Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
What do you want me to do, to do for you to see you through?
A box of rain will ease the pain, and love will see you through.
Box of Rain, Grateful Dead
निर्विकल्पाOriginally Posted by PaulConventionWV
aka Wicked Heathen
I was a nasty woman before Trump made it cool.
This is the same specious argument that is made to justify EVERY SINGLE BIT of socialist legislation in this country. It is based on the false assumption that people are too stupid or predatory to be allowed to manage their own affairs and need the magicaly unstupid unpredatory hand of government to manage their lives for them.
It does not stand up to reason and it has been a failure in practice.
The proper concern of society is the preservation of individual freedom; the proper concern of the individual is the harmony of society.
"Who would be free, themselves must strike the blow." - Byron
"Who overcomes by force, hath overcome but half his foe." - Milton
Employers can demand whatever the hell they want. They do NOT have to hire you or give you whatever employment offer you want. They do not have to offer you whatever salary you want. They do not have to give you whatever location you want, or whatever position you want. They can offer you whatever they hell they want, and if you agree to it, you sign the contract and you get hired.
The argument saying employers should not be able to offer low privacy benefits is no different than offering low economic benefits (such as salary). This is the exact same argument.
I never said anyone had to be....stop putting words into my mouth. I said people who believe what you just said are not libertarians. If you already admit you aren't, then there's no foul. But just like 95% of Republicans shouldn't be calling themselves small-government conservatives, people who are trying to make it illegal for an employer to hire an employee who is willing to show the employer their facebook profile, are nothing but big-government liberals on this issue. Case closed.Everyone isn't required to be a libertarian or think exactly like you.
The Heart of Conservatism is Libertarianism - Ronald Reagan
It would appear so.
So I think there is nothing really to bother with anymore.
You have the "left" stripping rights through "democracy" and the "right" stripping rights through "corporatocracy".
So, I guess the only choice a free person has left is which orifice to take your raping in...
The proper concern of society is the preservation of individual freedom; the proper concern of the individual is the harmony of society.
"Who would be free, themselves must strike the blow." - Byron
"Who overcomes by force, hath overcome but half his foe." - Milton
This is about the federal government, not states, but is relevant to the topic:
U.S. employees set to be forced to give bosses their Facebook PASSWORDS
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz2RLxmBK4F
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
I haven't checked to see who voted what on this provision but it would interesting to see how guys like Amash votedAn attempt to ban US bosses from asking employees to hand over their Facebook login details has been blocked by Congress.
A last minute alteration to the controversial Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) that would have prevented employers demanding that prospective employees disclose social media passwords as a condition of employment was voted down in the house of representatives.
The proposal, put forward by Democrat Ed Perlmutter was defeated by a 224-189 majority, according to the Huffington Post.
Handing over passwords could legally be a condition of acquiring or keeping a job, said WebProNews
Connect With Us