So, how does one combat the emotional argument that the government has to "come to the peoples' rescue" whenever hard times or a crisis screws over a lot of people at once?
As much as I want to say that charitable organizations would fill this void, the reality is that even now churches and charitable organizations are falling down on the job when it comes to 100% coverage. If people thought they could reliably go to these places for help for things like disability or unemployment contingencies, they wouldn't be arguing for government assistance.
So how does one argue against these things without looking like you don't care? How do you get people to accept a free market when the free market screws them over every once in a while?
Again, I'm not just looking for a logical argument here. I'm looking for an effective argument that appeals to the heart as well.
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us