Foreign Policy

[Jeremy]

If you get an idea as to where he stands, let me know. No mention of foreign policy on http://www.thomasmassie.com/issues/.

There will be other decent people but very few Ron Pauls who will stand up in front of the nation and lecture the neo-cons on how its insane to war monger against a nation like Iran.

Very few Ron Pauls? I don't think you are aware how Ron Paul ran for his congressional seat for decades.

[whoisjohngalt]

If you get an idea as to where he stands, let me know. No mention of foreign policy on http://www.thomasmassie.com/issues/.

There will be other decent people but very few Ron Pauls who will stand up in front of the nation and lecture the neo-cons on how its insane to war monger against a nation like Iran.

Not only is Jeremy's points dead on, but you have to remember that there is no platform to "stand up in front of the nation" when you are running for a small congressional district in Kentucky. Without the platform, "standing on principle" accomplishes nothing for the movement whatsoever. The real issue is that you naysayers value words more than actions, which is a sign of tremendous stupidity.

Luckily, Thomas is going to win, even though you people are so short sighted and are trying to actively damage our efforts.

[bluesc]

Even Rand hadn't "stood on principle" by not endorsing Ron's FP in its entirety, he'd said he & Ron "disagreed on some issues", Massie is doing exactly the same thing

I didn't support Rand when he was running either. I also know where he stands on the war issue.

Massie is marketed as "one of our own" yet has been told to avoid this site and him and his people refuse to say where he stands, instead trying to force support. Rand was asked if there was anything he and his father disagreed on. Massie was there ready with his "I don't agree with Ron" talking points that he forced out at the first mention of Ron. If he wants to distance himself from Ron, he shouldn't market himself to Ron Paul supporters as "one of our own".

[bluesc]

Luckily, Thomas is going to win, even though you people are so short sighted and are trying to actively damage our efforts.

Asking questions about candidates is not actively trying to damage efforts. Please stop saying that, you sound like an idiot.

[Jeremy]

Asking questions about candidates is not actively trying to damage efforts. Please stop saying that, you sound like an idiot.

You could just ask him yourself. Many of us have talked to him... some talk to him a lot...

[bluesc]

You could just ask him yourself. Many of us have talked to him... some talk to him a lot...

Surely the people here who are constantly promoting him over other liberty candidates would know his foreign policy views before throwing support behind him?

[whoisjohngalt]

Asking questions about candidates is not actively trying to damage efforts. Please stop saying that, you sound like an idiot.

You aren't asking questions with the intention of getting an answer. You are doing it for rhetorical reasons. If your intention was to get answers, you would ask Thomas yourself, but we both know that isn't your actual intent. I'm not the one who sounds like an idiot. You are going after someone who a great number of people within our movement our vouching for in a public place, that seems a lot like an attempt to damage the cause, not an attempt to get answers.

Again you value words over actions, a mark of tremendous stupidity.

[bluesc]

You aren't asking questions with the intention of getting an answer.

Nope.

[Jeremy]

Surely the people here who are constantly promoting him over other liberty candidates would know his foreign policy views before throwing support behind him?

[LibertyIn08]

Nope.