Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 40

Thread: Report: Syrian military loading chemical weapons on to warplanes, awaiting orders

  1. #1

    Default Report: Syrian military loading chemical weapons on to warplanes, awaiting orders

    http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2...ads-order?lite

    Hope we stay out of it, but we probably won't.
    ...but when the trumpets blew again and the knights charged, the name they cried was "Stannis! Stannis! STANNIS!"



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2

    Default

    maybe an Obama win was a good thing?

  4. #3

    Default

    How about when the US sold Saddam chemical weapons & gave him gps coordinates on bomb the Kurds with them & then we invade him later for weapons of mass destruction.

    Sick F'ing Empire we live under.

  5. #4
    Member Pauls' Revere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    California (Socialized Hell)
    Posts
    4,246

    Default

    UPDATE:
    http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/...010311575.html

    U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has as recently as last week warned of the possibility that Assad could use chemical weapons against his own people. After meeting other NATO foreign ministers in Brussels last week, Clinton told the gathering, "Our concerns are that an increasingly desperate Assad regime might turn to chemical weapons, or might lose control of them to one of the many groups that are now operating within Syria."

    "We have sent an unmistakable message that this would cross a red line and those responsible would be held to account," she said.

    At the end of the meeting, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen backed up Clinton's threat, declaring that the international community could take military action against Assad and his forces.

    "The possible use of chemical weapons would be completely unacceptable for the whole international community and if anybody resorts to these terrible weapons I would expect an immediate reaction from the international community," Rasmussen told reporters.



    Where have I heard this before?
    - SUPPORT FREE TRADE, SMUGGLE -

    2 + 2 = 5.[/CENTER]

  6. #5

    Default

    We are on the verge of bombing another country... more bloodshed, more wasted money. Our money being used to kill people half a world away that have done nothing to us. Lord have mercy on us all.

  7. #6

    Default

    Its all in the way you do your killing, assad.
    Best of luck in life.

  8. #7

    Default

    Bet you that the sheeple believe this crap.....Again
    "Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can save it; no constitution, no law, no court can even do much to help it."
    James Madison

    "It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." - Samuel Adams



    Μολὼν λάβε
    Dum Spiro, Pugno
    Tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito

  9. #8

    Default

    Syrian military about to deploy chemical weapons?

    One word springs to mind....

    BULLSHIT

  10. #9

    Default

    The Caliphate has to be established somehow.Ask Clinton's Muslim Brotherhood advisor Huma Abedin http://shoebat.com/shoebat-foundation/huma-abedin/
    The LAND Of Israel Forever

    www.endofhistory.info

  11. #10

    Default

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/turkey-...border/5312896

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/syria-t...rnings/5314053

    Syria: The WMD “Justification” to Wage a “Preemptive War”: US Repeats Syrian Chemical Weapons “Warnings” By Tony Cartalucci
    Global Research, December 04, 2012


    Region: Middle East & North Africa
    Theme: US NATO War Agenda
    In-depth Report: SYRIA: NATO'S NEXT WAR?



    US repeats same tired, desperate accusations that the Syrian army is preparing to use “chemical weapons.”Once again, the US has issued a warning against Syria deploying “chemical weapons” citing “intelligence reports that the Damascus government is preparing such munitions for possible use.” No evidence was provided, nor any reasonable explanation as to why the Syrian government would deploy such weapons when, after over 2 years, the majority of the Syrian people still stand behind the government while terrorist forces flooding over Syria’s borders have been faced with constant tactical and strategic defeat.
    Image: (via the Guardian) “Chemical containers in the Libyan desert. There are concerns unguarded weapons could fall into the hands of Islamist militants. Photograph: David Sperry/AP” As increasing evidence reveals Libyan fighters and weapons are pouring into Syria, it seems the West is preparing to preempt the inevitability that Libya’s chemical arsenal has also found its way into the besieged nation.
    ….

    Despite attempts to portray Damascus and Aleppo as on the inevitable edge of collapse, now for a full 6 months, both cities are still firmly in the hands of government troops, with only symbolic terror attacks murdering scores of civilians at a time and temporary advances made on isolated bases before promptly being abandoned by NATO-backed terrorists – a pattern not unlike that facing Western forces in NATO-occupied Afghanistan.
    The accusations were printed in the Washington Post article, “Obama warns Syria amid rising concern over chemical weapons,” but despite the insinuations, includes the disclaimer (emphasis added), “Syria is thought to have several hundred surface-to-surface ballistic missiles capable of carrying chemical warheads.”
    Other nations “thought to have” weapons of mass destruction included Iraq, which in hindsight, after a 10 year war and occupation, following years of crippling sanctions leaving millions dead, turned out not to in fact have such weapons.
    It is unlikely that the Syrian government would use such weapons, thus giving the West the excuse it would need to directly intervene militarily, a scenario the West has been attempting to sell for the last 2 years, and particularly so following NATO’s military operations in Libya throughout 2011.
    Conversely, NATO’s proxy forces operating in Syria possess both the means and motivation to carry out chemical attacks, therefore blaming Syria’s government and granting the West the impetus needed to intervene more directly.
    NATO-backed Terrorists have the Means.
    Libya’s arsenal had fallen into the hands of sectarian extremists with NATO assistance last year in the culmination of efforts to overthrow the North African nation . Since then, Libya’s militants led by commanders of Al Qaeda’s Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) have armed sectarian extremists across the Arab World, from as far West as Mali, to as far East as Syria.
    In addition to small arms, heavier weapons are also making their way through this extensive network. The Washington Post in their article, “Libyan missiles on the loose,” reported:
    “Two former CIA counterterrorism officers told me last week that technicians recently refurbished 800 of these man-portable air-defense systems (known as MANPADS) — some for an African jihadist group called Boko Haram that is often seen as an ally of al-Qaeda — for possible use against commercial jets flying into Niger, Chad and perhaps Nigeria.”
    While undoubtedly these weapons are also headed to Niger, Chad, and perhaps Nigeria, they are veritably headed to Syria. Libyan LIFG terrorists are confirmed to be flooding into Syria from Libya. In November 2011, the Telegraph in their article, “Leading Libyan Islamist met Free Syrian Army opposition group,” would report:
    Abdulhakim Belhadj, head of the Tripoli Military Council and the former leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, “met with Free Syrian Army leaders in Istanbul and on the border with Turkey,” said a military official working with Mr Belhadj. “Mustafa Abdul Jalil (the interim Libyan president) sent him there.”
    Another Telegraph article, “Libya’s new rulers offer weapons to Syrian rebels,” would admit
    Syrian rebels held secret talks with Libya’s new authorities on Friday, aiming to secure weapons and money for their insurgency against President Bashar al-Assad’s regime, The Daily Telegraph has learned.
    At the meeting, which was held in Istanbul and included Turkish officials, the Syrians requested “assistance” from the Libyan representatives and were offered arms, and potentially volunteers.
    “There is something being planned to send weapons and even Libyan fighters to Syria,” said a Libyan source, speaking on condition of anonymity. “There is a military intervention on the way. Within a few weeks you will see.”
    Later that month, some 600 Libyan terrorists would be reported to have entered Syria to begin combat operations and have been flooding into the country ever since.

    Image: Libyan Mahdi al-Harati of the US State Department, United Nations, and the UK Home Office (page 5, .pdf)-listed terrorist organization, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), addressing fellow terrorists in Syria. Harati is now commanding a Libyan brigade operating inside of Syria attempting to destroy the Syrian government and subjugate the Syrian population. Traditionally, this is known as “foreign invasion.”
    ….

    Washington Post’s reported “loose missiles” in Libya are now turning up on the battlefield in Syria. While outfits like the Guardian, in their article “Arms and the Manpads: Syrian rebels get anti-aircraft missiles,” are reporting the missiles as being deployed across Syria, they have attempted to downplay any connection to Libya’s looted arsenal and the Al Qaeda terrorists that have imported them. In contrast, Times has published open admissions from terrorists themselves admitting they are receiving heavy weapons including surface-to-air missiles from Libya.
    In Time’s article, “Libya’s Fighters Export Their Revolution to Syria,” it is reported:
    Some Syrians are more frank about the assistance the Libyans are providing. “They have heavier weapons than we do,” notes Firas Tamim, who has traveled in rebel-controlled areas to keep tabs on foreign fighters. “They brought these weapons to Syria, and they are being used on the front lines.” Among the arms Tamim has seen are Russian-made surface-to-air missiles, known as the SAM 7.
    Libyan fighters largely brush off questions about weapon transfers, but in December they claimed they were doing just that. “We are in the process of collecting arms in Libya,” a Libyan fighter in Syria told the French daily Le Figaro. “Once this is done, we will have to find a way to bring them here.”
    Clearly NATO intervention in Libya has left a vast, devastating arsenal in the hands of sectarian extremists, led by US State Department, United Nations, and the UK Home Office (page 5, .pdf)-listed terrorist organization LIFG, that is now exporting these weapons and militants to NATO’s other front in Syria. It is confirmed that both Libyan terrorists and weapons are crossing the Turkish-Syrian border, with NATO assistance, and it is now clear that heavy weapons, including anti-aircraft weapons have crossed the border too.
    The Guardian reported in their November 2011 article, “Libyan chemical weapons stockpiles intact, say inspectors,” that:
    Libya’s stockpiles of mustard gas and chemicals used to make weapons are intact and were not stolen during the uprising that toppled Muammar Gaddafi, weapons inspectors have said.
    But also reported that:
    The abandonment or disappearance of some Gaddafi-era weapons has prompted concerns that such firepower could erode regional security if it falls into the hands of Islamist militants or rebels active in north Africa. Some fear they could be used by Gaddafi loyalists to spread instability in Libya.
    Last month Human Rights Watch urged Libya’s ruling national transitional council to take action over large numbers of heavy weapons, including surface-to-air missiles, it said were lying unguarded more than two months after Gaddafi was overthrown.On Wednesday the UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, said the UN would send experts to Libya to help ensure nuclear material and chemical weapons did not fall into the wrong hands.
    And while inspectors claim that Libya’s chemical weapons are in the “government’s” hands and not “extremists’,” it is clear by the Libyan government’s own admission, that they themselves are involved in sending fighters and weapons into Syria.
    It stands to reason that NATO-backed sectarian-extremists, directly affiliated with Al Qaeda and with the support of Libya’s government, will also acquire and bring chemical and biological weapons with them – with their use in Syria almost as inevitable as the West’s duplicity and spin that will be used to then blame it on the Syrian government.



    Last edited by HOLLYWOOD; 12-06-2012 at 06:35 PM.
    The American Dream, Wake Up People, This is our country! <===click

    "All eyes are opened, or opening to the rights of man, let the annual return of this day(July 4th), forever refresh our recollections of these rights, and an undiminished devotion to them."
    Thomas Jefferson
    June 1826



    Rock The World!
    USAF Veteran

  12. #11

    Default

    I think it is official United States policy to overthrow Syria according to many news reports.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/...8701OK20120801

  13. #12

    Default

    US Senator John Goyim McCain's prepared written speech, Juan parroted on all the Television media Blurps today...

    "Time about what to do is coming to a close, and we may instead be left with an awful and very difficult decision. Whether to continue on the sidelines and hope that "A Man(Assad) that has SLAUGHTERED nearly 40,000 Men, Woman, & Children in Syria. Will decide not to take the next step to use of far more destructive weapons, to kill significantly far more numbers of people. Or whether to take military action, the kind that could prevent a mass atrosity. If that is the choice we now face, it is a brave and sobering decision... "

