View Poll Results: Are we being sprayed?

Voters
43. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    22 51.16%
  • No, usuallly not.

    13 30.23%
  • Is there a third option?

    8 18.60%
Results 1 to 30 of 96

Thread: (Not?) Absolute proof of Chemtrails

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by rhelwig View Post
    How is that a terrible argument? If you do even a little basic math its pretty damn obvious that the chemtrails conspiracy theory is totally bogus. There's no way planes can be carrying enough stuff to do much of anything at those altitudes. Do the math! Do it yourself, and stop believing photoshop without at least thinking about it.
    Uh, that is a a terrible argument. Let me see if I get this straight.. you are saying that chemtrails aren't real because they can't possibly carry enough chemicals? I laugh at the 'do some math' quip too. Implying that because I have not 'done some math' I am ignorant or moronic. Please give me the variables and I will gladly 'do some math.' For starters, it would to help to know what they are spraying... you know, dissipation rates, concentration, etc. Your 'math' is obviously flawed in that you couldn't begin to tell me that. Saying that chemicals released at those altitudes would be ineffective is another flaw in your logic. That would really depend on what they were trying to do would it not? Directly poisoning people would surely not be as effective at 35,000 ft compared to a fly-over at 500 ft. The covered area at 35,000 ft would be so large the chemicals would largely be uneffective. (not make you die quickly) That is not to say that cancer rates would not be affected in the long run i.e. subtle depopulation. I'm not even saying this is the case. What about geoengineering? Are you aware of Operation Popeye? We have done extensive research into controlling weather patterns; whether that was to be used as weaponry or for humanaterian motives i.e. hurricane displacement etc. You are uninformed of what you are speaking on. The ridiculous assumption that planes couldn't carry enough chemicals when you don't know (and I don't know!) what they are or what the purposes of said chemicals is supposed to be as the sole basis of your arguement is troubling.
    Last edited by kcchiefs6465; 01-17-2013 at 08:12 PM.
    “The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.” --George Orwell

    Quote Originally Posted by AuH20 View Post
    In terms of a full spectrum candidate, Rand is leaps and bounds above Trump. I'm not disputing that.
    Who else in public life has called for a pre-emptive strike on North Korea?--Donald Trump



Similar Threads

  1. Absolute proof that unemployment is 20%
    By sofia in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-19-2009, 10:18 AM
  2. Absolute proof Dr. Paul is NOT a racist!
    By jmdrake in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-16-2007, 10:48 AM
  3. Absolute proof - hijacking of US foreign policy
    By susano in forum World News & Affairs
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-07-2007, 11:44 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •