Ron Paul HAS to go on the ATTACK.

[unknown]

Its not even a question anymore.

He has to expose every one of them on their flip-flopping, big government, big spending ways. And he HAS to self promote.

He has to appeal to American voters that they cast their ballots based on records NOT rhetoric.

That he is the only one with a conservative record, that he is the only one who can be trusted to do what he says.

In every interview, in every debate, at every speech.

[LineHogs]

Though I agree Paul should be somewhat on the attack.... It's just not his nature. Much like John McCain it doesn't suit him. When McCain attacked Obama he didn't come off as genuine. There was no real outrage. He was pressured by the right wing media round about the second debate and tried to go on the offensive. After a career of pandering it wasn't his style.

In Paul's case he can stir up legitimate passion but he has to wait for the opportunity. Whenever a true Liberty issue comes up that's when Paul can attack. If he does it with passion because it's something he's truly passionate about..... People will listen. If he tries to be something he's not he will come off as a desperate man and most likely a dishonest one. People don't recognize the character of a person based on their words. They recognize it based on their presentation. their facial expressions ect ect. Which is why it is so vitally improtant to be genuine. If people recognize his outrage they will listen to the words and that's how you spread liberty..... In defense of it.

Still though good post.