Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 41

Thread: No Corporate Tax: How to fund Defense?

  1. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by virgil47 View Post
    In the same way the founders proposed ... by using tariffs on foreign goods. The tariffs would not have to be very large and would have the added advantage of encouraging U.S. businesses to bring their manufacturing bases back to the U.S. where the lack of corporate tax coupled with the tariff on goods entering the U.S. would increase their profits and increase the manufacturing base at home. Before anyone cries "protectionism" please realize that in order to maintain our standard of living and maintain a strong national defense it is imperative that our manufacturing base be rebuilt.
    This.
    Quiz: Test Your "Income" Tax IQ!

    "No man escapes when freedom fails; The best men rot in filthy jails. And those that cried 'Appease! Appease!' Are hanged by those they tried to please." Author Unknown



  • #12
    Member Zippyjuan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Hosting FEMA Party
    Posts
    14,987

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by virgil47 View Post
    Tariffs are taxes on foreign entities. While they would temporarily raise the cost of goods in the U.S. they would also foster the reemergence of local manufacturing which would of course be tariff free. As local manufacturing reemerges the price of goods would drop. By simply bringing the military back home our government could save billions. Bringing the military back home would save billions more by cutting the manufacturers of war material out of the economy. The removal of 5 or more federal agencies would put us on the road to a balanced budget in short order. Under the scenario I have lain out Medicare and Social Security would not have to be cut although they would indeed need to be phased out in a controlled manner over a period of years.
    Those "foreign entities" add the tax onto the price of goods. US manufactures would lose a lot of competition from foreign goods and would be freer to raise their prices. Then if we have a high tarrif on their goods, the other country responds by rasing tarrifs on goods they buy from us- meaning we lose jobs for exporters. Another effect is that as the tariffs are added, the demand for and value of imported goods fall which means you need even higher tariffs to obtain the same level of revenues you were counting on.

    http://www.investopedia.com/articles...#axzz1nYu2WRUT
    Tariffs increase the prices of imported goods. Because of this, domestic producers are not forced to reduce their prices from increased competition, and domestic consumers are left paying higher prices as a result. Tariffs also reduce efficiencies by allowing companies that would not exist in a more competitive market to remain open.



    Read more: http://www.investopedia.com/articles...#ixzz1nYuTFovd
    It may seem like you are getting government spending free- paid for by foreigners, but that is not the case- they will be in the prices of things you purchase. The taxes are simply better hidden and you are paying them more discretely. No free ride.
    Last edited by Zippyjuan; 02-26-2012 at 11:50 PM.
    Freedom is a state of mind. Nobody can take that from you unless you let them.

  • #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Land of Indians
    Posts
    17,071

    Default

    You could fund the allowable spending under Article One , Section Eight easily and give Americans a tax break and still chip away at the debt , and put everthing else back where it belongs , with the states , the people , private charities and tip jars.
    Last edited by oyarde; 02-28-2012 at 10:04 AM.

  • #14
    Member osan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Right here
    Posts
    5,510
    Blog Entries
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    That means you need to cut $1.3 trillion or so from this portion of the budget:

    Discretionary spending: $1.378 trillion (+13.8%)

    $663.7 billion (+12.7%) – Department of Defense (including Overseas Contingency Operations)

    Should be able to cut at least 71% of this by ending the wars, refraining from getting into any others where we are not directly attacked militarily by a regular army, closing the several extraneous overseas military bases, clipping CIA/NSA charters limiting them to very specific duties and placing them under a very strict managerial microscope meaning no more operations beyond that of strictly passive observation; all other actions to be undertaken by military only. These along should take a large bite out of the big fat military butt.

    We could reduce active and career military forces, replacing them with updated nuclear arms and a very simple policy that includes withdrawal from all international treaties, strictly defensive positions (non-interventionism), and the clear message that any nation which attacks us militarily will be turned into a vitrified, glow in the dark wasteland that will remain uninhabitable for the next several hundreds of thousands of years, not a solitary soul whether man woman or child to be spared.

    Augment that policy with ones drawing heavy manufacturing back to our shores which, once secured we develop steep ramp contingency planning for the rapid conversion of manufacturing resources for wartime production just in case we decide not to nuke someone but must repel an invading army (yeah right).

    $78.7 billion (−1.7%) – Department of Health and Human Services
    Gone. $78.7 down...

    $
    72.5 billion (+2.8%) – Department of Transportation
    Gone. $151.2 down...

    $52.5 billion (+10.3%) – Department of Veterans Affairs
    Gone. $203.7 down...

    $51.7 billion (+40.9%) – Department of State and Other International Programs
    Gone. $255.4 down...

    $47.5 billion (+18.5%) – Department of Housing and Urban Development
    Gone. $302.9 down...

    $46.7 billion (+12.8%) – Department of Education
    Gone. $349.6 down...

    $42.7 billion (+1.2%) – Department of Homeland Security
    Gone. $392.3 down...

    $26.3 billion (−0.4%) – Department of Energy
    Gone. $418.6 down...

    $26.0 billion (+8.8%) – Department of Agriculture
    Gone. $444.6 down...

    $23.9 billion (−6.3%) – Department of Justice
    Gone. $468.5 down...

    $18.7 billion (+5.1%) – National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    Gone. $487.2 down...

    $13.8 billion (+48.4%) – Department of Commerce
    Gone. $501 down...

    $13.3 billion (+4.7%) – Department of Labor
    Gone. $514.3 down...

    $13.3 billion (+4.7%) – Department of the Treasury
    Might keep this one, though they would have to prove themselves worth their keep.

    $12.0 billion (+6.2%) – Department of the Interior
    Gone. $526 down...

    $10.5 billion (+34.6%) – Environmental Protection Agency
    Might keep this one, but only to observe and report. ZERO executive power. Let us say we cut them by 71% (7.5 billion)

    $533.5 down...

    $9.7 billion (+10.2%) – Social Security Administration
    Gone. $540.5 down...

    $7.0 billion (+1.4%) – National Science Foundation
    Gone. $547.5 down...

    $5.1 billion (−3.8%) – Corps of Engineers
    Gone. $552.6 down...

    $5.0 billion (+100%-NA) – National Infrastructure Bank
    Gone. $557.6 down...

    $1.1 billion (+22.2%) – Corporation for National and Community Service
    Gone. $558.7 down...

    $0.7 billion (0.0%) – Small Business Administration
    Gone. $559.8 down...

    $0.6 billion (−14.3%) – General Services Administration
    Gone. $560.4 down...

    $0 billion (−100%-NA) – Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)
    Gone. $560.4 down...

    $0 billion (−100%-NA) – Financial stabilization efforts
    Gone. $560.4 down...

    $11 billion (+275%-NA) – Potential disaster costs
    Gone. $571.4 down...

    $19.8 billion (+3.7%) – Other Agencies
    Gone. $591.2 billion

    $591.2 plus $471.23 (defense) == approx. 1.063 trillion dollars cut.

    Not so difficult, actually. Trim the fat, restore the business environment and it is almost miraculous to observe how a nation returns to economic health.

    I say put the bulk of it to the torch and those in our way to the sword.

    Have a nice day.
    --

    http://freedomisobvious.blogspot.com
    http://turnyourbackonthem.wordpress.com

    ignominia et contemptum tyrannis

    Habeo excelsum artem; afflixerim cum crudelitate illis qui laedas me

    The affairs of gold-laden Gyges do not interest me.
    Zealousy of the gods has never seized me nor anger
    at their deeds. But I have no love for great tyranny
    for its deeds are very far from my eyes. -Archilochus

  • #15
    Member osan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Right here
    Posts
    5,510
    Blog Entries
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    That means you need to cut $1.3 trillion or so from this portion of the budget:

    Discretionary spending: $1.378 trillion (+13.8%)

    $663.7 billion (+12.7%) – Department of Defense (including Overseas Contingency Operations)

    Should be able to cut at least 71% of this by ending the wars, refraining from getting into any others where we are not directly attacked militarily by a regular army, closing the several extraneous overseas military bases, clipping CIA/NSA charters limiting them to very specific duties and placing them under a very strict managerial microscope meaning no more operations beyond that of strictly passive observation; all other actions to be undertaken by military only. These along should take a large bite out of the big fat military butt.

    We could reduce active and career military forces, replacing them with updated nuclear arms and a very simple policy that includes withdrawal from all international treaties, strictly defensive positions (non-interventionism), and the clear message that any nation which attacks us militarily will be turned into a vitrified, glow in the dark wasteland that will remain uninhabitable for the next several hundreds of thousands of years, not a solitary soul whether man woman or child to be spared.

    Augment that policy with ones drawing heavy manufacturing back to our shores which, once secured we develop steep ramp contingency planning for the rapid conversion of manufacturing resources for wartime production just in case we decide not to nuke someone but must repel an invading army (yeah right).

    $78.7 billion (−1.7%) – Department of Health and Human Services
    Gone. $78.7 down...

    $
    72.5 billion (+2.8%) – Department of Transportation
    Gone. $151.2 down...

    $52.5 billion (+10.3%) – Department of Veterans Affairs
    Gone. $203.7 down...

    $51.7 billion (+40.9%) – Department of State and Other International Programs
    Gone. $255.4 down...

    $47.5 billion (+18.5%) – Department of Housing and Urban Development
    Gone. $302.9 down...

    $46.7 billion (+12.8%) – Department of Education
    Gone. $349.6 down...

    $42.7 billion (+1.2%) – Department of Homeland Security
    Gone. $392.3 down...

    $26.3 billion (−0.4%) – Department of Energy
    Gone. $418.6 down...

    $26.0 billion (+8.8%) – Department of Agriculture
    Gone. $444.6 down...

    $23.9 billion (−6.3%) – Department of Justice
    Gone. $468.5 down...

    $18.7 billion (+5.1%) – National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    Gone. $487.2 down...

    $13.8 billion (+48.4%) – Department of Commerce
    Gone. $501 down...

    $13.3 billion (+4.7%) – Department of Labor
    Gone. $514.3 down...

    $13.3 billion (+4.7%) – Department of the Treasury
    Might keep this one, though they would have to prove themselves worth their keep.

    $12.0 billion (+6.2%) – Department of the Interior
    Gone. $526 down...

    $10.5 billion (+34.6%) – Environmental Protection Agency
    Might keep this one, but only to observe and report. ZERO executive power. Let us say we cut them by 71% (7.5 billion)

    $533.5 down...

    $9.7 billion (+10.2%) – Social Security Administration
    Gone. $540.5 down...

    $7.0 billion (+1.4%) – National Science Foundation
    Gone. $547.5 down...

    $5.1 billion (−3.8%) – Corps of Engineers
    Gone. $552.6 down...

    $5.0 billion (+100%-NA) – National Infrastructure Bank
    Gone. $557.6 down...

    $1.1 billion (+22.2%) – Corporation for National and Community Service
    Gone. $558.7 down...

    $0.7 billion (0.0%) – Small Business Administration
    Gone. $559.8 down...

    $0.6 billion (−14.3%) – General Services Administration
    Gone. $560.4 down...

    $0 billion (−100%-NA) – Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)
    Gone. $560.4 down...

    $0 billion (−100%-NA) – Financial stabilization efforts
    Gone. $560.4 down...

    $11 billion (+275%-NA) – Potential disaster costs
    Gone. $571.4 down...

    $19.8 billion (+3.7%) – Other Agencies
    Gone. $591.2 billion

    $591.2 plus $471.23 (defense) == approx. 1.063 trillion dollars cut.

    Not so difficult, actually. Trim the fat, restore the business environment and it is almost miraculous to observe how a nation returns to economic health.

    I say put the bulk of it to the torch and those in our way to the sword.

    Have a nice day.
    --

    http://freedomisobvious.blogspot.com
    http://turnyourbackonthem.wordpress.com

    ignominia et contemptum tyrannis

    Habeo excelsum artem; afflixerim cum crudelitate illis qui laedas me

    The affairs of gold-laden Gyges do not interest me.
    Zealousy of the gods has never seized me nor anger
    at their deeds. But I have no love for great tyranny
    for its deeds are very far from my eyes. -Archilochus

  • #16
    Member osan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Right here
    Posts
    5,510
    Blog Entries
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oyarde View Post
    You could fund the allowable spending under Article One , Section Eight easily and give Americans a tax break and still chip away at the debt , and put eveerthing else back where it belongs , with the states , the people , private charities and tip jars.
    Bullshit.We repudiate the debt in toto and in one fell swoop. It is rotten to the core and is therefore illegitimate. Not a soul in these United States owes so much as a red cent toward this falsely assumed debt. Dissolve the Federal Reserve Bank, seize its assets as well as those of all its members. Hunt those men down globally, capture them, try them, convict them, sentence them, and publicly execute every last one of them, broadcast live to the entire planet as a warning to anyone who trespasses upon us.

    Were I king the world would clamor to trade with the good people of the USA. Likewise they would lose control of their basic bodily functions and quake in their shoes at the very hint of a thought of crossing us. THAT is what we should be. Free, strong, friendly, kind, fair, and implacable when offended.
    --

    http://freedomisobvious.blogspot.com
    http://turnyourbackonthem.wordpress.com

    ignominia et contemptum tyrannis

    Habeo excelsum artem; afflixerim cum crudelitate illis qui laedas me

    The affairs of gold-laden Gyges do not interest me.
    Zealousy of the gods has never seized me nor anger
    at their deeds. But I have no love for great tyranny
    for its deeds are very far from my eyes. -Archilochus

  • #17

    Default

    I believe in corporate tax.
    "I am, therefore I'll think" - Ayn Rand

  • #18

    Default

    "Defense?" Are you kidding? The best defense in this case is not to have an offense. Standing militaries are ALWAYS meant to keep the people down. They're a jobs program that also secures the government authority structure. Military security means security for rulers, not the people.

    Bottom line. At the federal level the US needs a coast guard, a border patrol, and an air defense system. You're talking $50 billion max per year.

    Who's going to attack us? I mean really. Mexico? Not with any military they aren't.

    Al Qaeda attacked us because of our meddling. Stop meddling and we don't get attacked.
    Last edited by furface; 02-28-2012 at 08:56 AM.

  • #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by No Free Beer View Post
    I believe in corporate tax.
    Dr. Paul doesn't which puzzles me because I believe it is condoned by the Constitution?

    Anyways I still can't think of a way to fund defense without income and corporate tax. Maybe I'm just not creative enough?

  • #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Black Dog View Post
    Dr. Paul doesn't which puzzles me because I believe it is condoned by the Constitution?
    Where? And to that point,,can you even find the word "Corporation" in the Constitution?

    it is my understanding that Corporations are a later invention of the legal system in collusion with Government entities (Graft).
    Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
    Ron Paul 2004

    Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
    It's all about Freedom

  • Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •