Video update: Ron Paul owns foreign policy questions on Fox with Greta Van Susteren

[jct74]

Don’t miss this interview tonight. With so much going on in the world, this is the perfect chance to see how a President Paul would handle the problems. Tune in tonight at 10pm to see Congressman Ron Paul go ON THE RECORD at 10pm.

http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/...-10pm-tonight/


stream:
http://livestation.me/2011/foxnews/


update: thanks Immortal Technique for the tube, you can +rep him in post 108


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrUavLPgLqY

[moonshine5757]

perfect opportunity for ron paul to say something that will grab headlines, but he probably won't.

[bluesc]

Hopefully he is going to test out some new language. It's time for debates to be substantial for him.

[FSP-Rebel]

Massive viewage! But we already know that he won't reformat his foreign policy delivery per his FL speech via NV where he handed us that swift kick in the bollocks. Does he not see that Rand's practical approach works better with the gop base. The strict anti-war lingo has attained as much mileage as it was going to.

[sailingaway]

Not sure that's a good idea, she is solidly pro Newt. On the other hand, he does have to do Fox.

[CaptUSA]

perfect opportunity for ron paul to say something that will grab headlines, but he probably won't.

Any suggestions?

It's hard to grab headlines when you're consistent. Everyone already knows where Paul stands on the issues. I suppose he could call out the process, but then he'd be playing the Gingrich game. It may be good for TV, but it won't win many votes.

I'd like to think of a way to change the narrative, but I think it's going to be up to voters now. Paul will either have to have a big victory somewhere or concrete, irrefutable evidence must come out about election fraud on a massive scale.

[bluesc]

Not sure that's a good idea, she is solidly pro Newt. On the other hand, he does have to do Fox.

Greta isn't awful. Of the Fox hosts with decent ratings, I'm guessing Greta and Baier are the only ones Paul can stand to talk to. Good to take advantage of every opportunity since he skips the other big two - Hannity and O'Reilly (the latter understandably).

[moonshine5757]

Any suggestions?

It's hard to grab headlines when you're consistent. Everyone already knows where Paul stands on the issues. I suppose he could call out the process, but then he'd be playing the Gingrich game. It may be good for TV, but it won't win many votes.

I'd like to think of a way to change the narrative, but I think it's going to be up to voters now. Paul will either have to have a big victory somewhere or concrete, irrefutable evidence must come out about election fraud on a massive scale.

I would play the Gingrich game and challenge the media. Point out the bias coverage, that type of talk won Gingrich SC. What hurt Gingrich is that after all that tough talk he has no integrity, but Paul doesn't have to worry about that. If I was him I would really really try to say something bold and a tad controversial that will get replayed over and over again. Even if it might spark some negative feedback it still will be feedback either way.

[Edward]

Greta isn't awful. Of the Fox hosts with decent ratings, I'm guessing Greta and Baier are the only ones Paul can stand to talk to. Good to take advantage of every opportunity since he skips the other big two - Hannity and O'Reilly (the latter understandably).

I don't think Greta has an axe to grind with Ron. A few weeks ago she two or three times attempted to get Dick Morris to comment on "all of the candidates" and he avoided mentioning or alluding to Ron. A few minutes later, she explicitly asked Brit Hume, "What about Ron Paul? I failed to get Dick Morris to comment on him earlier."

[phill4paul]

Jobs,jobs,jobs,economy,economy,economy,appropriate funds from foreign aid to shore up S.S. and medicare,appropriate funds from foreign aid to shore up S.S. and medicare,appropriate funds from foreign aid to shore up S.S. and medicare, economy,economy,economy,jobs,jobs,jobs.