Ted Cruz unveils fool-proof plan: Invade Syria, destroy WMDs

[Nobexliberty]

Hope the syrians kill any invaders or enforcers of a "police action" and burn whatever nation who invaded to the ground.

[JCDenton0451]

compromise is conspicuously absent from this thread. lol

[69360]

Perhaps Colin Powell could be brought out of retirement to present a slide show and drawings showing where the WMD is hidden.

Better yet, I'd like to hear an explanation from our government of exactly what a WMD is nowadays. They call everything from a pressure cooker to a passenger airliner to a nuke one.

[Sola_Fide]

Did you read? Cruz doesn't want to give anyone arms in the Syrian war or become allies with either side. He seems to mistakenly think that US forces could just get the alleged WMD and leave.

It's not a mistake. He IS a George Bush style Republican. He is exactly what this movement is supposed to be fighting against.

[Carlybee]

It's not a mistake. He IS a George Bush style Republican. He is exactly what this movement is supposed to be fighting against.

He was a policy advisor on the Bush/Cheny campaign. Or so I read. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Cruz

[69360]

He was a policy advisor on the Bush/Cheny campaign. Or so I read. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Cruz

and Ron Paul campaigned for and was a delegate for Ronald Reagan.

We could play guilt by association all day, not that I think campaigning for Reagan is something to be guilty of, but I suspect you do.

[anaconda]

Sadly we need to give Mr. Cruz a taste of his own medicine and drop kick him to the curb for all eternity.

[belian78]

and Ron Paul campaigned for and was a delegate for Ronald Reagan.

We could play guilt by association all day, not that I think campaigning for Reagan is something to be guilty of, but I suspect you do.

I bit of difference between campaigning for a man that wanted to shrink gov and ended up being threatened with his life for it, and working for two of history's biggest evil pricks I'm afraid.

[69360]

I bit of difference between campaigning for a man that wanted to shrink gov and ended up being threatened with his life for it, and working for two of history's biggest evil pricks I'm afraid.

You mean Obama and Biden? See this could go on all day... and is pointless. Cruz is decent on most issues and works with Rand when they agree which is very often but not always. I think this is good.

[anaconda]

[LibertyEagle]

He was a policy advisor on the Bush/Cheny campaign. Or so I read. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Cruz

Wasn't Doug Wead an advisor of Dubya's?

People can change. I'm not saying Cruz did, but I'm far more concerned about the PAC he started and handed over to a Bush.

[belian78]

You mean Obama and Biden? See this could go on all day... and is pointless. Cruz is decent on most issues and works with Rand when they agree which is very often but not always. I think this is good.

Trolls usually can troll all day, yes. I don't care how many issues someone is 'ok' on. If they support interventionism and/or preemptive military action of any sort, they are not someone I want to support, or have in office.

[Carlybee]

and Ron Paul campaigned for and was a delegate for Ronald Reagan.

We could play guilt by association all day, not that I think campaigning for Reagan is something to be guilty of, but I suspect you do.

Not a huge Reagan fan but certainly would not put Bush in the same stratosphere. I was simply calling attention to his neocon roots.

[69360]

Wasn't Doug Wead an advisor of Dubya's?

People can change. I'm not saying Cruz did, but I'm far more concerned about the PAC he started and handed over to a Bush.

Both Bushes I believe. Guess he's guilty by association as well.

[enhanced_deficit]

What do you expect from a puppet as MAGA succinctly explained:





From:
Trump first self-funded POTUS & non-puppet of lobbies





Related

Will Kerry, McCain, Rafael Ted Cruz succeed in selling Syria military intervention?

“We know Assad has used these weapons, and there is good reason to suspect the al Qaida-affiliated rebels would use them as well if they could get their hands on them. This poses an intolerable threat not only to our friends in the region, but also to the United States. We need to be developing a clear, practical plan to go in, locate the weapons, secure or destroy them, and then get out. The United States should be firmly in the lead to make sure the job is done right.”- Rafael Cruz
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...83YwkLAp0#t=39




Ted Cruz: Attack ISIS in Iraq and Syria to protect Israel

[DamianTV]

Oh great, more WMD's. Didnt we hear this one already? Not as funny the second go around...

[Swordsmyth]

Oh great, more WMD's. Didnt we hear this one already? Not as funny the second go around...

It's old news, years old.

[Swordsmyth]

What do you expect from a puppet as MAGA succinctly explained:





From:
Trump first self-funded POTUS & non-puppet of lobbies





Related

Will Kerry, McCain, Rafael Ted Cruz succeed in selling Syria military intervention?

“We know Assad has used these weapons, and there is good reason to suspect the al Qaida-affiliated rebels would use them as well if they could get their hands on them. This poses an intolerable threat not only to our friends in the region, but also to the United States. We need to be developing a clear, practical plan to go in, locate the weapons, secure or destroy them, and then get out. The United States should be firmly in the lead to make sure the job is done right.”- Rafael Cruz
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...83YwkLAp0#t=39




Ted Cruz: Attack ISIS in Iraq and Syria to protect Israel

Just how is this multi year old news relevant?

[enhanced_deficit]

It's old news, years old.

As of few weeks ago, "NY bosses'" alleged poodle still had same interventionist stance and still appears to be in bed with GOP-Adelson/AIPAC money baggers' political slave masters:



Sen. Cruz Issues Statement on U.S. Missile Strikes in Syria
April 14, 2018

HOUSTON, Texas - U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) issued the following statement regarding the U.S.-launched missile strikes in Syria:
"Tonight, the United States responded to the atrocities of Bashar al-Assad.
"As the President said, it is in our national interest to deter the use of chemical weapons. Critically, that includes preventing those chemical weapons from falling into the hands of the radical Islamic terrorist elements in Syria. It is now absolutely crucial that any further military action we take in Syria remains focused on protecting the vital national security interests of our country.
"In addition to any military action that we may choose to take, we must also take action against Assad's financiers. We should withdraw from President Obama's disastrous Iran deal that is enriching the Iran government with billions of dollars, and those ill-gotten gains are in turn being funneled to Syria to prop up the Bashar regime.
"In the days ahead, I look forward to the President making the case to Congress and the American people that his proposed course of action in Syria is in the national security interests of this country. But tonight, our support and prayers are with the brave Americans in uniform, as well as our trusted allies in France and the U.K., who carried out these military strikes."

[Swordsmyth]

As of few weeks ago, "NY bosses'" alleged poodle still had same interventionist stance and still appears to be in bed with GOP-Adelson/AIPAC money baggers' political slave masters:



Sen. Cruz Issues Statement on U.S. Missile Strikes in Syria
April 14, 2018

HOUSTON, Texas - U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) issued the following statement regarding the U.S.-launched missile strikes in Syria:
"Tonight, the United States responded to the atrocities of Bashar al-Assad.
"As the President said, it is in our national interest to deter the use of chemical weapons. Critically, that includes preventing those chemical weapons from falling into the hands of the radical Islamic terrorist elements in Syria. It is now absolutely crucial that any further military action we take in Syria remains focused on protecting the vital national security interests of our country.
"In addition to any military action that we may choose to take, we must also take action against Assad's financiers. We should withdraw from President Obama's disastrous Iran deal that is enriching the Iran government with billions of dollars, and those ill-gotten gains are in turn being funneled to Syria to prop up the Bashar regime.
"In the days ahead, I look forward to the President making the case to Congress and the American people that his proposed course of action in Syria is in the national security interests of this country. But tonight, our support and prayers are with the brave Americans in uniform, as well as our trusted allies in France and the U.K., who carried out these military strikes."

That isn't what you posted above, what you posted above is years old.