At my next council meeting we will be debating an ordinance on synthetic drugs so I wrote a speech I intend to give.
This is the first draft:
---------------------------------------------------------
I'm fairly certain that all of us agree that synthetic drug usage is harmful and has the potential to be fatal and I am also confident that every one of us would discourage people from using these drugs. To me, the discussion we are having and the reason I'm opposing this ordinance isn't the issue of synthetic drugs or the effects of using those drugs but rather, the discussion we should be having is the issue of Liberty.
In the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution, it states: "We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Liberty is once again mentioned in Section 1 of Amendment 14 of the U.S. Constitution when it states, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
The Declaration of Independence states, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
Following the American War of Independence, the Treaty of Paris was signed in 1783 that officially recognized the United States as an independent nation. In that Treaty, Liberty is mentioned multiple times, in Articles 3, 5, 6, and 7.
In 1863, President Abraham Lincoln gave one of the most significant speeches in U.S. History, The Gettysburg Address. In this speech, President Lincoln begins, "Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal."
In 1892, Francis Bellamy wrote a short pledge as a simple statement of loyalty and in 1942, Congress formally adopted his pledge to the flag and nation, the Pledge of Allegiance. At the beginning of every Council meeting, we stand and recite this Pledge; "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all."
On August 28, 1963, in one of the most famous speeches of all time, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. states in his "I Have A Dream" speech, "When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the unalienable rights to life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."
The issue I have with this ordinance is not one of synthetic drugs but liberty, the same liberty that I've just quoted from many sources of historical significance. So what exactly is Liberty? The definition of liberty states: " Freedom from arbitrary or despotic government or control. Freedom from external or foreign rule; independence. Freedom from control, interference, obligation, restriction, hampering conditions, etc.; power or right of doing, thinking, speaking, etc., according to choice. Freedom from captivity, confinement, or physical restraint."
Liberty.
We all have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
With that, we all have the liberty to come up with our own set of morals, beliefs, principles, thoughts and opinions but in the exercising of our liberty, we are not allowed to violate the liberties of others and force them to abide by our views. A vegetarian, who believes that eating meat is a horrific act, chooses to exercise his or her liberty and avoid the consuming of meat. This same vegetarian, can not, through legislation, violate the liberties of others and force the people who enjoy eating meat to no longer have the liberty to do just that. That also means that those who enjoy meat can not violate the liberty of the vegetarian by passing legislation mandating that they eat meat.
At this point, I'm sure some are questioning my analogy and thinking, "you can't possibly be comparing the act of eating vegetables or meat to that of using synthetic drugs?" I agree, the effects of vegetable consumption are far different from that of smoking synthetic marijuana, and I would never try to compare the two. While the objects in the analogy and in this ordinance, food and drugs, are different, the main issue is the same and that is Liberty. In both cases, one person or group are attempting to violate the liberty of another person or group and this is wrong.
There is no gray area in regards to liberty, liberty is a black or white issue. You either have liberty and freedom or you don't. I feel it would be extremely arrogant of us to think that we are somehow more intelligent, more mature and more capable of making your choices for you than you are. The government isn't here to run your life from cradle to grave and the notion that we, as elected officials, need to pass legislation to protect you from you, in my opinion is absurd. We all make choices for ourselves and with those choices come consequences. Sometimes those choices turn out okay but other times those choices don't work out, that's how it goes with liberty and freedom.
Every one of us up here, swore an oath to uphold the U.S Constitution and with that oath we are to defend the liberties of the citizens we were elected to represent. At the beginning of every Council meeting, we stand up and pledge our allegiance to the flag and with that, we pledge to defend "liberty and justice for all."
I ask that the Mayor and my fellow councilors stand with me in opposition to this ordinance. I ask that they stand by their oath to the U.S. Constitution and the principles of liberty it was written to protect. I ask that they stand by their pledge to the flag and the republic for which it stands and defend "Liberty and justice for all."
I know very well that the stance I'm taking, in opposition to this ordinance, may well have a negative effect on me. But I'm okay with that. I will always stand by my principles, the principles of freedom and liberty, not only for myself but for others and if standing by those principles causes harm to my reputation, than it's worth it because your liberty is more important.
---------------------------------------------------------
Any thoughts or suggestions?
- ML
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us