Romney and Paul successfully call Santorum’s conservatism into question

[sailingaway]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...vMUR_blog.html

[PolicyReader]

Headline and first paragraph are pretty solid, the rest needs the usual MSM filter applied to cull out all the Paul/Romney buddy movie tripe and the end focusing on Romney as the winner in the whole situation is another awesome "balanced" moment.
Still with how many voters focus on the headlines more than anything else, on balance I'll still take it

[Edward]

[Brian4Liberty]

The good part!

“I find it really fascinating that, when people are running for office, they’re really fiscally conservative,” Paul said. “When they’re in office, they do something different.”

Later in the debate, Paul doubled down, hitting Santorum hard for voting in favor of spending bills that included funding for Planned Parenthood.

“If you voted for Planned Parenthood like the senator has, you voted for birth control pills,” Paul said. “And you literally, because funds are fungible, you literally vote for abortions because Planned Parenthood gets the money.”

This attack seemed to get more traction than any other, and Santorum’s explanation that the Planned Parenthood funding was part of a larger bill that he had to vote up or down on drew some groans from the audience — twice.