Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: Fact Checking: Ron Paul’s strange claim about bases and troops overseas, WaPo

  1. #1

    Default Fact Checking: Ron Paul’s strange claim about bases and troops overseas, WaPo

    Ron Paul’s strange claim about bases and troops overseas

    Posted by
    Glenn Kessler

    “We don't need to pay all this money to keep troops all over the country, 130 countries, 900 bases. But also, just think, bringing all the troops home rather rapidly, they would be spending their money here at home and not in Germany and Japan and South Korea, tremendous boost to the economy.”— Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.), Feb. 7, 2012

    This comment by GOP presidential aspirant Ron Paul after Tuesday night’s caucuses caught the ear of our editor. Paul’s phrasing could have left the impression that he thinks there are 900 bases in 130 countries, but normally he makes it clear he is talking about two different things.
    For instance, in the GOP debate Sept. 12, Paul said: “We're under great threat, because we occupy so many countries. We're in 130 countries. We have 900 bases around the world.”We will lay aside Paul’s loose definition of “occupy” — which denotes taking away a country’s sovereignty. You could also quibble with the concept of a “base,” but we’ll accept that he’s talking about any military facility.Are there any facts to back up these eye-popping figures?

    The Facts
    First of all, Paul needs to update his rhetoric. He is still using the same numbers now that he used in September, but since then, the United States pulled out of Iraq, closing scores, if not hundreds, of facilities. So one would have to scratch Iraq off the “occupy” list. (A Paul spokesman did not respond to a query.) In any case, the Defense Department every year publishes a list of military facilities in the United States and around the world. As of Sept. 30, 2010, the DOD list shows a list of 611 military facilities around the world (not counting war zones), though only 20 are listed as “large sites,” which means a replacement value of more than $1.74 billion.Most of these — 549 — are small sites, sometimes very, very small. In fact, some sites appear to be double-counted.

    There is Spangdahlem Air Force base in Germany, which houses the 52nd Fighter Wing and is counted as a large site. But a separate “base” on the list is the sprawling Spangdahlem Waste Annex, all of three acres, with four buildings totaling 6,500 square feet.
    The DOD list does not include war zones, but we know that Iraq has no U.S. troops now, so that would just leave Afghanistan. GlobalSecurity.org, a comprehensive Web site for military information, lists 106 U.S. military facilities in Afghanistan.

    So, it is hard to see how one gets the list above 750 overseas military facilities, and that’s only if one generously concludes even waste dumps and the like as “military bases.”
    The DOD report also shows that these bases are housed on the soil of about 40 countries. (Again, you can quibble over whether Guantanamo Bay in Cuba or certain military-only islands count as foreign countries.) So how does Paul get to the claim that U.S. troops are in 130 countries? Another DOD document tells the story. This one lists how many personnel are based in the United States and other countries.

    For instance, as of Sept. 30, 2011, there were 53,766 military personnel in Germany, 39,222 in Japan, 10,801 in Italy and 9,382 in the United Kingdom. That makes sense.
    But wait, scanning the list, you also see nine troops in Mali, eight in Barbados, seven in Laos, six in Lithuania, five in Lebanon, four in Moldova, three in Mongolia, two in Suriname and one in Gabon. Most of the countries on the list, in fact, have puny military representation. Not only that, but we count 153 countries with U.S. military personnel, actually higher than the 130 cited by Paul. What’s going on here?

    The answer is that the list essentially tracks with places where the United States has a substantial diplomatic presence. (The United States has diplomatic relations with about 190 countries.)
    In other words, Paul is counting Marine guards and military attaches as part of a vast expanse of U.S. military power around the globe. (In fact, under Paul’s logic, dozens of other countries are “occupying” Washington when they send attaches and other militray personnel to their embassies here.) But this document indicates that only 11 countries actually house more than 1,000 U.S. military personnel.

    The Pinocchio Test
    As evidence of the United States occupying “so many countries” or the “all this money” spent on the military, Paul’s statistics barely pass the laugh test. He has managed to turn small contingents of Marine guards into occupying armies and waste dumps into military bases. A more accurate way to treat this data would be to say that the United States has 20 major bases around the world, not counting the war in Afghanistan, with major concentrations of troops in 11 countries.

    h ttp://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/ron-pauls-strange-claim-about-bases-and-troops-overseas/2012/02/08/gIQApZpqzQ_blog.html



    mod edit 2/14/12 - rebuttal from Laurence Vance:
    http://lewrockwell.com/vance/vance278.html
    Last edited by jct74; 02-14-2012 at 04:32 PM.
    " Anyone can become angry. That is easy. But to be angry with the right person, to the right degree, at the right time, for the right purpose and in the right way - that is not easy." --Aristotle



  • #2

    Default

    link? Since this is a hit piece, please break it when you post it. Thanks.
    "We do have some differences and our approaches will be different, but that makes him his own person. I mean why should he [Rand] be a clone and do everything and think just exactly as I have. I think it's an opportunity to be independent minded. We are about 99% the same on issues." "People Try To Drive Wedges Between Rand And Me." --Ron Paul

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=pB5JgzBVHN0


  • #3
    Member newbitech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    7,595
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    great, so now instead of dividing that insane empire budget by 900 I get to divide it by 20? I feel so much better now...

  • #4
    Moderator malkusm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    5,308
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default

    Yes, because the difference between 611 military installments and "over 900" clearly undermines Dr. Paul's philosophy.



  • #5
    Moderator malkusm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    5,308
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by newbitech View Post
    great, so now instead of dividing that insane empire budget by 900 I get to divide it by 20? I feel so much better now...
    +rep, you put it better than I did



  • #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Where I'm at
    Posts
    4,164

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by american.swan View Post
    Ron Paul’s strange claim about bases and troops overseas

    Posted by
    [B]Glenn Kessler



  • #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LibertyEagle View Post
    link? Since this is a hit piece, please break it when you post it. Thanks.
    I'm not sure it this is exactly what I'd call a hit piece, because Ron Paul and libertarians look at the same numbers differently. WHY does the US government have "relations" with 190 countries? Sure Boing or Microsoft can have "relations" with 190 countries, but why the US government?

    Anyways here's the link: h t t p://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/ron-pauls-strange-claim-about-bases-and-troops-overseas/2012/02/08/gIQApZpqzQ_blog.html
    " Anyone can become angry. That is easy. But to be angry with the right person, to the right degree, at the right time, for the right purpose and in the right way - that is not easy." --Aristotle

  • #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by american.swan View Post
    I'm not sure it this is exactly what I'd call a hit piece, because Ron Paul and libertarians look at the same numbers differently. WHY does the US government have "relations" with 190 countries? Sure Boing or Microsoft can have "relations" with 190 countries, but why the US government?

    Anyways here's the link: h t t p://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/ron-pauls-strange-claim-about-bases-and-troops-overseas/2012/02/08/gIQApZpqzQ_blog.html
    I don't think I would call this a hit piece either. The Pinocchio Test is Kessler's schtick and there is no evidence to show that he goes out of his way to pick on Ron... he got "Three Pinocchios", btw. Ron got caught playing a little fast and loose with the details, but the essence of his statement is true. It's all good information to familiarize ourselves with. I had no idea that we had so many troops in Germany, Japan, Italy, and the UK.

  • #9

    Default

    Rand Paul's strange ideas ---> Ron Paul's strange claims
    The more things change, the more they stay the same.
    "Mr. Roark, we’re alone here. Why don’t you tell me what you think of me? In any words you wish. No one will hear us."
    "But I don’t think of you."
    ~Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead

  • #10

    Default

    Why weren't the numbers for Korea available? Anyways. 1.4 Million military stationed abroad somewhere. WOW.
    " Anyone can become angry. That is easy. But to be angry with the right person, to the right degree, at the right time, for the right purpose and in the right way - that is not easy." --Aristotle

  • Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •