What I understood, no matter what disease your kid has, the free market would still want to have an insurance policy towards him. Thinking about 1913 and the contracts that doctors made on yearly service by new insurance policies, people enjoyed health care plus it was about $20 - $40 (talking about current 2012). Doctors would be fighting to get as many contracts as possible, no matter the illness. Though we may have the cost/analysis argument, families would have been able to give insurance to their kids in case of any terrible event. I believe in the long run, insurance companies would profit from people that inherent any disease that may happen; and if not, we do have the hospitaleers.
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us