Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 54

Thread: Ben Swann interviews Rand Paul

  1. #1

    Default Ben Swann interviews Rand Paul

    Zatch



  • #2

    Default

    Rand looks and sounds exhausted.

  • #3
    Member Keith and stuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    The Live Free or Die state
    Posts
    6,008
    Blog Entries
    65

    Default

    I loved the interview. I support Ben Swann and Rand Paul.

  • #4

    Default

    How could any liberty advocate not feel good about what Rand is doing and planning?

  • #5

    Default

    Thank you, Ben.
    "We do have some differences and our approaches will be different, but that makes him his own person. I mean why should he [Rand] be a clone and do everything and think just exactly as I have. I think it's an opportunity to be independent minded. We are about 99% the same on issues." "People Try To Drive Wedges Between Rand And Me." --Ron Paul

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=pB5JgzBVHN0


  • #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sola_Fide View Post
    How could any liberty advocate not feel good about what Rand is doing and planning?
    I don't know. I feel pretty terrible that he's advocating the continuation of social security and medicare "in perpetuity," wants everyone to contribute to paying taxes, and introduced a bill to give back door approval to drones here in America while claiming he's somehow limiting their use.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Paul
    Perhaps the most important lesson from Obamacare is that while liberty is lost incrementally, it cannot be regained incrementally. The federal leviathan continues its steady growth; sometimes boldly and sometimes quietly. Obamacare is just the latest example, but make no mistake: the statists are winning. So advocates of liberty must reject incremental approaches and fight boldly for bedrock principles.

  • #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Feeding the Abscess View Post
    I don't know. I feel pretty terrible that he's advocating the continuation of social security and medicare "in perpetuity," wants everyone to contribute to paying taxes, and introduced a bill to give back door approval to drones here in America while claiming he's somehow limiting their use.
    The thing is, any Senator who suggests getting rid of SS and Medicare right now, will be shot out of the water. Regarding taxes, as long as we have them I agree that everyone should have to pay something. Why wouldn't they? If enough people get ticked off about paying them, then they might finally take a stand.

    Yeah, I wasn't too thrilled with his bill, amendment, or whatever it was, about drones. It looks like he's trying to improve the law that is already on the books, but I would have rather it go a lot further. Like no drones at all on American citizens. But, maybe he thought it wouldn't pass and is going to attack it incrementally. I've thought about calling his office and asking, but I haven't yet. Have you, by chance?
    "We do have some differences and our approaches will be different, but that makes him his own person. I mean why should he [Rand] be a clone and do everything and think just exactly as I have. I think it's an opportunity to be independent minded. We are about 99% the same on issues." "People Try To Drive Wedges Between Rand And Me." --Ron Paul

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=pB5JgzBVHN0


  • #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Keith and stuff View Post
    I loved the interview. I support Ben Swann and Rand Paul.
    Paul/Swann 2016.

  • #9

    Default

    I think it's great that Ben gets to interview Rand Paul on his show. The guy has done so much for the movement, it's nice that we can help his career a bit with a high-profile interview that would normally never happen.

  • #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LibertyEagle View Post
    The thing is, any Senator who suggests getting rid of SS and Medicare right now, will be shot out of the water. Regarding taxes, as long as we have them I agree that everyone should have to pay something. Why wouldn't they? If enough people get ticked off about paying them, then they might finally take a stand.

    Yeah, I wasn't too thrilled with his bill, amendment, or whatever it was, about drones. It looks like he's trying to improve the law that is already on the books, but I would have rather it go a lot further. Like no drones at all on American citizens. But, maybe he thought it wouldn't pass and is going to attack it incrementally. I've thought about calling his office and asking, but I haven't yet. Have you, by chance?
    I haven't. I need to type something up and essentially read it when calling, otherwise my anger might get the best of me on the call.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Paul
    Perhaps the most important lesson from Obamacare is that while liberty is lost incrementally, it cannot be regained incrementally. The federal leviathan continues its steady growth; sometimes boldly and sometimes quietly. Obamacare is just the latest example, but make no mistake: the statists are winning. So advocates of liberty must reject incremental approaches and fight boldly for bedrock principles.

  • Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •