Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Are these "constitutional" sheriffs who are taking a stand

  1. #1

    Default Are these "constitutional" sheriffs who are taking a stand

    Are these "constitutional" sheriffs who are taking a stand against Obama's and Feinstein's latest gun control proposals also taking a stand against gun owners needing a "permit" to carry concealed in their county? If not, why not?
    "Sorry, fellows, the rebellion is off. We couldn't get a rebellion permit."



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tod View Post
    Are these "constitutional" sheriffs who are taking a stand against Obama's and Feinstein's latest gun control proposals also taking a stand against gun owners needing a "permit" to carry concealed in their county? If not, why not?
    good question.
    rewritten history with armies of their crooks - invented memories, did burn all the books... Mark Noffler

  4. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by torchbearer View Post
    good question.
    I sent it to CSPOA and Oathkeepers....
    Last edited by Tod; 01-18-2013 at 05:51 PM.
    "Sorry, fellows, the rebellion is off. We couldn't get a rebellion permit."

  5. #4

    Default

    One step at a time.There are many thousands of unconstitutional laws on the books,State and Federal.For instance,I think all drug laws are unconstitutional,the18th amendment outlawed booze,what amendment outlawed pot or heroin?

    I will accept and relish any sheriff who states that he will not enforce further attacks on the 2nd amendment just as I would a sheriff who states that he will no longer enforce pot laws or any one or two or thousands that I consider unconstitutional.

  6. #5
    Supporting Member
    Purgatory
    osan's Avatar



    Blog Entries
    81
    Posts
    10,835
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    I stand with Rand!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tod View Post
    Are these "constitutional" sheriffs who are taking a stand against Obama's and Feinstein's latest gun control proposals also taking a stand against gun owners needing a "permit" to carry concealed in their county? If not, why not?
    I call that a good question, but suggest we address the more pressing matters first.

    I suspect some may be in liberty but not "too much" of it... to turn a phrase.
    --
    "When it comes to rule making, our first duty is to make rules for our own conduct. If we don't, then we run afoul of violating other people's rights to freedom. Freedom is not an outcomes-based approach to solving social problems. It is a start and it is a moral premise. It says that no one has the right to trespass on another person, but outside of that you are free to pursue whatever makes you happy." -John Houlgate

  7. #6

    Default

    An ounce of pot is a felony in many(thousands?)counties in America.Would you denigrate or refuse to support a sheriff in one of these counties if he refused to enforce any and all pot laws in his jurisdiction but did not do the same for heroin?
    If not,why not?

  8. #7

    Default

    FWIW, I never did hear back from OK or CSPOA....
    "Sorry, fellows, the rebellion is off. We couldn't get a rebellion permit."

  9. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tod View Post
    FWIW, I never did hear back from OK or CSPOA....
    Color me perplexed...






« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •