Uh, yeah you did... here:
If you didn't intend to write that, then maybe you ought to preview your posts prior to posting them, and make them a bit more clear. The fact is that you are promoting a two-day fundraising effort; otherwise why wouldn't you say "
I'm suggesting a 30 million dollar RON PAUL one day goal", instead of a "
a 30 million dollar RON PAUL 15-16th weekend"?
The reason I responded to your post was because we have had hundreds of posts on this exact same subject, attacking the concept of a one-day fundraiser. It's already been decided by consensus. End of story.
I stand by that. We
cannot do both. If you attempt to promote a two-day fundraiser, you're going against everything that the consensus has established here. And that is
exactly what you seem to be promoting, by stating that doing a one-day fundraiser is "limiting" in it's scope. NO, it is not limiting - we might very well raise much more than $10 million in one day, but not if people like you continue to make veiled attempts to attack Trevor's decisions, promoting your own agenda, and diluting the concept of a one-day fundraiser.
You said this, and claim that I'm the one who is "arrogant"? I guess that $4.2 million came from your efforts, whoever the heck you are?! Yeah, right.
Newflash for 'ya, there, buddy-boy - you're just not that important, and neither am I - It's about making a historical one-day fundraising event for our man, Ron Paul.
I say that in love, of course.
.
Connect With Us