This issue has got people pissed off right now! With all this stuff in the news about insurance, abortion, birth control, and women's health care, can someone help me formulate a good, reasonably complete, explanation of how Ron Paul is not "at war against women"? Something that would really differentiate him from those who are the worst offenders in the "war". Obviously I don't believe Dr. Paul is trying to hurt women's rights, and put women back in the kitchen, barefoot, but I don't know how to clearly articulate why I have such trust.
For example, the "honest rape" comment really hurt us, but it was (perhaps willfully) taken way out of context. The rape argument for abortion is a big straw man in my opinion, since it accounts for a relatively small percentage of abortions. But it is effectively used to make opponents look insensitive.