The libertarians I run around with are mixed in whether or not they'll be voting for Romney or writing in Paul (a vote for Obama is, of course, unthinkable). However, one comment that I keep hearing confuses me because it ignore history. That is, they will say that the deficit will continue to go up no matter who is elected. Really?
Romney took Massachusetts from debt to surplus (didn't raise taxes either). The Olympics hired him for the specific purpose of getting rid of their debt. All he's ever done is successfully eliminate debt. So why would someone think he wouldn't do it when even more eyes are on him to do so? I get that he's not the perfect candidate, but in terms of sending the debt and deficit the other way (thus helping the weak dollar) I can't see how I can logically doubt he'd do it. Obama on the other hand, only has a history of debt (record debt in fact).
So what are your thoughts?
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us