Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 44 of 44

Thread: how many are aware of UN agenda 21?

  1. #31

    Default

    Im so sick of this shit. Seriously how much money does a person need? How much power? Why can't they just let people live free? Would it be so bad? I live my life, I make my decisions, i reap the rewards of feel the consequences. I don't aggress against you, you don't aggress against me and every friday we smoke fatties in the park... What would be so wrong with that? Oh, is the population approaching unsustainable levels? How could we know when we still pay farmers not to farm? Ron Paul for Sainthood. Peace.
    I yearned for a reason, I sought and I fought only to realize that there are no reasons but the ones we choose.
    As in all things, choose wisely. You are, after all, the aggregate of your choices.

    Choose your reason, become you're reason

    Semper Fi



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #32
    Member evadmurd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    East TN
    Posts
    1,493
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by onlyrp View Post
    it gives conspiracy theorists a boogey man to scare people about government, environmentalism, conservation.
    What kind of BS statement was that?
    Don't try to win over
    THE HATERS
    You are not the
    JERK WHISPERER

    "Truth is treason in the empire of lies." -- Ron Paul

  4. #33

    Default

    Thank you so much for starting this thread. This agenda is huge and basically means world takeover in the name of conserving regions of the environment. It was started in '92 and led by Pres Bush. It is implemented locally by the ICLEI which works with hundreds of local environmental and parks depts, many of whom are unaware of the larger picture they are taking part in. The UN already owns 12% of the worlds land, including parts of the US, esp in Washington and Oregon states. Eventually, and likely sooner than we think as they are almost prepared to move into the next phase after their G-20 meeting and the earth summit which follows shortly thereafter, people will be relocated to human corridors within their respective nation. They will be 'stacked and packed' in tiny apartments to save most of the land for conservation and animal restoration. All of which is BS. They just want to own the world. The UN has been a socialist and communist front from the beginning. Alger Hiss, the convicted Soviet Spy, lost his position as the first UN Secretary-General when his espionage was discovered. He also helped to represent the US at the San Francisco convention forming the UN in 45 and he admitted to Congress that he took part in the actual writing of the UN Charter as the US representative. And, yes, they do want you dead. Depopulation is an implied ingredient in all of this. You can happily read Agenda 21 online and all of its environmental and social injustice propaganda. It is a couple of hundred pages long, not bad. The real scary stuff is in the 3,000 page implementation manual.
    There are many videos on youtube about this. Please look it up and help Ron Paul get us out of the UN.

  5. #34

    Default

    Agenda 21 is the conspiracy theory behind all conspiracy theories. the problem is is that it is not a theory. it is established fact and UN policy ready for everyone to read and study on the Internet. That is what makes it so scary. they are doing it right in front of everyone's face. David Rockefeller is behind much of this agenda and he was instrumental, through the Rockefeller Foundation, in funding the establishment of the UN back in the 40s.

    "Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure---one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

    --David Rockefeller, Memoirs, page 405

    "Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history."

    ---David Rockefeller, statement about Mao Tse-tung in The New York Times, August 10, 1973

  6. #35

    Default

    http://www.infowars.com/un-backed-sc...lation-lockup/

    UN-Backed Scientist Calls for Mega-City Population Lockup
    Last edited by marcirvine; 04-02-2012 at 09:22 AM.

  7. #36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by marcirvine View Post
    Thank you so much for starting this thread. This agenda is huge and basically means world takeover in the name of conserving regions of the environment. It was started in '92 and led by Pres Bush.
    Actually, it was started much earlier than that. This is just the latest installment.

    This has been ongoing for over 100 years,, and was promoted by Fabian Socialists at the turn of the last century.
    Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
    Ron Paul 2004

    Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
    It's all about Freedom

  8. #37
    Member Zippyjuan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Hosting FEMA Party
    Posts
    18,566

    Default

    What were the other 20 previous agendas? Just curious.
    Last edited by Zippyjuan; 04-04-2012 at 04:32 PM.
    I am Zippy and I approve of this message. But you don't have to.

  9. #38
    Member Zippyjuan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Hosting FEMA Party
    Posts
    18,566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by marcirvine View Post
    http://www.infowars.com/un-backed-sc...lation-lockup/

    UN-Backed Scientist Calls for Mega-City Population Lockup

    An excellent example of Alex Jones taking a story and giving it a fear- mongering spin. If one reads the actual report, it says that it might be benificial in terms of resource usage to construct cities with greater densities rather than spreading them out over larger areas. The headline, which features the phrase "Population Lockup" gives the scary impression of giant walled cities surrounded by police and/ or military to keep people from being able to go in and out of them- a massive prison or gulag- which is not at all what the piece even suggests. More skyscrapers are not gulags although it would be technically possible to use them in that way.
    I am Zippy and I approve of this message. But you don't have to.

  10. #39

    Default

    Zippy, you are an asset, I like the fact you put government studies up. But, damn. The government is not going to admit wrong doing. Never. And independent studies are worth more than the "official" studies given the propensity of government lies. Especially when said studies are funded by the same industries in question. If you don't think washington is out of control just say so. I deliberately left washington in low caps, they no longer represent any american.
    “The state can't give you freedom, and the state can't take it away. You're born with it, like your eyes, like your ears. Freedom is something you assume, then you wait for someone to try to take it away. The degree to which you resist is the degree to which you are free.” ~ Utah Phillips

  11. #40
    Member donnay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Live Free or Die Trying!
    Posts
    17,794
    Blog Entries
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    An excellent example of Alex Jones taking a story and giving it a fear- mongering spin. If one reads the actual report, it says that it might be benificial in terms of resource usage to construct cities with greater densities rather than spreading them out over larger areas. The headline, which features the phrase "Population Lockup" gives the scary impression of giant walled cities surrounded by police and/ or military to keep people from being able to go in and out of them- a massive prison or gulag- which is not at all what the piece even suggests. More skyscrapers are not gulags although it would be technically possible to use them in that way.
    It got your attention didn't it?
    "Logic is an enemy and truth is a menace." ~ Rod Serling

    "Cops today are nothing but an armed tax collector" ~ Frank Serpico

    "To be normal, to drink Coca-Cola and eat Kentucky Fried Chicken is to be in a conspiracy against yourself."

    "People that don't want to make waves sit in stagnant waters. "

  12. #41
    Member Zippyjuan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Hosting FEMA Party
    Posts
    18,566

    Default

    It is fine for entertainment value- for a source of facts about what is going on the world it is terrible.
    From the Infowars piece:
    Insisting the world’s population be locked up within the confounds of mega-cities, the elite realizes that if the herd is to be properly controlled walls are needed- thick walls, and by constructing these walls, making the masses go this or that way will be made easier..
    People who know anything about history know that the creation of mega-cities in which the masses may be rounded up and enclosed, is identical to the Nazi principle of the “ghetto” as a means of managing the masses. Every student of history may also know what happens to those masses shortly after.
    There were no walled cities even suggested.

    From the article linked to in the InfoWar piece:
    Fragkias told msnbc.com that "the answer [to urban sprawl] is denser cities."

    "The main message is we are not going to get away with cities like Phoenix or cities like Los Angeles," he said. "These are the typical cities of the single-family house, with a huge lot and huge highways that connect various areas of the cities because there is no way you can have an efficient or cheap enough mass transit system to support them."

    Instead, densely populated areas such as Singapore or Manhattan -- but not New York City's surrounding urban sprawl -- provided possible models for the future. "If cities can develop in height rather than in width that would be much more preferable and environmentally not as harmful," Fragkias said.
    Everything from Infowars is presented as part of some big plan to control the world and either lock up or kill everybody. Do they actually run any positive articles?
    I am Zippy and I approve of this message. But you don't have to.

  13. #42
    Member John F Kennedy III's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Merced, CA (FEMA Region IX)
    Posts
    11,117

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PatriotOne View Post
    I could have added "and they want you to pay for your death" and "they want to profit from your death" also but was afraid Lishy didn't have time for all that. Pretty much sums up most of the globalists covert depopulation programs eh?
    Yes it does.

  14. #43

    Default

    I agree with their goals, not their means.

    Libertarianism is the way to achieve depopulation, historically, the more authoritarian the government, the denser the population, and vice versa.

    High population density, mass agriculture and big government are the trifecta of plagues upon humankind. They all feed upon each other and grow together.

  15. #44

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    An excellent example of Alex Jones taking a story and giving it a fear- mongering spin. If one reads the actual report, it says that it might be benificial in terms of resource usage to construct cities with greater densities rather than spreading them out over larger areas. The headline, which features the phrase "Population Lockup" gives the scary impression of giant walled cities surrounded by police and/ or military to keep people from being able to go in and out of them- a massive prison or gulag- which is not at all what the piece even suggests. More skyscrapers are not gulags although it would be technically possible to use them in that way.
    If you look into the Agenda 21 yourself you will find that the cities will be 'walled' The UN itself calls the places where humans will live 'human corridors.' That is from the UN site itself, not Alex Jones. Interstate and international travel will be allowed only for the highest elite. Look at the UN site itself if you dont want to take the conspiracy theorists word for it. It is all out in the open.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12




« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •