Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Conspicuous Absence of Conclusive Evidence on Effectiveness of FLU VACCINES

  1. #1

    Default Conspicuous Absence of Conclusive Evidence on Effectiveness of FLU VACCINES

    Saturday, January 12, 2013

    The Shocking Lack of Evidence Supporting Flu Vaccines



    Sayer Ji, Contributor
    Activist Post

    With the flu season ramping up, many are looking to vaccination as a "preventive" approach. Those who abstain are often accused of being uneducated, or worse, socially irresponsible. Nothing could be further from the truth.

    As it presently stands, it is not sound medical science, but primarily economic and political motivation which generates the immense pressure behind mass participation in the annual ritual of flu vaccination.

    It is a heavily guarded secret within the medical establishment (especially within the corridors of the CDC) that the Cochrane Database Review, considered by many within the evidence-based medical model to be the gold standard for assessing the effectiveness of common medical interventions, does not lend unequivocal scientific support to the belief and/or propaganda that flu vaccines are safe and effective.

    To the contrary, these authoritative reviews reveal there is a conspicuous absence of conclusive evidence as to the effectiveness of influenza vaccines in children under 2, healthy adults, the elderly, and healthcare workers who care for the elderly.

    What is even more disconcerting is that only one safety study on inactivated flu vaccines has been performed in children under 2 (the population most susceptible to adverse reactions), even though in the USA and Canada current guidelines recommend the vaccination of healthy children from six months old.

    Another alarming finding following the global pandemic declared by the World Health Organization in 2009, is that receipt of the seasonal flu vaccine among Canadians actually increased the rate of medically attended pandemic H1N1 infection. Vaccines, therefore, may actually decrease resistance to viral infection via their immunosuppressive actions. View study.


    Can Vaccination Replace Natural Immunity?

    At the outset it should be acknowledged that there could be no medical justification for vaccination in the first place if it were not for the observation that periodic infection from wild type pathogens confers lasting, natural immunity. In a very real sense periodic infectious challenges are Nature's immunizations, without which the very concept of vaccination would make absolutely no sense.
    The vaccination process artificially simulates and co-opts a natural process, generating a broad range of adverse unintended consequences, many of which have been documented here. Vaccine proponents would have us believe that natural immunity is inferior to synthetic immunity, and should be replaced by the latter. In some cases they even suggest breastfeeding should be delayed during immunizations because it "interferes" with the vaccine efficacy. Sounds like naked economic incentives have trumped genuine, serious health concerns for the entire population, especially the very young, the elderly and the sick.

    This warped perspective follows from the disingenuous standard vaccine researchers use to "prove" the "efficacy" of their vaccines. The chemical kitchen sink is thrown at the immune system in order to conserve the expensive-to-produce antigen and to generate a more intense immune response - a process, not unlike what happens when you kick a beehive. These chemicals include detergents, anti-freeze, heavy metals, xenotrophic retroviruses, DNA from aborted human fetuses (diploid cells) and other species, etc.
    ..
    It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen
    to set brush fires in peoples minds! Revolution is Action upon Revelation!

    The small green parakeet, Tito, was flung helplessly from the cage, landing on the floor. When a girl screamed, the officer sneerd:
    "F*** THE BIRD !!!"
    ...and stomped on it with his jackboot. READ MORE: http://www.policestateusa.com/2013/n...lugo-parakeet/




  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Member Zippyjuan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Out Of This World
    Posts
    21,129

    Default

    I am certainly not somebody afraid of vaccines, but I don't intend to get a flu vaccine (haven't ever). Not becaue of fear but becasue they are of questionable value for most people. First of all, the vaccine has to be prepared months ahead of time to get enough doses. That means that it is based on whatever was the most common variation of the flu which was common last year. If you were exposed to the flu (even if you didn't get sick) your body probably already adapted its immune system against the old virus and won't be hurt by it this year. Second, it will be a new- as yet not identified strain- which will be the dominant one this season That one will NOT be included in this year's vaccine.
    I am Zippy and I approve of this message. But you don't have to.

  4. #3

    Default

    I think its just an ill concieved social experiment. The statistic released this year that those who took the flu shot are 62% less likely to get the flu than people who didn't take the shot is not settling to me. What if BECAUSE of of all these flu shots, more people, in more widespread an area, are gettting the flu than otherwise would have. If this were the case, the often self righteous "vaccinated/protected" group could actually be making things worse for all of us by selfishly improving their personal odds.

    Say for example that if nobody in the US got the shot 1,000,000 people would get the flu.

    Then if there was someway to replay the same scenario in vivo, in the same population and half the people got flu shots. In this scenario, maybe there are now 1.5 million cases but it LOOKS LIKE the flu vaccine is working because the vaccinated group (that is effectively infecting everyone else) only represents 1/3 of those who manifest the virus.
    It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen
    to set brush fires in peoples minds! Revolution is Action upon Revelation!

    The small green parakeet, Tito, was flung helplessly from the cage, landing on the floor. When a girl screamed, the officer sneerd:
    "F*** THE BIRD !!!"
    ...and stomped on it with his jackboot. READ MORE: http://www.policestateusa.com/2013/n...lugo-parakeet/







« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •