Not if those other two are being taken by families that left foreclosured houses. You don't think the shadow inventory of empty foreclosed houses figures into these numbers? There's less actual properties available! You would be right if the housing sales market is strong, but it's not.
She is fed grain free (aka filler free) products like Eukanuba Naturally Wild - Venison and Sweet Potato recipe. No corn, no wheat, etc.You feed your dog dirt?
That's better than spending it on beer and the other crap Im seeing these loans and grants being spent on.
Last edited by devil21; 12-13-2012 at 02:19 PM.
"Let it not be said that we did nothing." - Ron Paul
"Always give your best, never get discouraged, never be petty; always remember, others may hate you, but those who hate you don't win unless you hate them, and then you destroy yourself. " - Nixon
Why most RPF members are against the US involvement with Israel explained by Mini-Me:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=218093
No anti-semitism, just logic.
Visiting the Outer Banks of NC?
Outer Banks Fishing Boat Rentals
If you think landlords have pricing power, then you have a very poor understanding of even basic microeconomics. Houses are very much a commodity. There isn't much one can do to differentiate a one house from another if they're in the same area - they were probably built by the same builder at the same time with the same materials and contain all the same fixtures. To suggest landlords have pricing power is asinine.
Student loan money can be used for living expenses. Always could be. That's why schools have an estimated cost of attendance which includes the cost of transportation and a place to live, among other costs.
Hogwash. That's like saying two Chevy Tahoes have the same value because they're off the same assembly lines, regardless of the amenities the manufacturer or dealer adds or the upgrades made by owner over the years or the amount of maintenance each has received. I don't know where you live but houses here are not all the same. Maybe when they were built in the 50's they were all the same but not anymore. Some are heavily upgraded, others are nearly as they were when they were built. Where -do- you live Jordan? Location bias probably has an impact, hence the anecdotal nature of my observations.
Glad Im paying for that through grants. Backdoor stimulus on my dime.Student loan money can be used for living expenses. Always could be. That's why schools have an estimated cost of attendance which includes the cost of transportation and a place to live, among other costs.
"Let it not be said that we did nothing." - Ron Paul
"Always give your best, never get discouraged, never be petty; always remember, others may hate you, but those who hate you don't win unless you hate them, and then you destroy yourself. " - Nixon
Why most RPF members are against the US involvement with Israel explained by Mini-Me:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=218093
No anti-semitism, just logic.
Visiting the Outer Banks of NC?
Outer Banks Fishing Boat Rentals
So then why didn't you go about explaining the distortion the shadow inventory is causing?
The fact remains, the folks rooming together taking up less units then they previously or otherwise would, are driving down the cost of rents and property values, not making them more expensive.
The split-up houses go at a higher rate than the rent-a-whole-house, and have for years. I paid $850, I think, as the rent on my house a few years ago (it may have been less; at this point my memory is fuzzy). The people across the street rented by the room, so there were four of them and the TOTAL they were paying was DOUBLE what I was paying to rent the entire house for myself. The individuals thought they were getting a great deal, of course, but the landlord was charging a huge markup.
Now, why doesn't everyone do that?
Well, your premise hinges on a few different factors. Let's round the numbers for the sake of argument, even though it will render them unrealistic. Let's say I was renting at $500/month for the whole house. The people across the street each pay $250/month for a total of $1000/month.
In your scenario, my landlord should have seen that an almost carbon copy of the house I am renting is renting for $1000/month, and been able to charge me that much. No dice. I would not pay that much, and there are oodles of apartments and houses that rent in the $500 range. Any variation beyond, say, a $100 increase is going to send me packing. My landlord can still set the rent, but they are locked in for the life of my contract. Once they give me notice that they are going to price a house at $1000/month rent, they are either going to attract roommates like my neighbors, or they are going to have an empty house... one that they will still have to maintain, in addition to paying to advertise the fact it is for rent unless they just leave it to languish on Craigslist.
In the meantime, in theory, my neighbors' landlord is raking in the dough. Not really. It was amusing to go visit them the first time and see the amount of damage that four college kids and their various pets could cause. Suffice to say that they were never, ever, getting a cent of their security deposit back. The landlord was going to have a losing battle suing them for the damage caused. The property, which once those four graduated or otherwise vacated was going to have to be rerented, needed a LOT of care and repair. There goes most of the "profit" we were discussing earlier, and then some.
In other words, there are a lot more factors at play here other than pure price.
Four school kids with pets? , probably paint, carpet , at least, in a years time.