Alright so I understand completely that RP wants to localize basically everything, but this is one thing I'm still unclear on. Would a state be able to violate its citizens' civil liberties (example: Utah outlaws all religions except Mormonism) if its representatives chose to do so? Or not? And if a state were not allowed to do that in a Ron Paul America, what would be done about it?
I'm a bit torn on this issue because while I'm all for decentralized authority, at the same time ehhh... I'm not sure how to put this; I guess I'm uncomfortable with the notion that people with not enough resources to relocate could be potentially stuck in a state that wants to turn itself into a theocracy (for example).
Just some cognitive dissonance I guess. I like the idea of everyone having freedom, but I don't think you can have that without centralized authority which guarantees tyranny and corruption, which is a tad contradictory.
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us