MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT: Lawyers for Ron Paul Lawsuit NOTE: Having the lawsuit not up 4 debate

[MoneyWhereMyMouthIs2]

So are Lawyers for Ron Paul employed by Ron Paul? The name is throwing me and I havent had time to read all of this.

It does not appear that way. I'm naturally suspicious of who they are, but I'll say that about anyone I see in a grocery store parking lot. It's gonna take awhile to figure this all out.

[No1butPaul]

It would be interesting if the David Calihan that is working with the Lawyers for Ron Paul were the David Callahan you are referencing.

Ha...nice catch

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

No. This is not true. We are telling them to abide by contracts.

The breaking of those contracts had economic consequences to many GOP voters who paid to finance their candidate. I smell another lawsuit.

[TheGrinch]

The fact that I just upvoted this thread with 5 stars and it didn't budge from 3 stars should show how many trolls counter-productive of our efforts are among us.

It's one thing to be skeptical about this doing more harm than good (though I'm coming around to the "give 'em hell' side), but sorry, only a troll would dispute that what these lawyers are trying to accomplish isn't admirable after the nasty tactics they've resorted to.

As someone who personally knows some of those in Athens and Cobb, GA who were disenfranchised, I maybe have too personal of a stake in this, but if this can at least draw publicity to how corrupt they all are to try to maintain their power, then it's totally worth it.

The "campaign" might have to be against it for obvious PR reasons, but just like Ron understood that Rand had to do what he had to do, I'm sure he understands that we have to do what we have to do... Let's just do it the right way...

[muzzled dogg]

Is this major news?

[zachrbroussard]

Is this major news?

Is a lawsuit against the GOP to unbind delegates a big deal? Are the allegations of large scale voter fraud a big deal? Is it a big deal that this is evidence of large scale voter fraud?

YES

[jcannon98188]

Is this major news?

A challenge in the 9th district court that could potentially alter the very course of this election, and could result in hundreds of criminal charges being filed against our enemies? Yes, this could be considered major.

[muzzled dogg]

I did not consider the lawsuits challenging an incumbent president's eligibility to be major news because I knew how they'd turn out

[Eisenhower]

I did not consider the lawsuits challenging an incumbent president's eligibility to be major news because I knew how they'd turn out

Who are you, Doug Wead?

[CPUd]

There is also the mutiny takeover of the Ron Paul Campaign.

[Eisenhower]

There is also the mutiny takeover of the Ron Paul Campaign.

lol

[MoneyWhereMyMouthIs2]

Who are you, Doug Wead?

Apparently, he's a realist with a track record of 1-0.

As far as this being something "taking over the Paul Campaign," that statement itself makes me suspicious. Why can't they do their thing without claiming they're taking over something that doesn't belong to them? Or why wouldn't they say they are supporting the Paul Campaign or say they are supporting delegates?

Also, they are "taking over the Paul Campaign" and fighting for everyone's delegates? I understand that latter is the right thing to do, but there's no reason to make the former statement if that is your intent.

[CPUd]

Apparently, he's a realist with a track record of 1-0.

As far as this being something "taking over the Paul Campaign," that statement itself makes me suspicious. Why can't they do their thing without claiming they're taking over something that doesn't belong to them? Or why wouldn't they say they are supporting the Paul Campaign or say they are supporting delegates?

Also, they are "taking over the Paul Campaign" and fighting for everyone's delegates? I understand that latter is the right thing to do, but there's no reason to make the former statement if that is your intent.

I'm still unclear on this at the moment and hoping when they form an executive committee, they will do more to separate campaign efforts from the lawsuit. Their justification for taking over the campaign has to do with recent events that indicated a Presidential Campaign is working detrimental to its purpose - running for President, and disenfranchising delegates in the process.

[Barrex]

The fact that I just upvoted this thread with 5 stars and it didn't budge from 3 stars should show how many trolls counter-productive of our efforts are among us.

It's one thing to be skeptical about this doing more harm than good (though I'm coming around to the "give 'em hell' side), but sorry, only a troll would dispute that what these lawyers are trying to accomplish isn't admirable after the nasty tactics they've resorted to.

As someone who personally knows some of those in Athens and Cobb, GA who were disenfranchised, I maybe have too personal of a stake in this, but if this can at least draw publicity to how corrupt they all are to try to maintain their power, then it's totally worth it.

The "campaign" might have to be against it for obvious PR reasons, but just like Ron understood that Rand had to do what he had to do, I'm sure he understands that we have to do what we have to do... Let's just do it the right way...

4 stars now and I agree about "counter productive" people...Had major disagreement with one of them in another thread...

