If 66% is good, then 88% is better, right? Why not 88%?
What's the amount of additional revenue you want? It's almost like a religious obsession with people wanting to tax the rich these days. Give me numbers, why 66%?
Note alongee is a new member with 7 posts, I suggest he studies up a little more on the Liberty Movement and the role of government in a free society. He needs help with his studies.
Great Northern Railway was able to be built by one private individual in the 1890's without Eminent Domain or government involvement? How was it able to survive the panic of 1893 when all the government-infested ones went into receivership?
They built the highways because they could. There was demand for white flight and suburban sprawl that could not be met without government coercion. They didn't care about taxes because they knew they could work for 30 years and be taken care of for the rest of their lives. The system still worked; as they all do until either their funds get raided or costs get inflated into oblivion or (usually) both. Any social program is only as sustainable as there are funds to maintain it, and the Interstate Highway System is no exception. Eventually it will be privatized or it will crumble.
Citizenship has nothing to do with it.
If you are a human you deserve to be free. Having to pay the government because you get a pay check is enslavement. Enslavement because if you don't pay taxes, you go to jail and become enslaved. It really is that simple.
Taxes do need to exist, but they should only be based on purchases or the spending of money by a persons own free will. Except for necessities to live such as food and other life sustaining items.
You should read Atlas Shrugged and then come back here...
"I am, therefore I'll think" - Ayn Rand