Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: TX - Dallas cops grenade, beat, kick and injure man in raid. No charges filed.

  1. #1
    Ahab Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    In a Nine Line Bind
    Posts
    43,896
    Blog Entries
    12

    Exclamation TX - Dallas cops grenade, beat, kick and injure man in raid. No charges filed.

    I suppose that's what the new dynamic is: cops blow up your house, beat you half to death, leaving you in puddle of blood with permanant injuries, and you should consider yourself lucky that they didn't trump up some phony charges as well.

    Just another isolated incident done by "bad apples"....


    'What the Heck Was That All About?'

    http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/25/43317.htm

    DALLAS (CN) - A diesel mechanic who was making himself lunch in his kitchen says Dallas police fired a flash bomb through his back door, smashed through and "zip tied" his hands behind his back, then beat him until he was bloody and unconscious and ransacked his house - apparently by mistake, as no charges were filed after the chaos subsided.
    In his federal complaint, Danny Cantu, 45, says he has never been convicted of a crime. He has a high school diploma and a degree from ITT as a diesel mechanic.
    Cantu says he was making his lunch in his kitchen on the afternoon of Jan. 22, 2010 when he saw several uniformed officers run into his backyard.
    Almost at once, he says, the officers fired a flash bomb through his back door.
    "In matter of milliseconds after the deafening and frightening explosion, the defendant officers ... forcefully entered the home by ramming through the back door," the complaint states.
    Cantu said the officers did not "knock and announce" their presence or intentions, nor give him a chance to let them into his home peacefully, or otherwise attempt to obtain his consent for them to enter.
    "Upon forcefully and violently entering plaintiffs home, defendant officers ... screamed at plaintiff Danny Cantu to 'get on the ground!' Plaintiff Danny Cantu immediately complied by laying face first on the kitchen floor and spreading his arms and legs while facing the floor beneath him," the complaint states.
    "Defendant officers then proceeded to 'zip tie' plaintiff Danny Cantu's hand behind his back placing him under arrest. Not satisfied with shooting bombs off in plaintiff's home, violently breaking the door down and screaming at plaintiff Danny Cantu for no reason, defendant officers then proceed to repeatedly kick and beat him, causing significant bodily injuries which rendered him unconscious and lying in a pool of his own blood."
    They officers searched the home but "did not find any illegal items or contraband, despite ransacking plaintiff's home, crawling under his home and generally destroying plaintiff's personal property," Cantu says.
    The complaint continues: "Plaintiff Danny Cantu was not charged with any crime in connection with the January 22, 2010 search and arrest conducted by defendant officers and/or defendants John Doe 1 through 10. Plaintiff Danny Cantu was not charged with resisting arrest, assault or any other criminal activity. Defendant officers and/or defendants John Doe 1 through 10 executed the search warrant and subjected plaintiff Danny Cantu to excessive force for unknown reasons."
    It is customary for police to charge people with "resisting arrest" after beating them up. But Cantu said the police did not charge him with anything.
    He says the beating caused him "permanent and severe personal injuries, including, but not limited to, a broken orbital bone and broken nose, a concussion, a traumatic brain injury, loss of vision in his left eye and loss of hearing in his left ear. Plaintiff Danny Cantu's injuries required surgical intervention and caused significant scarring and disfigurement."
    Cantu and his wife seek punitive damages for trespass, false arrest, false imprisonment, assault and battery, conspiracy to violate his constitutional rights, excessive force, and unreasonable search.
    Named as defendants are the City of Dallas, nine named police officers and 10 John Does.
    "It's a Free Country."
    "They hate us for our Freedoms."
    "The troops are protecting your Freedom."




    You're not nuts! You're FISHERMEN!!!



  • #2

    Default

    "let them search you,touch you,violate your Rights,just don't be a dick!"~ cdc482
    "For Wales. Why Richard, it profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world. But for Wales?"
    All my life I've been at the mercy of men just following orders... Never again!~Erik Lehnsherr
    There's nothing wrong with stopping people randomly, especially near bars, restaurants etc.~Velho

  • #3

    Default

    This kind of BS has been going on for over 2 decades, military "type" attacks on American citizens.
    Who really belongs to the "public" that supports these activities?
    What realistic options are there to combat this behavior by "public servants"?
    This fellow is left trying to get redress from the same courts that sanctioned the aggression in the first place.

  • #4

    Default

    conducted by defendant officers and/or defendants John Doe 1 through 10.
    I hope names are forthcoming soon and this is because they have not been identified, and not to protect them. For instance, I'd want to know if my neighbors were participating in this sort of shit so I could stay as far away from them as possible.
    We have allies many of you are not aware of. Watch the tube. Show this to your 30 and under friends. Listen to it. Even if you don't like rap, it has 2.7 million views.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmBnvajSfWU#t=0m16s

    Cut off one min early to avoid war porn.

    Free Roger Pion

  • #5

    Default

    hey, the guy has to be guilty of 'something' and had it coming.... right?....right?...oh well..

    next.

    Lets see...it appears they are going down a list in alphabetical order. My last name starts with a 'K' so i'm ok for now.

  • #6

    Default

    See if you don't resist then you'll be fine. Best just to submit and lay down spread eagle. Compliance is the key to safe interaction with law enforcement.
    In America today there remains two factions.
    The Federalist and the Anti-Federalist.
    Neither of the two dominating political parties belong to the latter.
    You can't be one and the other..

  • #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phill4paul View Post
    See if you don't resist then you'll be fine. Best just to submit and lay down spread eagle. Compliance is the key to safe interaction with law enforcement.

    Or a rapist. Not that there is much difference between the two anymore. In fact, sometimes they are one and the same.

  • #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kylie View Post
    Or a rapist. Not that there is much difference between the two anymore. In fact, sometimes they are one and the same.
    No doubt.
    In America today there remains two factions.
    The Federalist and the Anti-Federalist.
    Neither of the two dominating political parties belong to the latter.
    You can't be one and the other..

  • #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phill4paul View Post
    No doubt.
    I'll die on my feet, thank you very much.

    Being a 100lb chick, I'm not laying down for a rapist or a cop who is a rapist. I'll fight to the death instead.

    At least with a rapist I know I have a fighting chance, not so much with the cops.

  • #10

    Default

    reminds me of the recent chainsaw incident...

    http://boston.cbslocal.com/2012/01/3...urg-apartment/
    Last edited by noneedtoaggress; 02-04-2012 at 01:00 PM.

  • Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •