Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 36

Thread: Pakistan to side with Iran if attacked!

  1. #21

    Default

    Obama has fumbled US foreign policy horribly. Congress should hold a special session and award him idiot of the year award.

    Two countries on which Obama has spent billions of tax payers money publicaly saying they would support US opponents in their war with US speaks volumes about idiotic FP of Obama or rather his masters.

    Afghanistan would side with Pakistan in war with US ... - The Guardian
    Oct 23, 2011 ... President says Afghans 'will never betray their brother' in TV interview aired days
    after Kabul visit by Hillary Clinton.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/.../...s-hamid-karzai


  2. Remove this section of ads by registering or logging in. Forget your password? Click here.




  3. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moderate libertarian View Post
    Obama has fumbled US foreign policy horribly. Congress should hold a special session and award him idiot of the year award.

    Two countries on which Obama has spent billions of tax payers money publicaly saying they would support US opponents in their war with US speaks volumes about idiotic FP of Obama or rather his masters.

    Afghanistan would side with Pakistan in war with US ... - The Guardian
    Oct 23, 2011 ... President says Afghans 'will never betray their brother' in TV interview aired days
    after Kabul visit by Hillary Clinton.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/.../...s-hamid-karzai
    Exactly. Total misuse of funds.

    Also, the assassination of Bin Ladin, breaching their sovereignty might be a reason why Pakistan turned so hostile against US, that and costant border attacks and sovereignty breaching. However, Pakistanis were never US allies. There is a very good documentary "The hunt for Osama" or something like that that shows how Osama was able to escape many ambushes because Pakistani generals tipped him off about US raids. That alone should have been warning signs Pakistanis were not friendlies and giving them aid was very bad idea, very much like pumping a cancerous tumor and helping it grow.
    Last edited by JuicyG; 02-06-2012 at 06:14 PM.
    Let`s get Ron Paul into top 10 to generate headlines. We need more people.

    "What does not kill me, makes me stronger."
    - Friedrich Nietzsche, philosopher (1844-1900), Twilight of the Idols

    "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
    - Arthur Schopenhauer, philosopher (1788 - 1860)

    https://twitter.com/#!/JuicyGrabs

  4. #23

    Default

    What`s more amazing is that Pakistan is already attacking US targets in Afghanistan. Also when Karzai found out US might start war with Pakistan he said Afghanistan will side with Pakistan. Can you imagine that? All this nation building was for what? So they can shoot us in the back? If this is not failed strategy across the board don`t know what is.

    Like Ron Paul says, if you start a war you have to know your target, you have to destroy it and get back home, not some total joke of rub mine to rub yours.

    Admiral Mike Mullen, outgoing Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, recently told Congress that the Haqqani Network, a guerrilla group accused of hitting the US embassy in Kabul, is an “arm” of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) immediately suggested that if the US military wanted to attack Pakistan, it would have support on the Hill.

    The astonishing talk of US military action against its Pakistani ally has died down a bit, but it was noticed in the region. On Saturday, President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan pledged that if the US did go to war against Pakistan, Afghanistan would take the side of Islamabad.

    The film clip can be seen here. http://indiatoday.intoday.in/video/h.../1/157205.html

    It has long been apparent that Karzai, a putative American ally, has some sort of mental problem. He has been known to rant that he made a mistake in allying with the US against the Taliban, and should have backed the latter. Last year he told astonished visiting US congressmen that if the US pressured him too much, he would join the Taliban directly.

    It would sort of be as though Prime Minister David Cameron, an ally of the US, should occasionally threaten to join al-Qaeda.

    But then sometimes he praises the US and lambastes Pakistan for supporting Taliban
    http://www.juancole.com/2011/10/karz...r-with-us.html
    Last edited by JuicyG; 02-06-2012 at 06:26 PM.
    Let`s get Ron Paul into top 10 to generate headlines. We need more people.

    "What does not kill me, makes me stronger."
    - Friedrich Nietzsche, philosopher (1844-1900), Twilight of the Idols

    "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
    - Arthur Schopenhauer, philosopher (1788 - 1860)

    https://twitter.com/#!/JuicyGrabs

  5. #24

    Default

    Of course Afghanistan would side with Pakistan. First of all Pakistan has intelligence officials all over Afghanistan making the real decisions there, not to mention they support the Taliban. Plus they're neighbours. You think Afghanistan is going to care about America, a country that's thousands of miles away that has been trying to enforce a political and social structure that is foreign to them? They know what happened to the Russians. They'll just bide their time and wait for the empire to collapse.

  6. #25
    Member Pauls' Revere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    California (Socialized Hell)
    Posts
    4,187

    Default

    From article:

    Is the world counting down to "D-Day"? After US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta estimated that Israel would attack Iran by June, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned government officials against "Iran chatter," A European diplomat based in Pakistan said that if Israel attacks, Islamabad will have no choice but to support any Iranian retaliation.

    So, what happens if the U.S. is the one to strike?
    Currently has:
    $5,521 Federal Reserve Notes in circulation stamped "NOT BACKED BY GOLD"

    - SUPPORT FREE TRADE, SMUGGLE -

    2 + 2 = 5.

  7. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JuicyG View Post
    ...and India will fight Pakistan, Afghanistan already asked India for their help in case of a US withdrawal. I`m afraid WW3 is happening before our eyes.
    And when you stop and think how much foreign aid has US pumped into Pakistan and now they`re basically hostile country. They`ve also stopped allowing troop reinforcements to Afghanistan to pass through not long ago.

    Ron Paul was so right about wasted foreign aid.
    I don't think India will get involved. Russia, India's traditional ally, said it would support Iran. India hates Pakistan, yes, but does not have problems with Iran and Russia. Pakistan and Iran are Islamic countries and Pakistan will try to help Iran but I believe the Obama adminstration is also after Pakistan.

    The warmongers in this country want a war with either Iran or Pakistan.

  8. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RonPaulMyPresident View Post
    I don't think India will get involved. Russia, India's traditional ally, said it would support Iran. India hates Pakistan, yes, but does not have problems with Iran and Russia. Pakistan and Iran are Islamic countries and Pakistan will try to help Iran but I believe the Obama adminstration is also after Pakistan.

    The warmongers in this country want a war with either Iran or Pakistan.
    Pakistan has nukes. We don't invade countries with nukes. Just look at North Korea. It's the only country on Bush's fake "axis of evil"[1] not to be seriously screwed with. Why? Cause they successfully tested a nuke.

    [1]Actually Bush made up that term to divert attention from U.S. involvement with Al Qaeda via Pakistan. The Northern Alliance initially coined the term "alliance of evil" to refer to Al Qaeda, the Taliban and the Pakistani ISI. The Pakistani ISI has close ties to the CIA.
    9/11 Thermate experiments

    Eze 22:25 There's a conspiracy of prophets within her....

    "I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

    "We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
    The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.

  9. #28
    no fly zone flightlesskiwi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    NM, the unenchanted part
    Posts
    3,949

    Default

    that's why i mention Africa as looking more lucrative.

    no nukes. just enough chaos to call for military action under guise of humanitarianism. crude oil.

    did i mention AFRICOM? check out the website every once in a while and see how many "wonderful" things the .mil is doing under that command in that continent. seriously. it's sooooo awesome. /s

    Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
    Pakistan has nukes. We don't invade countries with nukes. Just look at North Korea. It's the only country on Bush's fake "axis of evil"[1] not to be seriously screwed with. Why? Cause they successfully tested a nuke.

    [1]Actually Bush made up that term to divert attention from U.S. involvement with Al Qaeda via Pakistan. The Northern Alliance initially coined the term "alliance of evil" to refer to Al Qaeda, the Taliban and the Pakistani ISI. The Pakistani ISI has close ties to the CIA.

  10. #29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RonPaulMyPresident View Post
    I don't think India will get involved. Russia, India's traditional ally, said it would support Iran. India hates Pakistan, yes, but does not have problems with Iran and Russia. Pakistan and Iran are Islamic countries and Pakistan will try to help Iran but I believe the Obama adminstration is also after Pakistan.

    The warmongers in this country want a war with either Iran or Pakistan.
    Isn't Pakistan (for all intents and purposes) already occupied-and their regime bribed-by US forces?
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Paul
    The government is incapable of doing what it's supposed to do. A job like the provision of security is something best left to private institutions.
    My music/art page is here"government is the enemy of liberty"-RP
    That which doesn't kill me has made a grave tactical error
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    This whole board is a thoughtcrime in progress.


  11. #30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by heavenlyboy34 View Post
    Isn't Pakistan (for all intents and purposes) already occupied-and their regime bribed-by US forces?
    Yes the rulers of Pakistan have always been Pro-America, but for how long can they see their people killed by U.S. drones. The Pakistani people are becoming anti-American because of those drone strikes. Maybe the people will rise up against their pro-American government. Our foreign policy is flawed in that part of the world.
    Last edited by RonPaulMyPresident; 02-07-2012 at 04:47 PM.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •