Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: US Blocks Investigation into Army’s Massacre in Kandahar

  1. #1
    Member John F Kennedy III's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Mesa, AZ (FEMA Region IX)
    Posts
    10,743

    Default US Blocks Investigation into Army’s Massacre in Kandahar

    US Blocks Investigation into Army’s Massacre in Kandahar

    RT
    March 31, 2012

    The defense lawyer for Robert Bales, who is accused of killing 17 Afghan civilians, is blaming the US for blocking his team’s fact-finding mission into the Kandahar incident. He says he can’t interview witnesses and prosecutors won’t cooperate.

    John Henry Browne claims US forces in Afghanistan obstructed him and his associates from reaching the injured civilians at a hospital in Kandahar province to interview them about the incident, Reuters reports.

    Brown also said that after investigators interviewed the injured, they let them go freely with collecting any contact information, making it virtually impossible to find them. He further charges they are not sharing the data which was obtained from the witnesses with his team. He says Bales’ defense has only managed to talk to US soldiers in Afghanistan, but not the actual victims of the attack.

    Browne explains that the military prosecutors who filed the charges against Bales have been possibly been unwilling to cooperate because “they are concerned about the strength of their case.”

    The lawyer complained of an “almost complete information blackout from the government, which is having a devastating effect on our ability to investigate the charges preferred against our client.”

    Browne’s statements raise even more suspicion about whether the US really wants to punish the guilty party to the fullest extent of the law, or if the government is concealing some ugly truth about the Kandahar massacre.

    An independent Afghan probe into the killings alleges that up to 20 US soldiers were involved. After analyzing reports from witnesses and survivors, an investigative team sent by President Hamid Karzai firmly stated that “one soldier cannot kill so many people in two villages within one hour at the same time.”These suspicions are shared by President Hamid Karzai, who also said that the delegation “did not receive cooperation from the USA regarding the surrender of the US soldiers to the Afghan government.”

    In response to the incident, Karzai demanded a full withdrawal of coalition troops from Afghan settlements, further ordering that they be confined to military bases.

    US officials still insist that only one soldier was involved in the shootings. They showed their Afghan counterparts images captured by a surveillance camera on a blimp above the base, which allegedly shows Bales returning after the shooting. But the investigators, for some reason, withheld the surveillance video from Bales’ lawyer.

    Robert Bales was originally held in military custody following the incident, only to be hastily evacuated from Afghanistan. The suspected homicidal soldier’s identity was revealed only after he was reported to be en route to a military prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.

    For the time being, Bales will have his psychological condition examined. Officials also say that due to security concerns, Bales is likely to remain at the Fort Leavenworth, and will not be transferred to the Walter Reed Army Medical Center outside Washington, DC. The psychological exam, officially called “board 706,” is par for the course when it comes to such instances of mass murder.


    article here:
    http://www.infowars.com/us-block-inv...e-in-kandahar/

    originally here:
    http://rt.com/news/afghan-us-lawyer-bales-907/



  • #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Land of Indians
    Posts
    16,982

    Default

    It does make things look suspicious .

  • #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Land of Indians
    Posts
    16,982

    Default

    The Afghanis picked up shell casings , where are they now ?

  • #4

  • #5
    Member John F Kennedy III's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Mesa, AZ (FEMA Region IX)
    Posts
    10,743

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Noblegeorge View Post
    Such a cover up.
    Indeed.

  • #6
    Ahab Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    In a Nine Line Bind
    Posts
    43,874
    Blog Entries
    12

    Default

    So, let's run this down:

    A man trained by a foreign nation in deadly combat skills carries out a terror attack on another nation's soil.

    Said training nation then gives him safe harbor.

    Said training nation then refuses to turn him over to the nation where he carried out the attacks for trial and possible punishment.

    So, by our own logic, the Afghan government would be justified in laying waste to the East Coast of the United States?

  • #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    So, let's run this down:

    A man trained by a foreign nation in deadly combat skills carries out a terror attack on another nation's soil.

    Said training nation then gives him safe harbor.

    Said training nation then refuses to turn him over to the nation where he carried out the attacks for trial and possible punishment.

    So, by our own logic, the Afghan government would be justified in laying waste to the East Coast of the United States?
    I can only hope that when the chickens come home to roost they target appropriately.

    The thing that frequently amazes me the most about this "war on terror" is that there aren't more "terrorist attacks," considering that we're supposed to believe that Muslims are subhuman barbarians who always want to kill. Maybe they're distracted by oppressing women or something.
    Well, I got Rand started on his campaign (just search around here to see). I advised Thomas Massie before he ran for Congress. I am currently advising 2 liberty campaigns for the state legislature. I ran the war-room and won Minnesota for Ron Paul a few weeks back. There are other things I'm probably forgetting.
    Yet I can't afford $200 to go to a seminar--Matt Collins

  • #8

    Default

    That does not look good.

    Notorious neocon plant's war policy or rather that of his Israeli lobby masters has been a royal failure, they probably wanted to keep bases near Iran's border ready for as long as possible just in case their Iran war itch got scratched by their plant.

    On a different note, I don't believe ICC can technically try nobel peace prize winners for war crimes but won't be too surprised if courts in some country did.

  • #9

    Default

    So why isn't Soetoro calling for the heads of the military personnel that conducted the shoddy investigation, and the individuals who are also currently not cooperating? Could it be that Soetoro is simply a puppet who answers to higher powers?

  • #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moderate libertarian View Post
    On a different note, I don't believe ICC can technically try nobel peace prize winners for war crimes
    Really? You mean Nobel Peace Prize winners have carte blanche to commit mass murder? As long as they use military personnel? Interesting.

  • Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •