Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 71

Thread: Housing Starts Rise 37% YoY Crushing Expectations

  1. #41
    Member Zippyjuan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Hosting FEMA Party
    Posts
    15,004

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by newbitech View Post
    Out of curiosity, have you looked at housing starts compared to say, 5 years ago? How about say 10 years ago? 15? 40?

    2012 starts - 780k down (-43%) from 5 years ago, down (-54%) from 10 years ago, down (-47%) from 15 years ago, and DOWN (-67%) from its 40 year generational peak in 1970 friggin 2!

    2007 starts - 1,355k

    2002 starts - 1,705k

    1997 starts - 1,474k

    1972 starts - 2,357k


    and of course the numbers you are citing are SEASONALLY ADJUSTED. AND why not peal back that MSM sponsored headline number?

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-0...recovery-story

    wake me up when we reach the BOTTOM of the previous housing market down trends, then I might get excited about the possibility of a housing recovery. Till then, its no point to speak of housing being in ANYTHING BUT bull market territory.
    Your chart shows that the bottom was reached and things have indeed turned back upwards. Sure things aren't back up to bubble levels, but they have been improving from their worst levels.
    Freedom is a state of mind. Nobody can take that from you unless you let them.



  • #42
    Member newbitech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    7,614
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Your chart shows that the bottom was reached and things have indeed turned back upwards. Sure things aren't back up to bubble levels, but they have been improving from their worst levels.
    I see 5 bottoms on that chart. 4 of which occurred previous to this latest bottom. ALL of which were not the TRUE bottom. In fact, if you notice that pattern in this chart, housing has been in a secular bear for the last 40 years. The pattern was broken in during the .com bubble and carried on with the housing bubble.

    Is this the true bottom?

    Things are no where even close to previous recession levels, from 1991, 1982, 1975, 1970. I'll just leave it at that.

    Yes, the trend has changed. Unfortunately trend changes in charts don't make a REAL estate recovery. This is STILL the WORSE 5 years of housing activity since most BUYERS and SELLERS have been alive. And it will be the worse 10 years, and likely the worse 20 years.

    Of course its a GREAT market for those people who are only looking at last year, but sadly, that isn't how the housing game is played.

  • #43
    Member Zippyjuan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Hosting FEMA Party
    Posts
    15,004

    Default

    What would you consider a "true" bottom? It's lowest point in history ever? The best time to buy something is when everybody isn't buying. If you wait until eveyone is in, the prices are probably nearing peak again.

    The line for "average number of homes sold" has been rising in general for those past 40 years. Not everybody needs a new house (there is also more limited space to build more new houses over time).

    And every line on the chart is now trending upwards. That signifies a bottom passsing.

    From the article you linked:
    housing has improved somewhat from the post-crisis lows
    Last edited by Zippyjuan; 01-26-2013 at 07:09 PM.
    Freedom is a state of mind. Nobody can take that from you unless you let them.

  • #44
    Member KrokHead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Whatever my IP address says
    Posts
    646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by torchbearer View Post
    my rent is $450 and i don't live in a dump.
    hard to beat that without living in a ghetto.
    In NY it often costs over 1100 for 1 BR to even live in the ghetto because the rents are artificially inflated by section 8. The government really hates social mobility.

  • #45
    Member newbitech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    7,614
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    What would you consider a "true" bottom? It's lowest point in history ever? The best time to buy something is when everybody isn't buying. If you wait until eveyone is in, the prices are probably nearing peak again.

    The line for "average number of homes sold" has been rising in general for those past 40 years. Not everybody needs a new house (there is also more limited space to build more new houses over time).

    And every line on the chart is now trending upwards. That signifies a bottom passsing.

    From the article you linked:
    True bottom of the secular bear is when we start posting higher highs and higher lows in the primary and secondary trends. The trend before 1993-2008 was lower highs and lower lows, thus secular bear. Despite the best efforts to prop up housing from 1993-2008, market forces reverted to the longer term trend.

    Yes, this way a low point in the longer term bear market in housing, we are seeing the beginning of a cyclical bull, but we are 5 years past the pivot and barely coming off the temporary bottom. The housing cycle trends which the chart clear shows, are 10 year cycles from trough to trough (or peak to peak). As you can see, the current trough's peak was in 2005. There is your 8 years. If we have an extended cycle, at best we'll get another 2 years to the next peak around middle of 2015 some time.

    So unless you are betting on another fed run like from 1992-2005, what you are facing here is not the beginning of a new 5-8 year primary bull run (still embedded within a secular bear). No, what you are facing is a bull trap that in my view will see a quick run up to trend lows (or probably just shy), and then yet another reversion back to mean secular bear trend. So this bull is more likely a calf, that will have one good year (this year) and turn back around to the primary bear which is due historically in another year and a half.

    See the 2002 recession that never happened? Yeah, now you are gonna see the inverse of that starting in the middle of 2014 and running down past these lows and MAYBE hitting the secular bear bottom some time in 2018-2020. That is pending the resolution of the debt overhang of the currency, and unfunded liabilities, + whatever crap gets added on between now and then.

    Bottom line. Housing took way to long to start a recovery, and the cycle went right through any upturn that would print a recovery. Yes, there needs to be a recovery before a bull. We haven't recovered from these lows. We haven't recovered from the lows housing cycle of the last 40 years. Yes, the arrow is signalling up, but that just probably means look out above you cause shits still falling off the ceiling.

  • #46
    Member newbitech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    7,614
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    also, since you mentioned actual homes sold. That line looks flat to me. One thing you will notice is the compression between the index (or starts) and homes sold. Historically that compression ratio is about 50% of starts -> sold. So in this potential recovery, we can expect to see starts run away from sales. So just on data alone, looking at starts is not the best way to gauge a recovery due to the compression factor. Each of the last 3 true recoveries saw quick correction once that compression ration began exceeding 50%. That is, when too many houses were built the market naturally corrected.

    I suspect that will happen this time as well and in a very pronounced way. That is, the exuberance in new home starts will quickly fade as the actual sales lag. This I believe has the very remarkable effect of, the more crap they build, the less likely it is to be sold.

  • #47

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by newbitech View Post
    True bottom of the secular bear is when we start posting higher highs and higher lows in the primary and secondary trends. The trend before 1993-2008 was lower highs and lower lows, thus secular bear. Despite the best efforts to prop up housing from 1993-2008, market forces reverted to the longer term trend.

    Yes, this way a low point in the longer term bear market in housing, we are seeing the beginning of a cyclical bull, but we are 5 years past the pivot and barely coming off the temporary bottom. The housing cycle trends which the chart clear shows, are 10 year cycles from trough to trough (or peak to peak). As you can see, the current trough's peak was in 2005. There is your 8 years. If we have an extended cycle, at best we'll get another 2 years to the next peak around middle of 2015 some time.

    So unless you are betting on another fed run like from 1992-2005, what you are facing here is not the beginning of a new 5-8 year primary bull run (still embedded within a secular bear). No, what you are facing is a bull trap that in my view will see a quick run up to trend lows (or probably just shy), and then yet another reversion back to mean secular bear trend. So this bull is more likely a calf, that will have one good year (this year) and turn back around to the primary bear which is due historically in another year and a half.

    See the 2002 recession that never happened? Yeah, now you are gonna see the inverse of that starting in the middle of 2014 and running down past these lows and MAYBE hitting the secular bear bottom some time in 2018-2020. That is pending the resolution of the debt overhang of the currency, and unfunded liabilities, + whatever crap gets added on between now and then.

    Bottom line. Housing took way to long to start a recovery, and the cycle went right through any upturn that would print a recovery. Yes, there needs to be a recovery before a bull. We haven't recovered from these lows. We haven't recovered from the lows housing cycle of the last 40 years. Yes, the arrow is signalling up, but that just probably means look out above you cause shits still falling off the ceiling.
    Would your advice to someone in the market for a new house around 1970 be... hold off for 50 or so years so that you can buy at the market bottom?

  • #48

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by enoch150 View Post
    Would your advice to someone in the market for a new house around 1970 be... hold off for 50 or so years so that you can buy at the market bottom?
    With a 15 trillion budget deficit, boomers retiring, yes.

    Please, stop the out of context nonsense.
    Sign up, Log in:
    http://forums.officer.com/
    Surviving
    http://www.themodernsurvivalist.com/

    • Fiat Banking - Your supply of capital is limited to whatever arbitrary limit those who have limitless currency resources allow.
    • There is no 'law' - Only psychopaths who pervert just principals for their own enrichment while violently stealing your wealth, your future, and your life if need be.

  • #49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LibForestPaul View Post
    With a 15 trillion budget deficit, boomers retiring, yes.

    Please, stop the out of context nonsense.
    Out of context? Like using a chart of housing starts as evidence of a nonexistent 40+ year bear market in housing prices?




  • #50
    Member newbitech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    7,614
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by enoch150 View Post
    Would your advice to someone in the market for a new house around 1970 be... hold off for 50 or so years so that you can buy at the market bottom?
    I am not giving that advice at all. Simply point out that anyone calling for a bottom is dead ass wrong. They would have been dead ass wrong in 1970 too. You need to keep in mind that I am not the one encouraging people to buy cause the market is at "the bottom".

    If you really want advice, I'd have a whole hell of a lot more questions to answer with you rather than just, is the market at the bottom. Consider all the people that bought houses no where near the bottom. It's pretty clear that buying at the bottom is NOT the main factor in determining how people decide to get in.

    That being said, I'd assumed this thread was for people looking to play in the market, not have a place to live. I am also assuming that people reading this thread aren't homeless AND qualified to purchase. So my advice at this point is to do what the vast majority of people are doing, and that is stay put.

    There is no reason to rush out and buy a house right now because of a blip in a chart.

  • Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •