Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: Alex Jones vs Cenk Uygur

  1. #31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sluggo View Post
    LOL. Love seeing him get owned like that.
    9/11 Thermate experiments

    Eze 22:25 There's a conspiracy of prophets within her....

    "I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

    "We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
    The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.


  2. Remove this section of ads by registering or logging in. Forget your password? Click here.


  3. #32

    Default

    Cenk is 100 million miles off mark when he equates Peter Schiff with the likes of the NY Fed and Goldman Sachs. He just doesn't get it.

  4. #33

    Default Cenk is an idiot

    I'm sorry, but Cenk is just stupid. Alex is talking about a set of facts, of documents, of documented plans etc. Cenk disagrees on the basis of "it seems crazy". Come on, how dumb someone has to be to don't understand that personal impressions like this mean nothing.

    For instance, suppose Cenk and Alex lived in the 1930s, when Hitler was saying he was going to kill the jews. Alex would come with a speech of Hitler saying he was going to kill the jews and would be terrified. Cenk would answer like this: "Oh, this is just crazy. I mean, WHY would someone want to kill anybody? And WHY would someone like killing jews. That just doesn't make sense to me."

    If Cenk lived before the XXth century, he'd still be stupid, but it was going to be comprehensible. But having lived in the century in which we had two world wars, communism, and nazism, resulting in more than 200 MILLION deaths by governments around the world, one can only conclude that he's beyond retarded...

  5. #34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Emerick View Post
    I'm sorry, but Cenk is just stupid. Alex is talking about a set of facts, of documents, of documented plans etc. Cenk disagrees on the basis of "it seems crazy". Come on, how dumb someone has to be to don't understand that personal impressions like this mean nothing.

    For instance, suppose Cenk and Alex lived in the 1930s, when Hitler was saying he was going to kill the jews. Alex would come with a speech of Hitler saying he was going to kill the jews and would be terrified. Cenk would answer like this: "Oh, this is just crazy. I mean, WHY would someone want to kill anybody? And WHY would someone like killing jews. That just doesn't make sense to me."

    If Cenk lived before the XXth century, he'd still be stupid, but it was going to be comprehensible. But having lived in the century in which we had two world wars, communism, and nazism, resulting in more than 200 MILLION deaths by governments around the world, one can only conclude that he's beyond retarded...
    If Cenk had a tv program on German TV in the early 1930's he would be suggesting the Nazi party putting yellow stickers on Jewish businesses was nothing serious... 10 years later they were sent to gas chambers.

  6. #35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by libertariantexas View Post
    By "rational libertarian" I mean someone like myself or Ron Paul. Someone who doesn't trust the government to do the right thing or a competent job, and sees too much government as dangerous, as well as a major detriment to the economy.

    The "irrational" "libertarians" are those like AJ who seem to be one bad hair day away from climbing a tower. Those paranoiacs who think the government is "out to get them" 24-7. Who believe everything is a massive government conspiracy (part of the reason they are irrational is that the same people who don't think the government is competent enough to deliver the mail think that same government is competent enough to flawlessly execute massive and elaborate conspiracies- that just ain't rational, folks- how can the government be completely inept on one hand, and execute flawlessly on the other?).

    Frankly, I'm not sure AJ is irrational. I sometimes think he really doesn't believe half the stuff he says and may well be just demagogue the issues for financial gain. But whether he is a true believer or just an opportunist, he reflects badly on those of us who are rational libertarians.



    Are you serious? Do you really think the ability to earn money as an entertainer demonstrates rationality? I'll give you a chance to think about that, and if you really believe it, I'll give you a list of really bat shit crazy people who are multi millionaires and you can try again.



    Am I missing something here? Last I checked, AJ had a radio show. How are you "viewing" that?




    Because they never have nutty people on "The View" or Fox News? Right...

    Glenn Beck (not one of my favorite people, despite the fact that he also claims to be a libertarian) was right. The reason AJ is often brought on these shows is to discredit libertarians. Put AJ on "Piers Morgan" or "The View," get him riled up (which usually takes about 15-seconds), red in the face, yelling and ranting, and they win. Because he is being presented as a representative libertarian, but comes off as a blow hard, a bully, and a nut, not a person capable of rational debate.

    The sad thing is, he DOES make some good points that I, or any other libertarian, would agree with- whether discussing gun control or anything else. But the good parts of his message are obscured by his abrasive personality and his nutty conspiracy rantings.

    Sit back and think about it. Take the infamous "Piers Morgan" appearance. What do you think sticks out most in the mind of the average viewer watching that act:

    A) That AJ points correctly points out that the right to bear arms is about protecting ourselves from aggressors or the state.
    B) That AJ went off on a bunch of crazy conspiracy rants.
    C) That AJ got riled up, started yelling and ranting, challenged Morgan to a fight, etc.

    My guess is that no more than 20% focused on A) (and most of those were probably already libertarians). The other 80% probably saw him as a loud mouthed bully and a nut (or both). I doubt that "performance" by AJ convinced a single person who wasn't already a 2nd amendment supporter to become a supporter.

    The exact opposite of Ron Paul. Ron, despite being extremely charismatically challenged, was able to convince millions to become libertarians. He didn't do it by throwing out crazy and volatile statements, he didn't do it by yelling and ranting and bullying. He was calm, rational, and reasonable- he got people carefully consider what he was saying, and many realized that what he said made sense.
    Different strokes for different folks I guess. Some people wake up when they get the in your face message that AJ brings to the table, and some people wake up when someone like Ron Paul does a great job at planting a seed that gets them thinking. Both strategies do win over converts, it all depends on the person.

    That being said, I'm not at all a fan of the AJ strategy of being a blow-hard, and I couldn't watch the Cenk interview because it was embarrassing to me to sit there and watch him go apeshit.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •