U.S. And Israel Enlist Jihadist Terrorists To Bring Down Syria

[John F Kennedy III]

U.S. And Israel Enlist Jihadist Terrorists To Bring Down Syria

Saman Mohammadi
Infowars.com
Sunday, June 10, 2012

In Syria, the U.S. and Israel are sponsoring Jihadist terrorists to destroy the unity of Syria and bring down the current Syrian government. As a result, the moral and intellectual arguments for the U.S.-led war on terror are being exposed as propaganda talking points that have no logical connections to the real world.

The U.S. and Israeli governments cannot be taken seriously when they try to sell to the world the lie that Islamic terrorism is a threat to Western civilization while it is secretly funding and arming Sunni terrorists to wage war against governments that they don’t like.

We don’t have to point to the false flag 9/11 events as an example of state-sponsored terrorism by the U.S. and Israeli governments. There is endless evidence in Syria that points to a coordinated policy of state-sponsored terrorism against the Syrian people by Washington and Tel Aviv.

Washington’s alliance with Jihadist terrorists is coming out into the daylight in Syria, Libya, and other nations that have experienced the CIA’s “Arab Spring.” Rob Prince wrote an excellent article on June 3rd about this unholy alliance called, “Tunisia’s Salafists: Brownshirts of the Arab Spring.” Prince said:


“The British and the U.S. prefer the more placid and ‘west-oriented’ face of ‘moderate Islamic parties’ like Tunisia’s Ennahda which claims to respect democratic processes. But when necessary, London and Washington have not hesitated to cooperate with more fanatical elements — be they Saudi Wahhabists or now Syrian jihadists. Besides the anti-Arab secular nationalist bond that unites U.S. foreign policy with Islamists, there is a bond of another kind: they see eye to eye economically. The Moslem Brotherhoods in Egypt, Ennahda in Tunisia, and Salafists throughout the region are all comfortable with and support the kind of neoliberal economic policies the United States and Europe pursue. They have opposed trade union rights, strong state-directed economic policies. When it comes to neoliberal economics, openness to foreign corporate and financial penetration, the Islamists and U.S. policymakers are in complete harmony.”

The U.S.-Israeli-Jihadist war against Syria has produced a humanitarian crisis that the Western media is deliberately and criminally misrepresentingto the world. It is now clear beyond any shadow of a doubt that the guilty party in the Houla massacre was the foreign-armed Syrian opposition.

There is dissent within the loosely assembled, highly unpopular, and murderous opposition, with the more moral members breaking ranks and admitting to a German reporter named Rainer Hermann that their bloodthirsty partners were responsible for the Houla massacre.


rest of article here:
http://disquietreservations.blogspot...-jihadist.html

[alucard13mmfmj]

American's don't want to see that they are in the wrong and are the ones manufacturing terrorism... We are as wrong as our politicians/elite/bankers. The majority do nothing or reject what is wrong with their country. You give the people evidence, but they reject it and always want to see the USA as being righteous and good.

Jihadist caused so much trouble with USA.. now USA want to work with them.

[Muwahid]

Or the Syrians are fed up with Assad murdering children, and therefore are revolting.

But that would make too much sense.

[paulbot24]

Or the Syrians are fed up with Assad murdering children, and therefore are revolting.

But that would make too much sense.

You really believe the "rebel forces" fighting Assad are the citizens in the towns of Syria? I've heard Assad chops off the hands of Red Cross nurses too.

[Muwahid]

Yes? I have family in Jordan who witnessed riots in the streets and the beating of police officers and regime supporters, and by all accounts the Arab Spring in Jordan was very mild, so times that intensity by a few thousand across the border. They don't like Assad, him and his father are considered complete criminals in the Arab world. I met a lot of Syrians there on the run from the regime too.

I don't see why people fighting a dictator is somehow strange.

[paulbot24]

YOURS:Yes? I have family in Jordan who witnessed riots in the streets and the beating of police officers and regime supporters, and by all accounts the Arab Spring in Jordan was very mild, so times that intensity by a few thousand across the border. They don't like Assad, him and his father are considered complete criminals in the Arab world. I met a lot of Syrians there on the run from the regime too.

I don't see why people fighting a dictator is somehow strange.

MINE:I have family in America who witnessed riots in the streets and the beating of police officers and freedom supporters. They don't like Obama, him and his predecessor are considered complete criminals in most of the world. I meet a lot of Americans here on the run from the Obama administration too.

I don't see why people fighting a dictator is somehow strange.

Sounds like we have more in common than we have differences.

[donnay]

Remember the U.S.S. Liberty!!!!!!!

[Muwahid]

YOURS:Yes? I have family in Jordan who witnessed riots in the streets and the beating of police officers and regime supporters, and by all accounts the Arab Spring in Jordan was very mild, so times that intensity by a few thousand across the border. They don't like Assad, him and his father are considered complete criminals in the Arab world. I met a lot of Syrians there on the run from the regime too.

I don't see why people fighting a dictator is somehow strange.

MINE:I have family in America who witnessed riots in the streets and the beating of police officers and freedom supporters. They don't like Obama, him and his predecessor are considered complete criminals in most of the world. I meet a lot of Americans here on the run from the Obama administration too.

I don't see why people fighting a dictator is somehow strange.

Sounds like we have more in common than we have differences.

Lol now imagine people are saying the liberty movement here, is Russia trying to destabilize America or something. This shit happens, people get fed up and revolt, the Assad regime is a small religious minority ruling over a majority (who happen to hate eachother). Again I don't see what's so strange about people in Syria revolting against Assad these posts all seem to act as if Assad and his government are so free and amazing that no one could possibly want to remove him from power.

[paulbot24]

Lol now imagine people are saying the liberty movement here, is Russia trying to destabilize America or something. This shit happens, people get fed up and revolt, the Assad regime is a small religious minority ruling over a majority (who happen to hate eachother). Again I don't see what's so strange about people in Syria revolting against Assad these posts all seem to act as if Assad and his government are so free and amazing that no one could possibly want to remove him from power.

Absolutely not what I mean. It is not about some misconception about Assad being free and amazing at all. That would be called delusional. It is about funding a variety of groups that we "do not negotiate with", that can't even get along with eachother, all the while pretending to not be involved. Whether you want to believe there are American special ops there is up to you. This is about hypocrisy. This is about regime change instead of letting the Syrians make this happen for themselves. What happens to the Syrian people later when we have achieved OUR end objectives? What is strange is you say you have close connections to the region and you have no idea what I am talking about. You don't hang out with any Iranians, Iraqis, Afghans, Pakistanis, or Libyans I take it? Sit down with one, have a few drinks, and then have yourself a talk. Not too many. Just enough to loosen up a bit. Don't try to match them one for one though, because they will drink you under the table very easily. There is a reason for that.

[Muwahid]

Absolutely not what I mean. It is not about some misconception about Assad being free and amazing at all. That would be called delusional. It is about funding a variety of groups that we "do not negotiate with", that can't even get along with eachother, all the while pretending to not be involved. Whether you want to believe there are American special ops there is up to you. This is about hypocrisy. This is about regime change instead of letting the Syrians make this happen for themselves. What happens to the Syrian people later when we have achieved OUR end objectives? What is strange is you say you have close connections to the region and you have no idea what I am talking about. You don't hang out with any Iranians, Iraqis, Afghans, Pakistanis, or Libyans I take it? Sit down with one, have a few drinks, and then have yourself a talk. Not too many. Just enough to loosen up a bit. That should straighten things out.

I have friends from Afghanistan/Pakistan who have lived there, maany Syrian friends (vast majority here are Syrians), I've had numerous Iranian friends (both Shia and Sunni) I'm part Iraqi and Kurd myself, and there were some refugees who came here that my brother got to know and heard their stories, but no can't say I know any Libyans

I have no idea what you're talking about because you're original premise is fallacious. The feds around here did get real interested in Syrians lately because of the uprising and I'm sure America has it's concerns and may want to steer the revolt, but to say they are enlisting "terrorists" to blow stuff up and attack the Syrian regime (who I guess in your opinion wants to negotiate?) is just against anything I've heard from what's going on there.

The FSA is real, and large, and I'm sure there's other organizations as there were in Libya and Egypt connected to the large (yet a minority) Salafist bloc, which is more the classic al Qaeda, they exist in all countries, they were the ones beating police up in Jordan calling for the release of Sh. Abu Muhammad al Maqdisi along with others.

So again... don't see the basis for this claim.