For those asking what Ron thinks about this I allready answered in this post there is a video with Ron Paul speaking about fraud and what he wishes people would do:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...=1#post4495638

(post is too long to repost it...)

This is grassroots project and not campaigns or Ron Pauls.... but both campaign and Ron Paul and Mitt (it is not both it is____? throuth? seriously what is it?) know that this lawsuit was coming (in non sexual way).

[muzzled dogg]

Who are you, Doug Wead?

Not last time I checked. He worked for bush. I despise bush

[jemuf]

I think there's a major problem with all this "takeover" talk. What if Ron Paul doesn't want to be president? He doesn't have to be sworn in.

And this logic applies to a write-in campaign. I wish Ron Paul would come out with a statement regarding Lawyers for Ron Paul or a write-in campaign.

[eleganz]

I think there's a major problem with all this "takeover" talk. What if Ron Paul doesn't want to be president? He doesn't have to be sworn in.

And this logic applies to a write-in campaign. I wish Ron Paul would come out with a statement regarding Lawyers for Ron Paul or a write-in campaign.

Are you kidding? Being President is the best way for him to get his message out. He could have a freakin daily liberty class if he wanted to.

Since when was he ever selfish about the development of the movement? He will do anything for this movement, saving this country is something that he'll never back down from.

[davidt!]

They just accused the Romney campaign of being a criminal organization, and said Mitt is not the lesser of 2 evils, he is evil. He also says when the judge renders a positive decision, mitt will have 0 delegates.

Not according to Rand Paul...

[jay_dub]

I think there's a major problem with all this "takeover" talk. What if Ron Paul doesn't want to be president? He doesn't have to be sworn in.

And this logic applies to a write-in campaign. I wish Ron Paul would come out with a statement regarding Lawyers for Ron Paul or a write-in campaign.

Well, after 3 tries, he better be ready!!

[opinionatedfool]

Not last time I checked. He worked for bush. I despise bush

He's definitely a pro liberty person now though.

[LibertyEagle]

Apparently, he's a realist with a track record of 1-0.

As far as this being something "taking over the Paul Campaign," that statement itself makes me suspicious. Why can't they do their thing without claiming they're taking over something that doesn't belong to them? Or why wouldn't they say they are supporting the Paul Campaign or say they are supporting delegates?

Also, they are "taking over the Paul Campaign" and fighting for everyone's delegates? I understand that latter is the right thing to do, but there's no reason to make the former statement if that is your intent.

I agree. That part bothered me too.

[liberty2897]

Sorry if this was already posted. I didn't read through every single page of this thread.



http://electionfraudremedy.com/

I don't know anything more about this other than watching / listening to the video. Sounds interesting.

[opinionatedfool]

Does Ron know he has a new campaign staff ?

I don't get the whole "taking over the campaign thing. What do they mean? Are they taking over the actual campaign or just metaphorically?

[CPUd]

I don't get the whole "taking over the campaign thing. What do they mean? Are they taking over the actual campaign or just metaphorically?

They claim they are forming an Executive Committee

[opinionatedfool]

They claim they are forming an Executive Committee

Lol, whatever that means

[No1butPaul]

Less than 24 hrs. and more than 14,000 views, yet the msm is silent...it is deafening...we can't report this because we have covered up everything else and couldn't explain it to our viewers/readers. Keeping them honest doesn't apply to us or the RNC.

[muh_roads]

They said they are taking over the campaign "unofficially" and something to the effect of "whether they like it or not". They firmly believe the Paul campaign was hijacked to make it fall apart.

Tonight's special edition folks is called "Lawyers who love Alex Jones". I'm not going to put too much faith in this really going anywhere.

[Ivash]

Less than 24 hrs. and more than 14,000 views, yet the msm is silent...it is deafening...we can't report this because we have covered up everything else and couldn't explain it to our viewers/readers. Keeping them honest doesn't apply to us or the RNC.

In today's day and age 14,000 views is nothing. Videos with many, many times that get no notice by the media. I'm sure the media would think this is the act of a group of sore losers rather than anything significant, anyways.

[JK/SEA]

In today's day and age 14,000 views is nothing. Videos with many, many times that get no notice by the media. I'm sure the media would think this is the act of a group of sore losers rather than anything significant, anyways.

who cares what the media thinks at this point...the main question is, what do you think?

[No1butPaul]

who cares what the media thinks at this point...the main question is, what do you think?

I know what I know...like miss daisy

b/t/w - why has everything become a matter of confrontation lately on this forum...
aren't we on the same team? I support Ron Paul and liberty, you?