They would simply raise the budget, print more money, then tax everyone more....where have I heard that before?Originally Posted by GunnyFreedom
Then the government would be able to do a lot less, and I assume most of us would be cheering that.
They would simply raise the budget, print more money, then tax everyone more....where have I heard that before?Then the government would be able to do a lot less, and I assume most of us would be cheering that.
Currently has:
$5,521 Federal Reserve Notes in circulation stamped "NOT BACKED BY GOLD"
- SUPPORT FREE TRADE, SMUGGLE -
2 + 2 = 5.
If the end justifies the means, I surmise that you would support a draft for both men and women between the ages of 18-30 and send them off to fight in the hopes of ending war.
Currently has:
$5,521 Federal Reserve Notes in circulation stamped "NOT BACKED BY GOLD"
- SUPPORT FREE TRADE, SMUGGLE -
2 + 2 = 5.
Wait, you are saying because I want to restrict government, means I want to force kids to go to war?
Do you even read what you write? o.O
I dunno, who else is running around talking about chaining down government under more and more stringent control?
If you agree that the end justies the means then sure, send everyone off to war to end it a draft might wake people up. Who cares how to stop it, just stop it. In my view, government purchasing made in the USA perpetuates the very exisitance of the government.
If the end is to eliminate government, why would you hope that they purchase made in the USA products? It perpetuates the very exisitance of the government you wish to eliminate. Through nepotism and coporate selection on who/which companies get to provide for it.
Currently has:
$5,521 Federal Reserve Notes in circulation stamped "NOT BACKED BY GOLD"
- SUPPORT FREE TRADE, SMUGGLE -
2 + 2 = 5.
RP.
you?
Currently has:
$5,521 Federal Reserve Notes in circulation stamped "NOT BACKED BY GOLD"
- SUPPORT FREE TRADE, SMUGGLE -
2 + 2 = 5.
My record speaks for itself.
OK, let's break down this logic.
"I want government to be subject to arbitrary and intense restriction by the people at large"
"OH!!!111! So you want to enslave children and send them off to die in a war!!!111!!"
most people that use such logic I call liberals, democrats, republicans, or neoconservatives.
You do know that illogical appeals to emotion are not only fallacious, but are the very weapon the left and the right use to stifle liberty.
Do you really want to be allied with such monsters?
Last edited by GunnyFreedom; 02-03-2013 at 02:54 PM.
The more I read the thread the more I think this idea is a bad one.
"We do have some differences and our approaches will be different, but that makes him his own person. I mean why should he [Rand] be a clone and do everything and think just exactly as I have. I think it's an opportunity to be independent minded. We are about 99% [the same on issues]." Ron Paul
Makes sense to meI am in favor of something like this - but ONLY for government. Government should have to abide by rules the rest of us do not. I don't really think the US Gov 'buying American' will make any kind of real difference, it's more about any excuse to chain government down and put them under the control of the people. Also, if there were going to be any sort of protectionist economic stimuli stuff, this has to be one of the more harmless ones.
The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you're inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
