Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: The Media Bomb

  1. #1

    The Media Bomb

    The Media Bomb

    The blackout by the media of Ron Paul is amazing; this however is probably the best thing that could have ever happened to a candidate in a very long time. Considering the amount of coverage, Ron Paul has received in stark contrast to other candidates his polling numbers are incredible. Most notably is the fact that he consistently defeats Obama in the polls.

    In the coming months Ron Paul will need money lots of it to maintain the pace, and with a widespread grassroots media movement this will be hard to maintain. Another aspect is search engines which will be crucial to getting this message out.

    Overcoming the blackout can be done thru a multi-pronged approach, using the central premise of they won't come to you then you need to go to them.

    Lurking a bit I have noticed a well organized approach to maintain a positive counter-output on articles mentioning Ron Paul. What is lacking is a wider spread, in the sense of promoting Ron Paul outside of the small gems here and there provided by the Media. This needs to change in subtle ways and in ways that uses the MSM's own tools to get the message out.

    The Media Bomb is a concentrated 72 hour period over which supports of a cause technically take over the MSM blogs and public opinion communication channels. This is low key and a positive take over, and not to be confused with denial of service or a concerted drowning out of other people's opinions thru negative or even positive spam propaganda.

    Here are the Basics.

    Plan
    1. Register to 3-4 MSM commenting sections:
    2. Concentrate your efforts on the big MSM sites where 90% of the population gets it's news.
    3. Familiarize yourself with the topics, and the general attitude people have toward these topics.

    Prep work
    4. Pick topics you are familiar with and have knowledge of.
    5. Track the topics that have the most hits, and comments.
    6. Do some research on those topics, and familiarize yourself with where source material regarding issues are.

    make friends and have fun
    7. Get in the mix mainly to genuinely agree with other posters, when you see posts or comments that resonate with your own values.
    8. Provide feedback or source materials to issues being discussed, keep it as neutral as possible.
    9. Do not argue or get sucked into any tit for tat argument. Take the high road. you are there to make a positive impression first and foremost.
    --- Helpful
    --- Friendly
    --- Informed
    --- Supportive
    --- Open Minded

    the angle
    9. Do not go on these sites promoting or trying to push the Ron Paul message or try to sell it in anyway shape or form.
    10. Instead of a hard-sell let others come to their own conclusions of the type of persons Ron Paul supporters actually are. How you represent the cause is crucial.
    11. At the bottom of each comment or post you make just add a small non-linked signature "Ron Paul 2012"

    The BOMB
    12. Exponentially increase the amounts of comments and posts you make on these sites. i.e. go from 10 per day to 200 if possible embed a link back to the Ron Paul Campaign Sites
    13. On in 10 posts can include a link to a promo video for Ron Paul, if someone says something just apologize, say you got excited that your candidate was winning, and move on.
    14. Intersperse some of your replies with how Ron is winning, surging ahead, and making a difference.
    15. Comment on how the other candidates are cookie cutter politicians, and change is available if we all make the right choices Go Ron Paul
    16. Point out how Ron Paul is the only Republican who actually has a chance against Obama.
    17. make sure the above is wrapped up in a response to a topic or other comment. Whenever possible agree with someone and help them to see there are other alternatives available to them.
    18. in some case make it a hypothetical, would it not be great if .... and spin it just enough to show the more who support it and go outside of normal convention of doing what the media sells them the more likely their wishes can come true.

    For example:
    I would just laugh if Ron Paul got the nomination in August. The way things are going it may actually end up pulling it off, with a few more peeps willing to stand by their true choice you never know.

    Something similar to the above got 6 likes in under 2 minutes on the Washington Post and just one mild comment on electability, more of an I wish this were possible than a go away type comment.

    These are quick in and out hitters, do not dwell on them or get caught into some philosophical discussion, on the merits of one candidate over another. The objective is to get the Ron Paul name out on as many threads and in front of as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time possible.

    What we need is about 1 - 2 k members to be willing to do this, averaging about 1 million comments, or impressions over a weekend. This can be done once a month. This can be organized with tweeters to tweet the comments as they pop up.

    The other side of this is search engines, and what is needed is an exponential growth in websites linking back to the Ron Paul Campaign site. Free websites, blogs, YouTube channels, carrying stories that represent Ron Paul values and or stories. This is where we can capitalize on the crowds gathering at the Ron Paul event. We need to get those who attend those events add a link or Ron Paul 2012 to their online signatures. Spend 10 minutes a day linking back Ron Paul stories on their various internet channels, forums blogs tweets it creates an overwhelming presence. Get a commitment from those attendees to do their part to promote the campaign thru their everyday online activity. Get some to commit to maintain blogs. Get those attendees to go outside of their normal channels to find place where they can put Ron Paul’s name and candidacy in front of people who may not be aware they still have a choice. They may not have money to donate, but time spent, and positive word of mouth from run of the mill people is worth a fortune in advertising.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Headlines

    AP (Yahoo!)
    CNN
    McClatchy
    Reuters
    Yahoo! News

    Best Political Coverage

    ABC News
    CNN
    C-SPAN
    NPR
    NY Times
    Salon.com
    Slate
    Washington Post
    Politico

    Legislative News

    Congressional Quarterly
    C-SPAN
    The Hill
    Roll Call
    Stateline.org
    Washington Post

    The Politics Section

    Boston Globe
    Dallas News
    Denver Post
    Los Angeles Times
    Minneapolis Star Tribune
    Seattle Times
    NY Times
    Washington Post
    Washington Times
    USA Today

    Magazines

    American Spectator
    The Atlantic Monthly
    Foreign Affairs
    Mother Jones
    The Nation
    National Review
    Newsweek
    The New Republic
    Time
    U.S. News & World Report
    Utne Reader
    Washington Monthly
    The Weekly Standard
    World Press Review

    Television

    ABC News
    CBS News
    CNN Politics
    C-SPAN
    Fox News
    MSNBC
    PBS

    Programs

    The Beltway Boys
    Face the Nation
    Fox News Sunday
    Frontline
    Hannity and Colmes
    Hardball with Chris Matthews
    Larry King Live
    Late Edition
    The McLaughlin Group
    Meet the Press
    The NewsHour
    Nightline
    On the Record
    The O'Reilly Factor
    Reliable Sources
    Shields and Brooks
    The Situation Room
    This Week
    Washington Journal
    Washington Week

    Online

    Alternative Press Index
    Capitol Hill Blue
    CommonDreams.org
    Drudge Report
    Political Insider
    Political Wire
    PopPolitics
    Salon.com
    Slate
    Stateline.org
    TomPaine.com

    Radio

    ABC NewsRadio
    NPR
    USA Radio Network

    Political Cartoons

    Clay Bennett
    CNN: 'Toons and Analysis
    Doonesbury
    Tom Meyer
    PoliticalCartoons.com
    Ted Rall
    Michael Ramirez
    Sage, Ink
    Slate CartoonBox

    Columnists

    Alex Beam (Boston Globe)
    Richard Benedetto (USA Today)
    Rick Brand (Newsday)
    David S. Broder (Washington Post)
    William F. Buckley Jr. (National Review)
    Peter Canellos (Boston Globe)
    Steve Chapman (Chicago Tribune)
    Richard Cohen (Washington Post)
    Gail Collins (NY Times)
    Joe Conason (NY Observer)
    Charlie Cook (National Journal)
    Maureen Dowd (NY Times)
    Thomas Friedman (NY Times)
    Ellen Goodman (Boston Globe)
    Nat Hentoff (Jewish World Review)
    Arianna Huffington (Syndicated)
    Molly Ivins (Fort Worth Star-Telegram)
    Al Kamen (Washington Post)
    Mickey Kaus (Slate)
    Michael Kelly (Washington Post)
    Joe Klein (Time)
    Morton M. Kondracke (Roll Call)
    Charles Krauthammer (Washington Post)
    Howard Kurtz (Washington Post)
    Julie Mason (Houston Chronicle)
    Mary McGrory (Washington Post)
    Mary Mitchell (Chicago Sun-Times)
    Peggy Noonan (Wall Street Journal)
    Clarence Page (Chicago Tribune)
    Camille Paglia (Salon.com)
    Chuck Raasch (USA Today)
    William Raspberry (Washington Post)
    William Safire (NY Times)
    Robert J. Samuelson (Washington Post)
    Mark Shields (Creators Syndicate)
    Thomas Sowell (Jewish World Review)
    Andrew Sullivan (andrewsullivan.com)
    John O'Sullivan (Chicago Sun-Times)
    George F. Will (Washington Post)

    Opinion/Editorials

    Arizona Republic
    Arkansas Democrat-Gazette
    Baton Rouge Advocate
    Boston Globe
    Charlotte Observer
    Chicago Sun-Times
    Chicago Tribune
    Christian Science Monitor
    Cleveland Plain Dealer
    The State (Columbia, S.C.)
    Dallas Morning News
    Denver Post
    Detroit News
    Fort Worth Star-Telegram
    Houston Chronicle
    Idaho Press-Tribune
    Kansas City Star
    LA Times
    Miami Herald
    Milwaukee Journal Sentinal
    Minneapolis Star-Tribune
    New York Post
    Newsday
    NY Times
    The Oklahoman
    Orange County Register
    Raleigh News & Observer
    Richmond Times-Dispatch
    Sacramento Bee
    Salt Lake City Deseret News
    San Jose Mercury News
    Seattle Times
    St. Louis Post-Dispatch
    Minneapolis/St. Paul Pioneer Press
    USA Today
    Wall Street Journal
    Washington Post
    Washington Times

    International

    Christian Science Monitor (USA)
    The Economist
    The Globe and Mail (Canada)
    The Guardian Unlimited (UK)
    International Herald Tribune
    Japan Times
    The Korea Herald (South Korea)
    The Times (London)
    The Moscow Times
    Times of India

    News Source Links

    Kidon
    NewsClusters
    SourceWatch Conservative
    SourceWatch Liberal
    USNPL
    Online Newspapers by State

    Major News Twitter Feeds

    ABC News
    CBS News
    CNN
    Examiner.com
    FOX News
    Gallup
    Huffington Post
    Los Angeles Times
    msnbc.com
    New York Times
    Newsweek
    Politico
    Reuters
    The Associated Press
    Time
    U.S. News & World Report
    UPI.com
    USA Today
    Washington Post



Similar Threads

  1. What do you think?! Media Bomb?
    By constitutionalism in forum Ron Paul Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-24-2011, 09:59 PM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-01-2008, 12:03 PM
  3. Dec 17th - Media Bomb
    By stoutmaker in forum December 31st Donations Planning
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-17-2007, 10:01 PM
  4. Dec 17 - MEDIA BOMB!
    By stoutmaker in forum Tea Party
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-17-2007, 08:40 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •