Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: NPR: Is Online Gambling Legal If Bitcoins, Not Dollars, Are At Stake?

  1. #11

    Default

    We really shouldn't be name calling.


  2. Remove this section of ads by registering or logging in. Forget your password? Click here.


  3. #12

    Default

    INTRADE just banned the Americans due to the gov't regs.
    Bitcoins mayhap could let all Yanks bet on the Dublin site!!!

  4. #13

    Default

    Like bittorrent, gambling sites that accept bitcoin will exist somewhere in the world always and can't be stopped.

    Bitcoin is a one world currency...but instead of asshole Bilderberg's in control, the people are. It is an escape for anyone in the world wanting to get away from their central bank.

  5. #14
    Member Zippyjuan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Hosting FEMA Party
    Posts
    15,285

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hazek View Post
    Well perhaps if you'd get your head out of your ass you would. Bitcoins are monopoly money that some people are willing to cough up legal tender for, while chips are representations of legal tender. Only a monkey wouldn't see the difference.
    Both are representatives of legal tender.
    Freedom is a state of mind. Nobody can take that from you unless you let them.

  6. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Both are representatives of legal tender.
    Not if I say it isn't. Or you say it isn't. Or Hazek says it isn't. There is a large swath of the population that flatly reject bitcoins as tender. A poker chip belonging to a certain casino, on the other hand, isn't rejected.

    That's the point. They're not synonymous. Not anymore than my hair clippings are representative of legal tender should people use them to trade for dollars. It's asinine to even pretend bitcoins have any degree of parity with a poker chip.
    Last edited by BSWPaulsen; 02-08-2013 at 06:51 PM.

  7. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hazek View Post
    Well perhaps if you'd get your head out of your ass you would. Bitcoins are monopoly money that some people are willing to cough up legal tender for, while chips are representations of legal tender. Only a monkey wouldn't see the difference.
    Some monkeys might, actually.
    "We do have some differences and our approaches will be different, but that makes him his own person. I mean why should he [Rand] be a clone and do everything and think just exactly as I have. I think it's an opportunity to be independent minded. We are about 99% [the same on issues]." Ron Paul

  8. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BSWPaulsen View Post
    Not if I say it isn't. Or you say it isn't. Or Hazek says it isn't. There is a large swath of the population that flatly reject bitcoins as tender. A poker chip belonging to a certain casino, on the other hand, isn't rejected.

    That's the point. They're not synonymous. Not anymore than my hair clippings are representative of legal tender should people use them to trade for dollars. It's asinine to even pretend bitcoins have any degree of parity with a poker chip.
    There are more people interested in bitcoin globally than a poker chip that is only accepted at the casino it came from.

    Maybe I missed your point?

  9. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paladin69 View Post
    There are more people interested in bitcoin globally than a poker chip that is only accepted at the casino it came from.

    Maybe I missed your point?
    Interest != Representative of Legal Tender

  10. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BSWPaulsen View Post
    Interest != Representative of Legal Tender
    Ah, alright. Yeah that wasn't really an argument I cared about. I just care about what has value.

    If I cared about what government considered legal tender, well, then we wouldn't get involved with half the things we do that aren't USD. I just like this story because it defies the will of governments and there isn't much that can be done about it.

    If people want to continue arguing over petty stuff instead of trying to make some money for themselves, then I guess that is their business and I'll stay out of it.

  11. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by VoluntaryAmerican View Post
    Some monkeys might, actually.
    You're right, I can definitely see how my post may have insulted some monkeys.
    My personality type: INTJ - please forgive my weaknesses (Not naturally in tune with others feelings; may be insensitive at times, tend to respond to conflict with logic and reason, tend to believe I'm always right, tend to be unwilling or unable to accept blame )

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •