[VIDEO ADDED] Ron Paul speaking in Victoria, TX 10/13/12 GREAT speech & Q & A!!

[tsai3904]

Congressman Ron Paul to Appear in Victoria

Congressman Paul to ride in parade, speak at Victoria College

Lake Jackson, TX – Congressman Ron Paul, along with his wife Carol, will ride in the Victoria GOP parade entry in Saturday's "Parade That Never Was" honoring all Vietnam War veterans as well as families who lost loved ones in the war.

He will also be speaking after the parade at the Victoria College Student Center located at 2200 E Red River in Victoria at 1:00 pm.

The parade begins at 10:00 am this Saturday, October 13th in downtown Victoria.

http://paul.house.gov/index.php?opti...press-releases

[sailingaway]

Excellent! and then Utah on the 18th!!

+rep promised for a video!

[eleganz]

So awesome!

[sailingaway]

BUMP FOR REPORTS ON EVENT????

Youtube anyone?

here is a write up of the event, but it doesn't even mention Ron: http://m.victoriaadvocate.com/news/2...4_191083/?news

and this just says he was 'also in attendance' and the video shows a very blurry picture of Carol and him on a float. I count on our people to get a youtube up of his rally, if not the parade!

[mit26chell]

Video!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xpi6EEx3TnM



An amazing speech.

[sailingaway]

Thank you! I embedded it. I am going to put it into the OP.

[jkr]

b
u
m
p

[sailingaway]

Interesting. I'm not done with the questions after it, but the first was about people writing him in, and he said he doesn't want to mislead people that he is going to win that way, but if people are completely fed up and want to vote for him, he neither discourages or encourages it. He won't sign paperwork because there are FEC implications (in CA I know if you give donations to a write in candidate it is under the standard reporting rules for candidates.) He says that is like asking the IRS to audit him, and he doesn't want that. However, he said if people were going to get attention to issues through a write in campaign, he thinks that could be good, and that the thing would be to try to hold their feet to the fire to make them count them.

You can watch it for yourself, though, that is a paraphrase.

He also talks about Romney maybe being a little better on some issues, and Obama maybe being a little better on others, but if you are an interventionist you feel like you have the right to do anything to anybody at any time, so there is little comfort in either (essentially).

He also speaks of what he sees happening in the lame duck congress.

[sailingaway]

OK, I've seen the whole thing. I really like it when he does Q&As, and his crowds have been too big, lately, for that. However, I still want a big crowd for his Utah Valley Univ appearance on 10/18!

[ClydeCoulter]

Audience: "Would Romney be better for America than Obama?"
Ron: "I think, uhhhm, not necessarily. No"

Truth

[sailingaway]

Yeah, he has always told his constituents the truth as best he knew it. He makes a point of it, since only with an informed citizenry can they properly vote to be represented.

He is solid right down to his foundation.

[Dick Chaney]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHPJ...eature=g-all-u

False-flag terrorist attack? Iran War? I wonder what he's thinking...

[MoneyWhereMyMouthIs2]

It's a 45 minute video. (so i have not seen it all yet) However, I think any of us could predict that "A Major Event Could Occur during the Next Administration." It's 4 years, and the whole world is generally in deep $#@! right now, with no end in sight.

[Dick Chaney]

It's a 45 minute video. I think any of us could predict that "A Major Event Could Occur during the Next Administration." It's 4 years, and the whole world is generally in deep $#@! right now.

[brandon]

$#@! man even tele-psychics are more specific than that.

[Dick Chaney]

Well $#@!, don't blame me, I'm not the one who said it.

[sailingaway]

I watched this, it is the Victoria Texas appearance. The first about 25 minutes are his speech, and after that is Q & A. I believe this was in the Q & A, and in response to the question of did he think one, Romney or Obama was better than the other. (Answer, not really, one might be a hair better on one element, the other might be a hair better on another.) He was talking generally about how things were building up and neither candidate was going to take the major steps to stop them, that he couldn't say exactly when something would happen but whomever wins is going to have to face major events (or a major event) and he doesn't think either is up to it, is what I took from it. But I watched this yesterday. He WAS more specific than during the campaign, speaking to a smaller group of his constituents, it was a good video. But I don't specifically remember the context of that comment.

[acptulsa]

Fine. I'll be specific.

During the next four years, the FRN 'dollar' will come to have less spending power than the penny did in 1913. And if you don't consider that a major event, educate yourself.

[mit26chell]

Pretty sure he was referring to the event that will initiate the end of the dollar in this speech. Just watched it
yesterday

[jolynna]

Pretty sure he was referring to the event that will initiate the end of the dollar in this speech. Just watched it
yesterday

That is why war was invented.

So you can distract with the patriotism ploy, "We've all got to sacrifice." (Never mind that our sacrifice is for the elites with hidden underground bunkers or cities who will be guzzling down champagne and will never have to make their own beds--EVER!)

People don't notice vaporized (disappeared money that never existed in the first place) with the distraction of war either. Blame the deprivation, the end of the dollar as a reserve currencey, and everything people don't like on the enemy.

If the war goes nuclear, less people will be in the world to divy up what remains.


In my opinion.

[sailingaway]

That is why war was invented.

So you can distract with the patriotism ploy, "We've all got to sacrifice." (Never mind that our sacrifice is for the elites with hidden underground bunkers or cities who will be guzzling down champagne and will never have to make their own beds--EVER!)

People don't notice vaporized (disappeared money that never existed in the first place) with the distraction of war either. Blame the deprivation, the end of the dollar as a reserve currencey, and everything people don't like on the enemy.

If the war goes nuclear, less people will be in the world to divy up what remains.


In my opinion.

Absolutely. I think 9/11 was mass gross negligence never exposed, not 'an inside job', however, look how about a week before that $2.4 TRILLION had gone missing at the Dept of Defense, and how it wiped any mention of that off the front page. In fact, the only action taken as a result, as far as I can tell, is to remove the ability to audit the Department of Defense.

And there were those billions on pallets when we went into Iraq etc etc. War is definitely good cover if you are looting a nation, or the various nations, regardless of if it is calculated to be such.

[JK/SEA]

Well $#@!, don't blame me, I'm not the one who said it.

is that why your first name is Dick?