Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 45

Thread: Sen. Rand Paul to Promote "Founders' Vision of Foreign Policy" (The New American)

  1. #1

    Default Sen. Rand Paul to Promote "Founders' Vision of Foreign Policy" (The New American)



    Sen. Rand Paul to Promote "Founders' Vision of Foreign Policy"
    Written by Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.

    On February 6, Senator Paul will deliver a message to the Heritage Foundation entitled “Restoring the Founders’ Vision of Foreign Policy.”

    In an outline of the speech provided to The New American in advance of the meeting, Paul says he plans to describe “his vision of a foreign policy that respects the plain language of our Constitution, the legal powers of Congress and the important role of a strong presidency.” He will also emphasize the importance of “maintaining the strongest national defense among nations while also questioning what constitutes actual ‘defense.’”
    more here..... http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews...foreign-policy
    Gold is for kings, silver is for gentlemen, copper is for the poor and paper money is for slaves.



  • #2

    Default

    Looks like an end to the war machine...good stuff.

  • #3

    Default

    That sounds good. Maybe he's heard some of the criticism from some of his previous foreign policy comments.
    Quote Originally Posted by RonPaulMall View Post
    Endorsing is like telling the girl you picked up at the bar that she's gorgeous. A meaningless gesture benefiting only the person making it.

  • #4

    Default

    How does this mesh with the "the us should retaliate if anyone attacks Israel."?

  • #5
    Mr. Republitarian FSP-Rebel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    A^2
    Posts
    8,402
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by talkingpointes View Post
    How does this mesh with the "the us should retaliate if anyone attacks Israel."?
    The just of what he was saying that some won't accept is that an attack on Israel would be seen as an attack on the US.

  • #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Traditional Conservative View Post
    That sounds good. Maybe he's heard some of the criticism from some of his previous foreign policy comments.
    I think it is more likely that some of the criticizers jumped the gun. But, time will tell.
    "We do have some differences and our approaches will be different, but that makes him his own person. I mean why should he [Rand] be a clone and do everything and think just exactly as I have. I think it's an opportunity to be independent minded. We are about 99% the same on issues." "People Try To Drive Wedges Between Rand And Me." --Ron Paul

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=pB5JgzBVHN0


  • #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FSP-Rebel View Post
    The just of what he was saying that some won't accept is that an attack on Israel would be seen as an attack on the US.
    “Well, absolutely we stand with Israel,” he said, “but what I think we should do is announce to the world – and I think it is pretty well known — that any attack on Israel will be treated as an attack on the United States.”

    He thinks it should be announced to the world.
    In America today there remains two factions.
    The Federalist and the Anti-Federalist.
    Neither of the two dominating political parties belong to the latter.
    You can't be one and the other..

  • #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phill4paul View Post
    “Well, absolutely we stand with Israel,” he said, “but what I think we should do is announce to the world – and I think it is pretty well known — that any attack on Israel will be treated as an attack on the United States.”

    He thinks it should be announced to the world.
    Yeah I am tired of the rand paul spin docters trying to make us look like the bad guy from that statement. Rand clearly states that in HIS OPINION and attack on israel is an attack on us. That is NOT the founder FP AT ALL

  • #9

    Default

    I am sure that if Rand would have told the Israeli/and Arabs that they need to work it out themselves RP would have said Rand encouraged the inevitable war.
    War; everything in the world wrong, evil and immoral combined into one and multiplied by millions.

  • #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phill4paul View Post
    He thinks it should be announced to the world.
    He thinks it should be announced to the world because it would be a deterrent against any country invading Israel. He thinks that it would be less likely that Israel would get attacked by another country if that country realizes that they would have to go up against the strongest military in the world. So he basically thinks that by saying that it will serve as a deterrent and keep the Middle East more stable.
    Quote Originally Posted by RonPaulMall View Post
    Endorsing is like telling the girl you picked up at the bar that she's gorgeous. A meaningless gesture benefiting only the person making it.

  • Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •