If the Austrian School had any shame (they don't) they would be ashamed of Hans-Hermann Hoppe.
I refuted every substantial claim he made, and you know it.Since you did not refute one damn point with any of your "plenty of empirical evidence to the contrary".
BWAHAHAHHAHAAAA!I will take your rant for what it is: a concession of the debate.
That's not all I had; you know it; the great majority of what I wrote precisely identified the factual and logical deficiencies in Hoppe's "argument." You know this. You are just lying about it.When all you have is name calling and insults, it means you have no case to be made at all.
What else can one say about bald lies?"Lie, lie ,lie, Flat-out lie, meeza hatesa gubmint".