Page 12 of 13 FirstFirst ... 210111213 LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 125

Thread: 'Shark Tank' Inventor Loses Big to 'Buy American' Fallacy

  1. #111
    Senior Skeptic Brian4Liberty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    18,138
    Blog Entries
    9

    Default

    Apple to Officially Build Computers in the U.S.

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/benzinga...rs-in-the-u-s/

    "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." - Lord Acton
    "Foreign aid is taking money from the poor people of a rich country, and giving it to the rich people of a poor country." - Ron Paul
    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Benjamin Franklin
    "Beware the Military-Industrial-Financial-Corporate-Media-Government Complex." - B4L update of General Dwight D. Eisenhower
    "Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem." - Ronald Reagan
    "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself, and we must reject those who spread fear." - B4L update of FDR
    "The Ministry of Truth can turn on a dime, and the fury of the ignorant masses can be redirected at will." - B4L
    "Marxists become Fascists the minute they become rich, yet they retain the Marxist rhetoric." - B4L
    "Debt is the drug, Wall St. Banksters are the dealers, and politicians are the addicts." - B4L
    "Thing is, the world is full of a**holes." - ACPTulsa

    Twitter: B4Liberty‏@USAB4L


  2. Remove this section of ads by registering or logging in. Forget your password? Click here.




  3. #112

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post

    Edit: And for the record, I wasn't attacking companies who outsource so quit being defensive! I was applauding the decision of the inventor in the OP to want to manufacture in the U.S.
    I want world peace and to end starvation. APPLAUD ME!

  4. #113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Henry Rogue View Post
    Epic fail. Innovation and automation create jobs.
    Taken to an extreme, this is not true. Eventually, one can expect innovation and automation to completely eliminate jobs entirely.

  5. #114

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KingNothing View Post
    Taken to an extreme, this is not true. Eventually, one can expect innovation and automation to completely eliminate jobs entirely.
    exactly, because he is assuming automation always needs maintainence, deployment, and even if they do, they will always employ the same amount of people as the people that they put out of work and demand. At first, innovations and automations DO need lots of maintainence, repair and customer support, but that only lasts as long as 1) consumption is increasing 2) the quality of maintainence maintains, once it improves, repair jobs disappear too. Again, I have not once said unemployment is bad or employment is good.

  6. #115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KingNothing View Post
    Taken to an extreme, this is not true. Eventually, one can expect innovation and automation to completely eliminate jobs entirely.
    I don't think that is the best way to think of things. Automation also opens up entirely new possibilities and with that, entirely new innovations and markets.

    You know, there were a lot of people who thought the same thing as you, back when automobiles were replacing buggies.
    "We do have some differences and our approaches will be different, but that makes him his own person. I mean why should he [Rand] be a clone and do everything and think just exactly as I have. I think it's an opportunity to be independent minded. We are about 99% the same on issues." "People Try To Drive Wedges Between Rand And Me." --Ron Paul

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=pB5JgzBVHN0


  7. #116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LibertyEagle View Post
    I don't think that is the best way to think of things. Automation also opens up entirely new possibilities and with that, entirely new innovations and markets.

    You know, there were a lot of people who thought the same thing as you, back when automobiles were replacing buggies.
    Do I get my question answered? Yes, I will agree that automation brings jobs with it, but do you disagree that not only do they bring in less than are replaced, but also, as quality of products increase, jobs decrease (due to lack of demand for repair and maintanence)?

    So, I hope you can answer me, since you wanted to know if I was serious. What's wrong with unemployment if money were not the concern? Or what's good about employment if money were not the concern?

  8. #117

    Default

    If we take it to the logical conclusion, we could pretty much just sit on our asses and let robots do everything for us. We could have 99% unemployment, and still have more wealth and standard of living than now.

  9. #118

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Qdog View Post
    If we take it to the logical conclusion, we could pretty much just sit on our asses and let robots do everything for us. We could have 99% unemployment, and still have more wealth and standard of living than now.
    yes, we can. Standard of living may or may not increase, standard of living is largely subjective. Some people value free time, some people value not working, some people value variety of foods and entertainment, some people value education and medical care.

  10. #119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tpoints View Post
    Do I get my question answered? Yes, I will agree that automation brings jobs with it, but do you disagree that not only do they bring in less than are replaced, but also, as quality of products increase, jobs decrease (due to lack of demand for repair and maintanence)?
    No, because it frees those people up to do other things.

    So, I hope you can answer me, since you wanted to know if I was serious. What's wrong with unemployment if money were not the concern? Or what's good about employment if money were not the concern?
    I'm not into Communism. But, thanks anyway.
    "We do have some differences and our approaches will be different, but that makes him his own person. I mean why should he [Rand] be a clone and do everything and think just exactly as I have. I think it's an opportunity to be independent minded. We are about 99% the same on issues." "People Try To Drive Wedges Between Rand And Me." --Ron Paul

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=pB5JgzBVHN0


  11. #120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LibertyEagle View Post
    No, because it frees those people up to do other things.

    I'm not into Communism. But, thanks anyway.
    Contradiction? Frees people to do other things doesn't mean they WILL be employed, just that they CAN. I'm not the one who says there's anything wrong with unemployment, unemployment is exactly that : FREES PEOPLE TO DO OTHER THINGS, not necessarily payable jobs or productive things. So again, what's wrong with unemployment or what's right with employment?

    Are you basically telling me jobs lost by automation is good, but jobs lost by offshoring is bad? There are good kinds of unemployment as well as bad kinds? Why isn't unemployment by outsourcing/offshoring "freeing people to do other things"?
    Last edited by Tpoints; 12-06-2012 at 02:56 PM.

Page 12 of 13 FirstFirst ... 210111213 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •