Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: Rand Paul: Senate Is Arming Al-Qaeda and Rushing to War in Syria

  1. #1

    Rand Paul: Senate Is Arming Al-Qaeda and Rushing to War in Syria

    This is a good round up of the committee hearing this week when they voted for the Syria Transition Support Act.

    Notice Rubio is a LIAR saying he didn't think anyone voting for the bill would do so to arm Al Qeada. Who's he kidding? Al Qeada is the main fighting force against Assad and he's willing to give the CIA the power to decide who gets the money/weapons. The same CIA that hired the February 11th Martyr Brigade in Benghazi to protect their "consulate" and who ran like hell when the place came under attack. Yeah Rubio we can really trust the CIA to do such a wonderful job. You stupid neocon.

    Rubio loves giving the executive more power whether it's this or the immigration bill which grants DHS enormous powers. Then he talks out the other side of his mouth and condemns the IRS for targeting conservatives which has been made powerful precisely by this very same mentality in the Congress. He is really shameless.


    Rand Paul: Senate Is Arming Al-Qaeda and Rushing to War in Syria

    “This is an important moment. You will be funding, today, the allies of al Qaeda.”

    That was the declaration Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) made on May 21 during a hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Paul’s comments were directed at his colleagues, nearly all of whom voted to send arms to Syrian rebels.

    Senators Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) co-sponsored the bill that authorizes “critical support to the Syrian opposition through provision of military assistance, training, and additional humanitarian support.”

    The bill sailed through the committee, passing with bipartisan support by a vote of 15-3.

    Senator Paul offered two amendments to the bill — officially styled the Syria Transition Support Act — one that would have forbidden the transfer of weapons to the rebel forces fighting to oust the government of current Syrian president Bashar al-Asad, and another that would have prevented the use of U.S. military armed forces in Syria.

    Both of Paul’s amendments were rejected by the committee.

    Apart from supplying lethal and non-lethal weaponry to Syrian opposition forces, the Menendez-Corker bill contains several other regime-toppling provisions, all of which are boastfully reported by Mendendez on his website. They include:

    • “Creation of a $250 million transition fund each year through FY2015 drawn from funds otherwise appropriated for regional transition support”;

    • “Sanctions on arms and oil sales to Assad: Targeting any person that the President of the United States determines has knowingly participated in or facilitated a transaction related to the sale or transfer of military equipment, arms, petroleum, or petroleum products to the Assad regime.”; and

    • “Amendment to the Syria Accountability Act: To allow for sanctions removal once a transitional government is in place and certain terrorism and WMD criteria have been met.”

    Neither Paul’s warnings nor his amendments were enough to counteract the powerful politicians pushing to arm the Syrian rebels. A cadre of lawmakers from seemingly distinct bands of the political spectrum lined up behind the move to add Syria to the list of Middle Eastern countries with U.S.-approved ruling parties. As in the case of Iraq and Afghanistan, these dictators-in-waiting will walk a path to power paved with American money and likely covered in the blood of American soldiers.

    Rubio, described by many as a Tea Party favorite, chastised Senator Paul, refuting his allegation that a vote for arming the Syrian rebels was tantamount to giving guns to al-Qaeda.

    "I don't think any member of this committee would vote for anything we thought was going to arm al Qaeda," said Rubio.

    Mendendez piled on, saying, "Al Qaeda, unfortunately, is well-armed. That is the present reality in Syria."

    Senator Corker tried striking a less hostile tone, arguing that arming rebels vetted by Congress — as called for in his bill — would prevent U.S. weaponry from being funneled into more radical segments of the coalition of anti-Asad armed forces.

    Seing through Corker’s false dilemma, Paul responded, saying, “It’s impossible to know who our friends are.” He later said that the vote was nothing more than a “rush to war.”

    In an exclusive interview with The New American, Senator Paul pointed out the irony in the fact that the original Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) enacted after September 11, 2001 called for finding and destroying al-Qaeda, while the legislation passed on May 21 by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee would arm known associates of that very organization.

    “These people [Syrian rebels] will say they love America knowing that that’s how to get weapons. They lie to us and then shoot us in the back,” Paul explained.

    Another bit of irony apparently lost on 15 members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee is the fact that the United States has walked this road before. In the 1980s, Congress voted to arm militant Islamic forces under the pretext that the enemy of our enemy was our friend. Then, within 20 years, the very beneficiaries of U.S. military largesse in Afghanistan seized control of that country and reportedly sheltered and trained the men who carried out the attacks of September 11.

    One wonders how (or if) the Senate fails to appreciate the destruction that will surely come from once again sowing the wind and reaping the whirlwind that comes from arming those who would do us harm. Some senators, however, seemed determined to deploy troops in every corner of the planet, regardless of the fact these young men and women could be killed by militants armed with weapons supplied by their very own government.

    Never one to miss a chance to take his turn banging on the war drum, Senator John McCain mocked an amendment offered by Senator Tom Udall (D-N.M.) that would have placed more stringent controls on the type of weapon shipped to Syrian rebels.

    "The senator from New Mexico wants to use shotguns against SCUD missiles," McCain said.


    More:

    http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews...o-war-in-syria
    Last edited by Warlord; 05-26-2013 at 05:33 PM.
    Pledge to donate to Rep. Thomas Massie on 4/20: (http://FundPatriotsDay.com)

    Donate to Rep. Thomas Massie on 4/20 (http://ThomasMassie.com)

    Follow Me on twitter: @MassieBomb







  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.


Similar Threads

  1. Hard-hitting 5 minute Rand video on arming Al-Qaeda allies
    By SneakyFrenchSpy in forum Rand Paul Forum
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 11-25-2015, 07:34 PM
  2. Rand Paul: US has been arming ISIS in Syria
    By jct74 in forum Rand Paul Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-22-2014, 09:04 AM
  3. Bill Maher: We're basically arming al-Qaeda in Syria
    By COpatriot in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-15-2013, 09:57 PM
  4. Rand Paul: Senate Is Arming Al-Qaeda and Rushing to War in Syria
    By FrankRep in forum World News & Affairs
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-15-2013, 03:38 PM
  5. Rand & arming Al-Queda types in Syria
    By vita3 in forum Rand Paul Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-14-2013, 06:38 AM

Select a tag for more discussion on that topic

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •