Ayatollah Rick says he opposes separation between church and state

[Agorism]

No it doesn't. Why would states then have the right to ban drugs or alcohol? States do have the constitutional power to ban certain substances, the federal government does not without a constitutional amendment.

No states don't have the right to ban any commerce what so ever.

[Agorism]

edit-post duplicated for some reason

[FrankRep]

Rick supports the right of states to ban contraception

,which would violates interstate commerce law.

Good.

Rick Santorum supports the State's Authority to make Laws.

Ron Paul also supports State's Authority to make Laws.

[FrankRep]

No states don't have the right to ban any commerce what so ever.

States can make drugs illegal and they can ban contraception. Yes, they do have the right.

[Gary4Liberty]

I'm not sure on that.

,but if it's not in the Constitution, it should be.

The founding fathers disagreed, thats why its not in the constitution. The government shall make NO LAW respecting the establishment of religion or the FREE EXERCISE THEREOF. Thats what it says. Very clear. Very plain. anti-religious bigots please exit left america is not for you. Thanks.

[eduardo89]

No states don't have the right to ban any commerce what so ever.

Yes they do. Why do you think Ron Paul days drug policy is a state issue? It's because states have the power to ban or legalize drugs. Why were states able to ban alcohol before a constitutional amendment made prohibition nationwide? Why are there still some dry counties? State government does have the power to ban substances.

[Agorism]

Commerce clause was reinterpreted during the New Deal to allow the government to regulate interstate commerce, which was bad.

Neither states not federal government should get to regulate commerce.

[Agorism]

States can make drugs illegal and they can ban contraception. Yes, they do have the right.

Honestly if they have that "right" then they are no better than the federal government.

[FrankRep]

Commerce clause was reinterpreted during the New Deal to allow the government to regulate interstate commerce, which was bad.

Update:

Neither states not federal government should get to regulate commerce.

Wait, did you just prove yourself wrong?

You just said the Government took away the power of the states, "which was bad."

I agree... That was bad. The States DO have the authority.

[eduardo89]

Commerce clause was reinterpreted during the New Deal to allow the government to regulate interstate commerce, which was bad.

Neither states not federal government should get to regulate commerce.

Now you're backtracking on your previous argument. States do have the right to regulate intrastate commerce, the federal government does have the power to regulate interstate commerce. The New Deal era, however, grossly distorted the federal government's reach into intrastate commerce.