. Can't say the same about most others on this forum

So let me see what exactly you have a problem with. I said I liked the green party on foreign policy and I thought Stein did a better job than Johnson at explaining herself and staying true to her principles. Where's the problem?

Rand is a politician, and he constantly plays the political game. In that aspect, he's nothing like his father. I lost most of my respect for him anyways after he endorsed lunatic Roy Moore (even before it was known that he was a sexual predator)

I already basically addressed the islam one but yes, my beliefs when i was ~18 aren't the same as what they are now

And then you found a problem for me saying that obama himself is a puppet. And I actually got +rep on that post from the most anti-Obama poster on this forum, enhanced_deficit. LOL you are an idiot dude

Thanks for confirming what I figured about you. Nice try, though.

[Influenza]

Thanks for confirming what I figured about you. Nice try, though.

you haven't figured anything out about me besides what I have already explained above (which shouldn't be too heinous?). You are one of the most idiotic posters on this forum, only people in competition with you are timosman and swordsmyth

[Influenza]

Oh and to answer your previous question that you edited in: I've never voted in my life and don't have any plans to do so

[angelatc]

One of our own RPF members fantasized about watching leftists starve to death in the streets just for being political opponents (which is certainly a step or two worse than Oprah's comments), and no one besides me had anything negative to say about it.

Sucks to be you, then.

[Influenza]

Sucks to be you.

You are gaining allies!

Be my guest fool!

If only they would all decide to kill themselves for social justice.

Unfortunately the average IQ of your clique just sharply decreased =\

[Madison320]

I think that comment was taken way out of context. I'm sure she didn't mean old white people have to be exterminated. She meant that there's no way to change their minds so we just have to wait until they die. It's similar to the old republicans who want the death penalty for smoking a joint. There's no way to convince them. We just have to wait until they die so we can legalize weed or other drugs.

Now that being said Oprah would probably be a horrific presidential candidate. I'm sure she's probably about as anti-property rights as Bernie Sanders.

[Swordsmyth]

I think that comment was taken way out of context. I'm sure she didn't mean old white people have to be exterminated. She meant that there's no way to change their minds so we just have to wait until they die. It's similar to the old republicans who want the death penalty for smoking a joint. There's no way to convince them. We just have to wait until they die so we can legalize weed or other drugs.

Now that being said Oprah would probably be a horrific presidential candidate. I'm sure she's probably about as anti-property rights as Bernie Sanders.

Oprah Winfrey met in secret with George Soros and other billionaires to discuss a plan to depopulate the world.
The 2009 meeting in Manhattan, organized by Bill Gates, was so discreet that the billionaires’ aides were told to treat it as a “security briefing,” and attendees also included the late David Rockefeller, Warren Buffett, Ted Turner and Michael Bloomberg, in addition to Oprah and Soros.
“Taking their cue from Gates, they agreed that overpopulation was a priority,” reported The Sunday Times in describing the meeting, which revolved around population reduction starting with third-world countries.

More at: https://www.infowars.com/scandal-opr...dential-hopes/

[Influenza]

I think that comment was taken way out of context. I'm sure she didn't mean old white people have to be exterminated. She meant that there's no way to change their minds so we just have to wait until they die. It's similar to the old republicans who want the death penalty for smoking a joint. There's no way to convince them. We just have to wait until they die so we can legalize weed or other drugs.

Now that being said Oprah would probably be a horrific presidential candidate. I'm sure she's probably about as anti-property rights as Bernie Sanders.

Did someone actually think that's what she meant? Jeez people here might be more retarded than I thought

[Madison320]

Oprah Winfrey met in secret with George Soros and other billionaires to discuss a plan to depopulate the world.
The 2009 meeting in Manhattan, organized by Bill Gates, was so discreet that the billionaires’ aides were told to treat it as a “security briefing,” and attendees also included the late David Rockefeller, Warren Buffett, Ted Turner and Michael Bloomberg, in addition to Oprah and Soros.
“Taking their cue from Gates, they agreed that overpopulation was a priority,” reported The Sunday Times in describing the meeting, which revolved around population reduction starting with third-world countries.

More at: https://www.infowars.com/scandal-opr...dential-hopes/

C'mon man. Alex Jones? Secret meetings? You're smarter than that. Unless that was sarcasm.

[Swordsmyth]

C'mon man. Alex Jones? Secret meetings? You're smarter than that. Unless that was sarcasm.

Have you ever heard of the Georgia guidestones?

[Madison320]

Have you ever heard of the Georgia guidestones?

Nope.

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

you haven't figured anything out about me

I didn't have to figure it out. You gave yourself away.

Say hi to your employer Soros for me.

[Swordsmyth]

Nope.

Look them up.

The elite have long planned massive depopulation.

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

Hey Influenza,

Did you write your "report" yet?

Nice Soros touch, chief. LOL

[Todd]

I think that comment was taken way out of context. I'm sure she didn't mean old white people have to be exterminated. She meant that there's no way to change their minds so we just have to wait until they die. It's similar to the old republicans who want the death penalty for smoking a joint. There's no way to convince them. We just have to wait until they die so we can legalize weed or other drugs.

Now that being said Oprah would probably be a horrific presidential candidate. I'm sure she's probably about as anti-property rights as Bernie Sanders.

Yeah...probably going to get flamed for agreeing with you, but I think she was talking about how generational shifts create progress for lessening inherent racism.

[Danke]

C'mon man. Alex Jones? Secret meetings? You're smarter than that. Unless that was sarcasm.

http://pbble.com/Times-BillionaireCl...population.pdf

[Influenza]

I didn't have to figure it out. You gave yourself away.

Say hi to your employer Soros for me.

Really? You mean I'm being paid to have 680 posts in 4.5 years? What's that like, 3 posts a week? I must be ripping him off. I thought paid shills are supposed to be covert, try to gain people's trust and then slowly push their agendas when no one's looking. What a paid shill WOULDN'T do is exactly what I do - directly insult as many people as possible on this forum without getting banned. I think I may have hit half the active posters now, although my main targets left the forums: Christian Liberty, Sola Fide, hells_unicorn. The trumptards like yourself have replaced them

[donnay]

I think that comment was taken way out of context. I'm sure she didn't mean old white people have to be exterminated. She meant that there's no way to change their minds so we just have to wait until they die. It's similar to the old republicans who want the death penalty for smoking a joint. There's no way to convince them. We just have to wait until they die so we can legalize weed or other drugs.

Now that being said Oprah would probably be a horrific presidential candidate. I'm sure she's probably about as anti-property rights as Bernie Sanders.

Yes and the trustworth site Snopes says so too.

hxxps://www.snopes.com/oprah-winfrey-old-white-people-have-to-die/


Oprah is part of the global elites. But you believe whatever you want to believe.

SECRET BILLIONAIRE CLUB SEEKS POPULATION CONTROL
Gates, Rockefeller, Turner, Oprah, Buffett, Soros, Bloomberg attend meeting
Published: 05/24/2009 at 6:48 PM

WASHINGTON – Some of the richest men and women in the world met secretly recently in New York to conspire on using their vast wealth to bring the world’s population growth under control.

The meeting included some of the biggest names in the “billionaires club,” according to the London Times – Bill Gates, David Rockefeller, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey, Warren Buffett, George Soros and Michael Bloomberg.

The meeting at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel Prize-winning biochemist and president of Rockefeller University, was the inspiration of Gates and took place three weeks ago.

“The informal afternoon session was so discreet that some of the billionaires’ aides were told they were at ‘security briefings,'” the Times reported today.

Stacy Palmer, editor of the Chronicle of Philanthropy, speculated that the secrecy surrounding the meeting may have been due to concern that “they don’t want to be seen as a global cabal.”

Get the inside story on the globalist insiders who have been meeting for decades in highly guarded secret. Learn from author who penetrated Bilderbergers

According to the Times, the billionaires were each given 15 minutes to present their favorite cause. Over dinner they discussed how they might settle on an “umbrella cause” that could harness their interests. Taking their cue from Gates, the report said, they agreed population control was the No. 1 issue.

In February, Gates, 53, outlined an ambitious plan to cap global population at 8.3 billion – about one billion fewer than currently projected.

Patricia Stonesifer, former chief executive of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, said the billionaires would continue to meet over the next few months.

A guest at the meeting told the Times population growth would be addressed as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat.

“This is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers,” said the guest. “They need to be independent of government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all see looming.”

As to secrecy, the guest said, “They wanted to speak rich to rich without worrying anything they said would end up in the newspapers, painting them as an alternative world government.”

http://www.wnd.com/2009/05/99105/#mkOQm2fXEMduSjSZ.99

[Influenza]

Yes and the trustworth site Snopes says so too.

hxxps://www.snopes.com/oprah-winfrey-old-white-people-have-to-die/


Oprah is part of the global elites. But you believe whatever you want to believe.


http://www.wnd.com/2009/05/99105/#mkOQm2fXEMduSjSZ.99

Wat? That snopes link disagrees with you. No one intellectually honest believes something because they want to - they believe it because they are convinced by the available information.

Btw, off topic post now, I want to have a better understanding of your opinion on vaccines:

Do you think vaccines are bad because you think they don't work (i.e. injecting someone with some specific set of antigens doesn't help improve their immune system against a specific bacteria/virus) AND because you think they cause autism/other problems? Or is it just because you think they cause autism/other problems, but you admit that vaccines are good for improving the immune system?

[timosman]

Do you think vaccines are bad because you think they don't work (i.e. injecting someone with some specific set of antigens doesn't help improve their immune system against a specific bacteria/virus) AND because you think they cause autism/other problems? Or is it just because you think they cause autism/other problems, but you admit that vaccines are good for improving the immune system?

Derailing threads is a hard work. Do you ever get tired?

[Influenza]

Derailing threads is a hard work. Do you ever get tired?

We already solved Oprah's comments anyways. The only way people could honestly be offended by her remarks is if they are racists themselves and feel personally attacked. Madison320 was spot on

[donnay]

Wat? That snopes link disagrees with you. No one intellectually honest believes something because they want to - they believe it because they are convinced by the available information.

I figured out Oprah years ago, intellectually. I posted Snopes because the poster I was responding to sounded like the same explanation Snopes gave.

[Influenza]

I figured out Oprah years ago, intellectually. I posted Snopes because the poster I was responding to sounded like the same explanation Snopes gave.

Oh, at first I thought you might have actually found an argument that supported your interpretation of Oprah's quote. But instead you decided to discredit Madison320's argument by saying "Look these people I don't like said something similar about Oprah's comments, so you're wrong!" And to imagine, RPF has endured 32,138 posts with this level of logic and reason (none at all)

[Madison320]

Yes and the trustworth site Snopes says so too.

hxxps://www.snopes.com/oprah-winfrey-old-white-people-have-to-die/


Oprah is part of the global elites. But you believe whatever you want to believe.

I have know idea what Oprah does in secret and I don't give crap. For all I know Oprah meets with space aliens plotting the demise of earth every weekend. All I know is in that specific video she obviously meant when they die out, not that she wants to exterminate them.

[donnay]

I have know idea what Oprah does in secret and I don't give crap. For all I know Oprah meets with space aliens plotting the demise of earth every weekend. All I know is in that specific video she obviously meant when they die out, not that she wants to exterminate them.

You take it however you want, I watched the entire interview a few years back. I know what she said and in the context she said it. These philanthropist are dangerous and the bottom line is they think we are useless eaters.

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

Really? You mean I'm being paid to have 680 posts in 4.5 years?

People of your ilk often post infrequently. In fact, infrequent is the norm.

What's that like, 3 posts a week? I must be ripping him off. I thought paid shills are supposed to be covert, try to gain people's trust and then slowly push their agendas when no one's looking. What a paid shill WOULDN'T do is exactly what I do - directly insult as many people as possible on this forum without getting banned.

LOL. You remind of those guilty guys who say, No, I didn't do it, but if I did, then I would do it like this!

I think I may have hit half the active posters now,

No, you pretty much hit everybody. Your obvious left wing and often angry posting makes it very clear that you have a disdain for liberty, RPF members, and this forum.

[pcosmar]

We already solved Oprah's comments anyways. The only way people could honestly be offended by her remarks is if they are racists themselves and feel personally attacked. Madison320 was spot on

Yeah,, but I would not want her (or her ilk) deciding my health care options.

and she does want to.

[pcosmar]

We already solved Oprah's comments anyways. The only way people could honestly be offended by her remarks is if they are racists themselves and feel personally attacked. Madison320 was spot on

Yeah well Ok,,,

But I m still curious as to why you are defending this Racist Bitch.

And she is most certainly as racist as any white supremacist scum I have ever met.

It was a deliberately racist comment.. From a Racist.

[timosman]

Yeah well Ok,,,

But I m still curious as to why you are defending this Racist Bitch.

And she is most certainly as racist as any white supremacist scum I have ever met.

It was a deliberately racist comment.. From a Racist.

This is a team work. You have Influenza defending Oprah comments as non-racist while another sock puppet is accusing Trump of being racist because he said $#@!hole.