Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: The North American Leaders Summit and Reviving Trilateral Integration

  1. #1

    Default The North American Leaders Summit and Reviving Trilateral Integration

    With the demise of the Security and Prosperity Partnership, the U.S. has essentially put Canada and Mexico on separate tracks. It has pursued dual-bilateralism with both its NAFTA partners as the primary means of advancing continental integration with regards to trade, regulatory and security initiatives. The upcoming North American Leaders Summit, which will be held in Washington, D.C. on April 2, could be used as a means of reviving the trilateral cooperation model.

    While much of my focus has been on the U.S.-Canada Beyond the Border and the Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) action plans, the U.S. is also pursuing a similar agenda with Mexico. This includes working towards a common security perimeter. In 2010, the U.S. and Mexico issued the Twenty-First Century Border Management declaration. This established the Executive Steering Committee (ESC) to implement joint border related projects to enhance economic prosperity and security. In December of last year, the ESC adopted its 2012 action plan which sets goals in areas of binational infrastructure coordination, risk management, law enforcement cooperation, along with improving cross-border commerce and ties. A press release explained that through the ESC, “we are developing and managing our shared border in an integrated fashion to facilitate the secure, efficient, and rapid flows of goods and people and reduce the costs of doing business between our two countries.” The ESC meeting also acknowledged bilateral accomplishments in expanding the use of trusted traveler initiatives such as the Global Entry Program.

    In May of 2010, U.S. President Barack Obama and Mexican President Felipe Calderon directed the creation of the High-Level Regulatory Cooperation Council (HLRCC). In February of this year, the HLRCC released a work plan whereby the U.S. and Mexico will seek greater regulatory alignment in the areas of food, transportation, nanotechnology, e-health, as well as oil and gas development standards. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce applauded the plan for enhanced regulatory cooperation between both countries. The terms of reference for the HLRCC also recognized that, “some regulatory challenges require trilateral cooperation among the three Parties to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the United States and Mexico intend to involve the Government of Canada when it is necessary to focus on issues of common interest in North America.” The U.S.-Mexico HLRCC has similar goals to the U.S.-Canada RCC. At some point, these dual-bilateral councils could come together to form a single continental regulatory regime.

    read full article http://beyourownleader.blogspot.ca/2...ummit-and.html



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2

    Default

    The SPP didn't die. It's name just changed.
    ================
    Gary Johnson supports the Trans Pacific Partnership. That makes him a traitor.

    The Property Basis of Rights

  4. #3

    Default

    I don't understand the push for a North American Union since we already have a North American Union. It's known as the United States. If other regions wish to join us, they will have to adapt to our Constitution and get approved by the government. Personally I would probably only take Alberta and British Colombia at the moment. No thanks to Mexico and the leftist parts of Canada.






Similar Threads

  1. The North American Leaders Summit and Reviving Trilateral Integration
    By John F Kennedy III in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-27-2012, 05:14 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-11-2009, 02:15 PM
  3. Leaders’ Summit on North American Relations Held in June
    By killthefed in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-27-2009, 08:15 PM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-06-2008, 04:06 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-06-2008, 12:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •