I don't give a shit what they do there. As my husband used to say," fuck them all but 6 and save them for pall bearers."
But for Gods sakes quit giving anyone there our tax dollars to kill people.
Greg Brannon for US Senate 2014 - North Carolina
"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." - Lord Acton
"Foreign aid is taking money from the poor people of a rich country, and giving it to the rich people of a poor country." - Ron Paul
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Benjamin Franklin
"Beware the Military-Industrial-Financial-Corporate-Media-Government Complex." - B4L update of General Dwight D. Eisenhower
"Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem." - Ronald Reagan
"The only thing we have to fear is fear itself, and we must reject those who spread fear." - B4L update of FDR
"The Ministry of Truth can turn on a dime, and the fury of the ignorant masses can be redirected at will." - B4L
"Marxists become Fascists the minute they become rich, yet they retain the Marxist rhetoric." - B4L
"Debt is the drug, Wall St. Banksters are the dealers, and politicians are the addicts." - B4L
"Totally free immigration? I've never taken that position. I believe in national sovereignty." - Ron Paul
Twitter: B4Liberty@USAB4L
So you are clearly saying that the Israelis are similar to the Nazi's. I would like to know how far the batshit crazy goes.
If different Indian tribes decided to blow themselves up in major cities in retaliation for taking Indian land years ago, would you think that is justified? If the suicide bombings persisted and treaties continued to be broken by the Indians would you compare the United States government to Nazis if the government retaliated against the suicide bombings by dropping bombs on Indian reservations?
Are Native Americans in the above scenario that different from Palestinians?
Last edited by misean; 11-18-2012 at 02:26 PM.
It's not really the same thing, because Israel belonged to the Jewish people originally. It was land that was promised to the Jewish people in the Old Testament. They were then kicked out of their land by the Romans around 70 AD. So the correct analogy would be if you originally owned a house, were kicked out by someone else who then took over the house, and then that person left the house eventually and a different person moved in. Then someone comes along and offers to kick the current occupants out of the house so that you can get the house back that you first owned, and you accept the offer.
1. Hebrews were not the first to rule that region, they didn't even come close to being the longest rulers. And unless there's some 1,000+year-old Hebrews out there...invalid.
2. God is not a real estate agent and has nothing to do with a UN created state, unless you think the UN is the hand of God at work.
3. As has been said, there's not really even much of a blood relation to European Jews--who make up the majority. You could make a partial argument for Sephardic Jews--but even they're treated as 2nd tier citizens in Israel.
Children should not be used as human shields. What is this first grade? You're the one saying it was a failure at conjuring an emotional reaction; I wasn't trying to even do that I don't demagogue the issues. I was making a point that Israel grossly over reacts.
Israel is an apartheid state. Unfort for Israel nothing they do except leave is moral.
Btw wasn't calling you racist. Try to relax.
Are you asking was AIM justified? Hell yes it was, and even the government agreed, since charges were eventually dropped.
Oh, and we aren't building settlements on Indian reservations, and forcefully bulldozing Indian houses to build new apartment complexes for white Christians only. That's what we would have to be doing to be anywhere near analogous to Israel... ...not to mention the killings and imprisoning of tens of thousands of Indians a decade.
Last edited by UWDude; 11-18-2012 at 06:19 PM.