    The Propaganda Machine(ALL corporate media avenues) being wound up to a full boil through the public relations firms of the DOD & White House, fiasco-corporate media for the final push for WAR in Syria, because the Tunisia, Egypt, Libya game plans are not working. Clowns figured their "Coolie-Cutter" over-throwing of governments and nations works the same everywhere.
    Last edited by HOLLYWOOD; 12-06-2012 at 06:36 PM.
    The American Dream, Wake Up People, This is our country! <===click

    "All eyes are opened, or opening to the rights of man, let the annual return of this day(July 4th), forever refresh our recollections of these rights, and an undiminished devotion to them."
    Thomas Jefferson
    June 1826



    Rock The World!
    USAF Veteran

  14. #13

    Default

    Smells like Yellow Cake.
    Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
    Ron Paul 2004

    Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
    It's all about Freedom

  15. #14
    Member paulbot24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Right Place Wrong Time
    Posts
    2,361

    Default

    I think the cake is burning. Or maybe it's the house.
    "Perfect safety is not the purpose of government." - Ron Paul

    Quote Originally Posted by brushfire View Post
    "I was in the rain forest once, and it rained on me..."
    Quote Originally Posted by Carson View Post
    Ron Paul suggested a very good first step to the process of restoring sound money... It was beautiful. It left them all standing with their fiats out.
    Quote Originally Posted by acptulsa View Post
    'Excuse us, we'll be leaving now. Oh, and you don't mind if we just steal this Constitution before we go? You @#$%s aren't using it anyway...'

  16. #15

    Default

    I posted a comment on my wall on Facebook last night asking liberals to join me in opposing a war with Syria, since they opposed the war in Iraq when Bush was President. But couldn't you guess? My liberal uncle commented and defended Obama's decision to send ground troops to Syria. It's amazing what blind partisanship does to people.
    1 Peter 1: 24-25

    For, "All people are like grass, and all their glory is like the flowers of the field; the grass withers and the flowers fall, but the word of the Lord endures forever."

  17. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Traditional Conservative View Post
    I posted a comment on my wall on Facebook last night asking liberals to join me in opposing a war with Syria, since they opposed the war in Iraq when Bush was President. But couldn't you guess? My liberal uncle commented and defended Obama's decision to send ground troops to Syria. It's amazing what blind partisanship does to people.
    Sure, when the Dems kill thousands it's a "humanitarian mission." When a Rep does it it's corporate empire.
    Something, something, something...Whatever my rage for the day.

  18. #17
    Member paulbot24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Right Place Wrong Time
    Posts
    2,361

    Default

    When he was younger he was probably protesting the wars. Where did the anti-war liberals go? That's right, there is only one party. I have to keep reminding myself that. Kind of like "There is no spoon." Classic re-conditioning.
    "Perfect safety is not the purpose of government." - Ron Paul

    Quote Originally Posted by brushfire View Post
    "I was in the rain forest once, and it rained on me..."
    Quote Originally Posted by Carson View Post
    Ron Paul suggested a very good first step to the process of restoring sound money... It was beautiful. It left them all standing with their fiats out.
    Quote Originally Posted by acptulsa View Post
    'Excuse us, we'll be leaving now. Oh, and you don't mind if we just steal this Constitution before we go? You @#$%s aren't using it anyway...'

  19. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Traditional Conservative View Post
    I posted a comment on my wall on Facebook last night asking liberals to join me in opposing a war with Syria, since they opposed the war in Iraq when Bush was President. But couldn't you guess? My liberal uncle commented and defended Obama's decision to send ground troops to Syria. It's amazing what blind partisanship does to people.
    ...but when the trumpets blew again and the knights charged, the name they cried was "Stannis! Stannis! STANNIS!"

  20. #19

    Default

    Assad is not that stupid to use chemical weapons... Using chemical weapons would effectively end his own life. It would give NATO/UN an excuse to go in and he'd be charge with war crime (if he is not dead) and be executed.

    It is like Iran getting a nuke and using it. They know they will be toast from counter attacks if they use it.

  21. #20

    Default

    Keep an eye out for False Flag chemical weapons, launched by al-queda.. whoops, i mean da rebels

  22. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vita3 View Post
    Keep an eye out for False Flag chemical weapons, launched by al-queda.. whoops, i mean da rebels
    I think it's almost a certainty that this will happen. Then of course they will meet together in a meeting of bogus minds and decide to implement a "no-fly" zone (plans for a no-fly zone was just approved by the Senate in this year's NDAA). Then the forcast will be partly cloudy with a chance of drone missiles.

  23. #22

    Default

    I'm surprised Russia and China would allow such an invasion... both lose their strategic location and deep sea ports... something is a miss.
    The American Dream, Wake Up People, This is our country! <===click

    "All eyes are opened, or opening to the rights of man, let the annual return of this day(July 4th), forever refresh our recollections of these rights, and an undiminished devotion to them."
    Thomas Jefferson
    June 1826



    Rock The World!
    USAF Veteran

  24. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HOLLYWOOD View Post
    I'm surprised Russia and China would allow such an invasion... both lose their strategic location and deep sea ports... something is a miss.
    Maybe China will let USA have Syria if USA let China have Taiwan or those small islands that is being contested between china/japan?
    Maybe Russia will let USA have Syria if USA let Russia have its way with some of the northern japanese islands?

  25. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Panama City Beach, FloriDUH
    Posts
    4,244

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alucard13mmfmj View Post
    Maybe China will let USA have Syria if USA let China have Taiwan or those small islands that is being contested between china/japan?
    Maybe Russia will let USA have Syria if USA let Russia have its way with some of the northern japanese islands?
    I was thinking of exactly this earlier. Something else is going on behind the scenes here.

    I was at a friend's earlier and the news was on. I also noticed that the same EXACT characters pushing us into Iraq and Afghanistan are the same ones on TV now. Unreal how short the American attention span is nowadays.
    EX-USCG


    What is the difference between a hero and a cop? A hero will not hesitate to risk his life to protect your safety, a cop will not hesitate to risk your life to protect his safety.
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
    Authoritarian leftists. Political prisoners. Gulags. Where are we again?

  26. #25

    Default

    Russia has always been defensive about not having many warm water ports for its navy. I doubt Russia would negotiate away Syria, nor would they allow a US puppet government anywhere near that port.

  27. #26

    Default

    bs.

  28. #27

    Default

    Excellent Drudge tweet today:

    MATT DRUDGE

    @DRUDGE
    Obama playing up 'WMD' threat in Syria is bold and hysterical. Who will go to UN to show 'evidence' this time? Maybe one of the Rices...


    By the way Celente killed it on this on Alex Jones today too:

    ...but when the trumpets blew again and the knights charged, the name they cried was "Stannis! Stannis! STANNIS!"

  29. #28

    Default

    Alright. Why do our dear leaders of unimpeachable wisdom choose to threaten another country with force VIA massively consumed media? Come the freak on, THEY ARE NOT TALKING TO ASSAD IN THESE INTERVIEWS... they are talking to us. It is conditioning. Propaganda. The real, overt-covert stuff.
    Best of luck in life.

  30. #29

    Default

    Why does it matter anyway? How is a dead rebel with a bullet through his head or one blown up by a bomb from a Syrian jet any different than one who died from breathing in gas?
    "Ted Cruz has gone out of his way to tell people how much he agrees with me on national security." -John McCain

  31. #30

    Default

    McCain was on FOX shortly after Amash pushing his dream of going to war with Syria.
    I have many friends in the libertarian movement who look down on those of us who get involved in political activity,
    he acknowledged, but "eventually, if you want to bring about changes what you have to do is participate in political
    action.
    -- Ron Paul


    "We do have some differences and our approaches will be different, but that makes him his own person. I mean why should he [Rand] be a clone and do everything and think just exactly as I have. I think it's an opportunity to be independent minded. We are about 99% the same on issues." "People Try To Drive Wedges Between Rand And Me." --Ron Paul

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=pB5JgzBVHN0

    The Property Basis of Rights

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast





« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •