Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Supreme Court seems unlikely to let police order blood tests for drunk-driving suspects

  1. #1

    Supreme Court seems unlikely to let police order blood tests for drunk-driving suspects

    By Robert Barnes, Published: January 9

    The Supreme Court on Wednesday seemed unlikely to allow police to routinely force suspected drunk drivers to give a blood sample without the officers at least trying to obtain a warrant from a judge.

    Justices across the ideological spectrum seemed to recoil during oral arguments from what Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. described as the “pretty scary image of somebody restrained, and, you know, a representative of the state approaching them with a needle.”

    There seemed to be little, if any, support for the proposition that the usual constitutional protections that require a warrant for searches do not apply in drunk-driving arrests. Missouri, backed by the Obama administration, argued that a suspect’s dissipating blood-alcohol content meant that, in effect, evidence was being lost and thus drawing blood should not require consent or a judge’s order.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...eb9_story.html



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2

  4. #3
    I'll believe it when I see it. SCOTUS ruled that DUI roadblocks were constitutionally illegal, but that since the public safety was in play, they were going to allow it.

  5. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by angelatc View Post
    I'll believe it when I see it. SCOTUS ruled that DUI roadblocks were constitutionally illegal, but that since the public safety was in play, they were going to allow it.
    True

  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by angelatc View Post
    I'll believe it when I see it. SCOTUS ruled that DUI roadblocks were constitutionally illegal, but that since the public safety was in play, they were going to allow it.
    This. You refuse a breathalyzer and they will take your blood. You blow into a breathalyzer and are above the legal limit and they will take your blood. Fifth Amendment be damned. I've gone through it before. I refused a breathalyzer and a urinalysis and was charged with two DUIs under per se DUI laws. These were automatic license suspensions and the equivalent of an admission of guilt. I eventually decided, you know what, 'f' it, I'll take your stupid test. (I'd refused because when I was younger (14 or so) the police stopped me and a friend in broad daylight and said we were drunk. Though we really hadn't drank anything. After administering a breathalyzer on the side of the road (I could see the results when my friend took it- .00) the cop continued to harrass us saying he was drunk and the test proved it) After taking their often times uncalibrated and sometimes fraudulant test I registered a .01. The legal limit was .08. Wouldn't ya know that that didn't help my case one damn bit since I already had refused the breathalyzer and that was seen as an admission of guilt. Oh, and they robbed me of a couple hundred dollars.
    “The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.” --George Orwell

    Quote Originally Posted by AuH20 View Post
    In terms of a full spectrum candidate, Rand is leaps and bounds above Trump. I'm not disputing that.
    Who else in public life has called for a pre-emptive strike on North Korea?--Donald Trump

  7. #6
    Uhh.... in TN they do this, except that they have a judge on call to get a warrant
    __________________________________________________ ________________
    "A politician will do almost anything to keep their job, even become a patriot" - Hearst

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Collins View Post
    Uhh.... in TN they do this, except that they have a judge on call to get a warrant
    And ink on standby? Seriously, a 'rubber stamp' makes no damn difference.
    “The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.” --George Orwell

    Quote Originally Posted by AuH20 View Post
    In terms of a full spectrum candidate, Rand is leaps and bounds above Trump. I'm not disputing that.
    Who else in public life has called for a pre-emptive strike on North Korea?--Donald Trump

  9. #8
    Don't you care about the children?

    Think of the kids man, if even one childs life is saved then it's okay for cops to not only stick their fingers in any hole in your body now we need to accept roadside body fluid collection...

    Coming soon CSF draws as well as vitreous-humor.........Just in case..



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 19
    Last Post: 12-21-2015, 11:30 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-17-2013, 11:24 AM
  3. Supreme Court To Rule: Can Police Take Your Blood Without Permission
    By presence in forum Individual Rights Violations: Case Studies
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-08-2013, 10:31 PM
  4. Supreme Court to decide if police can collect DNA from suspects
    By tsai3904 in forum Individual Rights Violations: Case Studies
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-09-2012, 04:45 PM
  5. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 01-26-2012, 09:09 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •