The RevPac "Game Changer" Poll watching app

[jmdrake]

It's called "election fraud", not "voter fraud".

Okay. I care not about the terminology. We just need to know what we're up against. It ain't some random "accident" or "mistake". Sometime eager supporters cry wolf. This isn't one of those times.

[parocks]

They didn't just "leave off" Waldo. Did you not even watch the OP video? The zeroed it out, then they tried to give Romney a majority of the votes when Ron Paul one the majority and Romney came in third! Come on dude! Sometimes a duck is a freaking duck. Remember this is the same GOP apparatus that tried not to count two of the caucuses even though one was postposed by the GOP itself. They are pulling out all stops legal, illegal or otherwise and we don't do ourselves any service minimizing the truth.

Where you at? I'm in MAINE.

You want to see a link?

I was one of the first to analyze the terrible set of data that came out last Sunday.

Posted on 2/11 at 11:12 - Subject: Where's Waldo?
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...-Where-s-Waldo

I pointed out the missing results on the official sheet in Waldo and Waterville. And I didn't see you there commenting on it then.

Check this one, by 6a Monday 2/12 I had been over the numbers again, and found more errors.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...=1#post4173411

This thread was the first of many attempts to systematically discover where the errors were, and it was over a week ago, started less than hours after the release of the figures.

[Suzu]

I care not about the terminology. We just need to know what we're up against.

There is a huge difference between the two terms, and it is important to make the distinction. If it didn't matter, I wouldn't waste time pointing it out.

[KingNothing]

There's a difference between "error" and "fraud".

There were errors. A lot of errors. Way too many errors. An embarassing number of errors. A "Charlie Must Go" number of errors.

But errors aren't the same as fraud.

What happened in Somerset might be seen as fraud. What happened in Cumberland might be seen as fraud.

But leaving off most of Waldo, leaving off Waterville, that was comically sloppy error. But they fixed the error. I think what I'm looking at is people who are not good at their jobs. But I don't see fraud. I'm not saying it isn't there, but no one has come up with anything.

The campaign should have their own totals, from Ron Paul supporters calling them in, or emailing them, or the county coordinators. The numbers that the Ron Paul campaign has might be different from the Maine GOP totals. And they might be sitting on them for tactical reasons. But I see no evidence of that.

This is a truly wonderful post. I love it when people don't throw bombastic, Serious, claims around with absolutely no evidence.

You've done great work on Maine!

[LibertyRevolution]

Exit polls are worthless, thus this app is worthless.
NOT A GAME CHANGER.

[jmdrake]

Where you at? I'm in MAINE.

You want to see a link?

I was one of the first to analyze the terrible set of data that came out last Sunday.

Posted on 2/11 at 11:12 - Subject: Where's Waldo?
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...-Where-s-Waldo

I pointed out the missing results on the official sheet in Waldo and Waterville. And I didn't see you there commenting on it then.

Check this one, by 6a Monday 2/12 I had been over the numbers again, and found more errors.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...=1#post4173411

This thread was the first of many attempts to systematically discover where the errors were, and it was over a week ago, started less than hours after the release of the figures.

Well good for you! (Seriously. Not being sarcastic). But trying not to count Washington County was not a "mistake". It was a clear attempt at manipulation of the election process.