Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 63

Thread: Kucinich And Stephen Zarlenga Anti-Gold Drive

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default Kucinich And Stephen Zarlenga Anti-Gold Drive



    The LAND Of Israel Forever

    The armed man asks 'Why?'.The unarmed man says 'Yes!'.



  • #2

  • #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cubical View Post
    Quite long... cliffs?
    This.

  • #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cubical View Post
    Quite long... cliffs?
    If you read Zarlenga's book (the first 3/4 is highly recommended, the last 1/4 not so much), he makes a strong case that the total supply of gold is too small relative to the total economy, making it too easy for a small number of very wealthy people to gain control of enough gold to manipulate prices, interest rates, the directions of markets, etc. for their own profit, and to the detriment not only of other market players but the broader economy.

  • #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roy L View Post
    If you read Zarlenga's book (the first 3/4 is highly recommended, the last 1/4 not so much), he makes a strong case that the total supply of gold is too small relative to the total economy, making it too easy for a small number of very wealthy people to gain control of enough gold to manipulate prices, interest rates, the directions of markets, etc. for their own profit, and to the detriment not only of other market players but the broader economy.
    This might make sense if the price of gold was static. As some major player tries to hoard the gold, it will skyrocket in value beyond its "true" value. The powers who try to buy up all the gold will in essence be selling off other at assets dirt cheap prices. When someone is hoarding money, it is good for everyone else, assuming he gets the money in an honest way(ie selling a product rather than theft or counterfeit).

  • #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cubical View Post
    This might make sense if the price of gold was static.
    No, it makes sense because it isn't.
    As some major player tries to hoard the gold, it will skyrocket in value beyond its "true" value. The powers who try to buy up all the gold will in essence be selling off other at assets dirt cheap prices.
    Nope. Buy on margin, kite the price, sell at a profit. You seem to have a remarkably naive view of how financial markets work.
    When someone is hoarding money, it is good for everyone else, assuming he gets the money in an honest way(ie selling a product rather than theft or counterfeit).
    Nope. Deflation is NOT good for everyone else.

  • #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Washtenaw Co., MI
    Posts
    3,098

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roy L View Post
    No, it makes sense because it isn't.

    Nope. Buy on margin, kite the price, sell at a profit. You seem to have a remarkably naive view of how financial markets work.

    Nope. Deflation is NOT good for everyone else.
    Great arguments. I really see where cubical was wrong, and why you must be right.

    I hope you enlighten us more with your impeccable reasoning and analysis.
    "You cannot solve these problems with war." - Ron Paul

  • #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roy L View Post
    No, it makes sense because it isn't.

    Nope. Buy on margin, kite the price, sell at a profit. You seem to have a remarkably naive view of how financial markets work.

    Nope. Deflation is NOT good for everyone else.
    How would it make sense? As gold moves higher, the buyer(manipulator if you want to call him that) will have to give up more and more assets to keep finding new sellers.

    If you are the only major buyer, you can't prop up the price, certainly not long enough to unload your position. Besides, you could attempt this with any asset, not just gold. It really has nothing to do with gold.

    Wrong. Let's say Steve Jobs had become so rich that he owned 50% of the money in the United States. Then right before he passed away he said he was burning all his cash. You really believe this would not increase the purchasing power, thus be good, for EVERYONE else who held dollars?

  • #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roy L View Post
    No, it makes sense because it isn't.

    Nope. Buy on margin, kite the price, sell at a profit. You seem to have a remarkably naive view of how financial markets work.

    Nope. Deflation is NOT good for everyone else.
    Unless someone is pointing a gun at a group, free market will intervene and a new medium and commodity for exchanging goods will be sought and agreed upon VOLUNTARILY.
    Sign up, Log in:
    http://forums.officer.com/
    Surviving
    http://www.themodernsurvivalist.com/

    • Fiat Banking - Your supply of capital is limited to whatever arbitrary limit those who have limitless currency resources allow.
    • There is no 'law' - Only psychopaths who pervert just principals for their own enrichment while violently stealing your wealth, your future, and your life if need be.

  • #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roy L View Post
    If you read Zarlenga's book (the first 3/4 is highly recommended, the last 1/4 not so much), he makes a strong case that the total supply of gold is too small relative to the total economy, making it too easy for a small number of very wealthy people to gain control of enough gold to manipulate prices, interest rates, the directions of markets, etc. for their own profit, and to the detriment not only of other market players but the broader economy.
    Question...

    How is everything you just said in the above paragraph not all ready what we have under the fiat/central bank system?

  • Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •