Buchanan was more Jacksonian until the end of the Cold War.Originally Posted by Confederate
Buchanan was more Jacksonian until the end of the Cold War.
My 2013/2014 Liberty Picks:
- Mark Sanford [WIN]
- Greg Brannon
- Paul Broun
- Mia Love
- Lee Bright/Nancy Mace
- Joe Miller/Sarah Palin
True, but he's been the most outspoken conservative commentator against middle eastern intervention along with Ron Paul. Pat Buchanan is awesome, better than Ron Paul, IMO.
If you like protectionism and nanny state government, sure.
Self-determinationists vs America Determinationists?
Stop the Looting and Start Prosecuting! Gold plated Tungsten IS Money!
We Must Dissent A colher não existe.
A government is just a body of people, notably, usually, ungoverned.
"You mean this entire war started because The Empire dressed as the enemy? That's exactly what happened in the last major war! Our government is so stupid!"
Buchanan is a fraud who supported Romney.
Also this Jeffersonian/Jacksonian/whatever bullshit isn't going to get us anywhere. Either you support American bloodshed for Israel and other economic interests or you don't. Either you support continuous destabilization in the Middle East or you don't. Either you support our lives and money being wasted while not making anyone safer, or you don't. It is up to us to get people to our side on these issues, and if you really think that labeling current politicians after 1800's Presidents is going to accomplish something, then go for it. But most people would think "what would Jackson do about a nuclear Iran? How the hell do I know?", and then you're back to square zero.
PS: I personally take offense to be labelled an "idealist" when I'm just supporting common sense. Ron Paul's foreign policy is firmly rooted in reality, and if we're going to supply charts that imply that it isn't, that is strongly counter-intuitive.
Last edited by Anti-Neocon; 01-02-2013 at 11:22 PM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote